TUbal LIgation Per Differents Endoscopic Routes and Sexuality (TULIPES) (TULIPES)

June 15, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Sexuality After Tubal Sterilization by Conventional Abdominal Laparoscopy or Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopy (vNOTES) : a Randomised Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is compare the quality of sexual life at 6 months after tubal ligation, depending on whether it was performed by abdominal laparoscopy or by vNOTES, on the basis of a non-inferiority hypothesis. Participants will answer on the FSFI-19 questionnaire and quality of sexual life will be evaluated according to the score obtained at 6 months post-operative compared to pre-operative.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sandra Curinier
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Anne-Sophie Gremeau
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sandrine Campagne Loiseau
      • Issoire, France, 63500
        • Recruiting
        • CH d'Issoire
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Clément Bruhat
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult woman, eligible for tubal ligation by total salpingectomy or tubal section coagulation, sexually active at the time of inclusion
  • Able to give informed consent to participate in research
  • Affiliated to a social security system.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Indications of another concomitant surgical procedure (other than procedure on the appendix)
  • History of upper genital infection
  • Proven or suspected rectovaginal endometriosis on clinical examination
  • History of rectal surgery
  • Virgin patient
  • Any concomitant pathology deemed incompatible with the study.
  • Uncured COVID or SARS-COv2 positivity dated less than 3 days prior to surgery.
  • Protected adult patient, under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patients not affiliated to the social security system
  • Patients who do not speak French
  • Patients under legal protection
  • Refusal to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: laparoscopic
tubal ligation by laparoscopy or vnotes technique
Experimental: vnotes
tubal ligation by laparoscopy or vnotes technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quality of sexual life
Time Frame: 6 months
To compare, on the basis of a non-inferiority hypothesis, the quality of sexual life at 6 months after tubal ligation, depending on whether it is performed by abdominal laparoscopy or by vNOTES, using the Female Sexual Function Index - 19 (FSFI-19) questionnaire (19 questions with 6 possible answers for each, with scores ranging from 0=worse outcome to 5=better outcome).
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
characteristics of the course of surgery for tubal ligation (duration of installation and intervention in minutes)
Time Frame: 6 months
- Compare the characteristics of the course of surgery for tubal ligation (duration of installation and intervention in minutes), depending on whether it is performed by abdominal laparoscopy or by vNOTES.
6 months
postoperative pain
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare the consequences of tubal ligation, depending on whether it is performed by abdominal laparoscopy or by vNOTES, in term of postoperative pain, using EVA Scale (from 0 to 10).
6 months
consumption of peroperative analgesics.
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare the consequences of tubal ligation, depending on whether it is performed by abdominal laparoscopy or by vNOTES, in term of consumption of peroperative analgesics (e.g. name of the analgesics, dose and duration of intake in days).
6 months
consumption of postoperative analgesics.
Time Frame: 6 months
Compare the consequences of tubal ligation, depending on whether it is performed by abdominal laparoscopy or by vNOTES, in term of consumption of postoperative analgesics (e.g. name of the analgesics, dose and duration of intake in days).
6 months
per and post-operative complications
Time Frame: 6 months
- Compare the consequences of tubal ligation, depending on whether it is performed by abdominal laparoscopy or by vNOTES, in terms of per and post-operative complications.
6 months
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 months
- Compare the consequences of tubal ligation, depending on whether it is performed by abdominal laparoscopy or by vNOTES, in term of patient satisfaction (Very dissatisfied, Moderately dissatisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, Moderately satisfied, Very satisfied).
6 months
quality of life after surgery
Time Frame: 6 months
- Compare the consequences of tubal ligation, depending on whether it is performed by abdominal laparoscopy or by vNOTES, in term of patient quality of life after surgery, using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (with five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems).
6 months
number of days of sick leave
Time Frame: 6 months
- Compare the number of days of sick leave, depending on whether it is performed by abdominal laparoscopy or by vNOTES.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sandra CURINIER, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 23, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

June 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RBHP 2021 CURINIER 2
  • 2021-A02263-38 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Surgery

Clinical Trials on laparoscopy

3
Subscribe