Mesh Removal Versus No Mesh Removal for Chronic Groin Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair

October 2, 2025 updated by: David Krpata

Mesh Removal Versus No Mesh Removal for Chronic Groin Pain After Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is evaluating the management of chronic post-operative inguinal hernia pain and the impact of hernia mesh removal after previous minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs.

The study aims are to evaluate the change in chronic (>6 months), nociceptive, postoperative inguinal pain after mesh removal compared to no mesh removal in patients who have previously undergone minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with pre-peritoneal mesh.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a double-blinded, parallel (1:1) group, randomized-controlled, superiority trial. Patients will be blinded to their treatment allocation and will understand that by entering the study, they may receive diagnostic laparoscopy only in which case their mesh will not be removed. However, they will be allowed to consider crossing over to the mesh removal group 6 months or later after surgery if they do not have adequate pain relief. Patients will receive written and oral descriptions of the trial and will be provided time to review written documentation in private. Written and oral consent will be obtained, and patients will understand that their participation is voluntary and refusal to participate will not affect future medical care. Patients may also withdraw from the trial at any point throughout the study period.

The Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, a center within the Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute (DDSI), at Cleveland Clinic Foundation Main Campus in Cleveland, Ohio is the hosting department for this study. Cleveland Clinic - Hillcrest Hospital in Mayfield Heights, Ohio will also be a participating center in this study. Fellowship-trained surgeons with expertise in complex abdominal wall reconstruction and mesh removal will perform the operations. If enrollment fails to meet necessary accrual size within the study timeframe, additional centers may be invited to participate.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Recruiting
        • Cleveland Clinic
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > 18 years of age
  • CPIP lasting > 6 months after laparoscopic or robotic inguinal hernia repair with pre-peritoneal mesh
  • Must exhibit 1 or more of the following characteristics of nociceptive pain:

History:

  • Pain while sitting in a chair for prolonged periods of time with relief when extending the hip or lying supine to straighten the leg
  • Severe pain when crossing the affected leg over the contralateral leg
  • "Foreign body sensation" or "tightness" in the groin

Exam:

-Diffuse tenderness with deep palpation along the inguinal ligament (over the mesh)

Somatosensory mapping:

  • Does not have a maximum trigger point for pain

  • Lacks characteristics of neuropathic pain (sharp, burning, shooting, paresthesias, allodynia, hyperalgesia, etc.)

    • Moderate to severe pain [4-10] when moving from supine to standing on NRS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No characteristics of nociceptive groin pain
  • Zero or mild pain [0-3] when moving from supine to standing on NRS
  • Recurrent inguinal hernia detected on clinical exam
  • Large, femoral, direct or indirect inguinal hernia (F2-3, M2-3, L2-3) on diagnostic laparoscopy as defined by European Hernia Society (EHS) classification
  • Prior open (anterior) approach to inguinal hernia repair (i.e. Lichtenstein)
  • Prior mesh plugs or Prolene Hernia Systems
  • History of prostatectomy or vascular procedures in the pelvis or groin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Diagnostic laparoscopy
Minimally invasive incisions will be made, and a diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed. The surgeon will evaluate the mesh configuration, ensuring proper positioning, perform adhesiolysis if indicated for bowel involvement with the mesh and assess the abdomen for alternative sources of chronic pain.
Procedure: Diagnostic laparoscopy
Surgical examination through laparoscopy without removal of mesh
Experimental: Laparoscopic mesh removal
Minimally invasive incisions will be made, and a diagnostic laparoscopy will be performed. The surgeon will evaluate the mesh configuration, ensuring proper positioning, perform adhesiolysis if indicated for bowel involvement with the mesh and assess the abdomen for alternative sources of chronic pain. If randomized to mesh removal, laparoscopic or robotic preperitoneal mesh removal.
Procedure: Diagnostic laparoscopy and inguinal mesh removal
Surgical examination and treatment of groin pain following inguinal hernia surgery by surgical exploration with a laparoscope or removal of mesh laparoscopically

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11)
Time Frame: Change in NRS-11 scores will be measured from baseline to 6 months after surgery for both groups.
NRS-11 is a validated, 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) and is commonly used to measure Chronic Post-operative Inguinal Pain (CPIP). NRS-11 categorizes pain as none [0], mild [1-3], moderate [4-6], and severe [7-10]. Patients will be asked to select the single number that best represents their groin pain intensity when moving from a supine to standing position.
Change in NRS-11 scores will be measured from baseline to 6 months after surgery for both groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months
VAS is validated and consists of a 100 mm horizontal line anchored by two descriptors indicating the extremes: 0 (no pain) and 100 (worst pain imaginable).
Baseline, 3-months and 6-months
Activities Assessment Scale (AAS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months
AAS is a 13-item, validated tool measuring physical impairment due to chronic groin pain. AAS scores are converted to a range of 0-100, with higher values indicating better functional ability.
Baseline, 3-months and 6-months
EuroQOL (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 3-months and 6-months
EQ-5D-5L is a validated tool evaluating 5 dimensions of health using 5 severity descriptors and includes a visual analog scale labeled from 0 to 100 to quantitatively measure overall health status. The larger the number the better the outcome.
Baseline, 3-months and 6-months
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11)
Time Frame: Baseline NRS-11 scores will be measured and compared to scores at 3 months after surgery for both groups.
NRS-11 is a validated, 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) and is commonly used to measure Chronic Post-operative Inguinal Pain (CPIP). NRS-11 categorizes pain as none [0], mild [1-3], moderate [4-6], and severe [7-10]. Patients will be asked to select the single number that best represents their groin pain intensity when moving from a supine to standing position.
Baseline NRS-11 scores will be measured and compared to scores at 3 months after surgery for both groups.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
David Krpata

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David Krpata, MD, The Cleveland Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 25, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 2, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 22-411

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hernia, Inguinal

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic laparoscopy and inguinal mesh removal

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings