Liquid Biopsies in Esophageal Cancer

May 27, 2026 updated by: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Personalized Multimodal Treatment for Resectable Esophageal Cancer by Detecting Minimal Residual Disease Using Circulating Tumor DNA: a Multicentric Prospective Study

Purpose of this study is to determine the value of liquid biopsies, e.g. testing of minimal residual disease (MRD) by using liquid biopsies to measure circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) at diagnosis and during the multimodal and multidisciplinary curative-intent treatment of resectable esophageal cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Multicentric, retrospective and prospective components.

Retrospective collection of leftover tissue from standard of care biopsies or resection specimens and prospective collection of additional blood samples for study-specific analyses at specific timepoints, at the same time as routine labs are foreseen. No additional venipunctures are expected.

Three distinct patient groups are defined, depending on the therapeutic scenario patients undertake:

Scenario 1: primary resection then follow-up - Study-specific liquid biopsies will be collected in 98 patients, at the time of routine labs. Samples will be acquired before resection, at 6-8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after resection.

Scenario 2: chemoradiation followed by resection and follow-up - Study-specific liquid biopsies will be collected in 50 patients. Samples will be acquired before the start of chemoradiation, before surgery, 6-8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after surgery. A subgroup of patients will undertake adjuvant immunotherapy and will constitute Group 3. Timing of sampling will be adjusted accordingly as per study flowcharts.

Scenario 3: chemoradiation followed by resection followed by adjuvant immunotherapy - Study-specific liquid biopsies will be collected in 100 patients. Samples will be acquired before the start of chemoradiation, before surgery, 6-8 weeks after surgery and during adjuvant immunotherapy every 3 months including a sample at the end of treatment.

Patient management is standard of care. No investigational medicinal product (IMP) is involved.

Specific clinicopathological variables will be collected in a RedCap electronic Case Report Form and analysed as per statistical analysis plan.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
248

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Antwerp, Belgium
        • Recruiting
        • UZA
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Timon Vandamme, MD
      • Ghent, Belgium
        • Recruiting
        • UZ Gent
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Karen Geboes
      • Leuven, Belgium
        • Recruiting
        • UZLeuven
        • Contact:
          • Filip Van Herpe, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jeroen Dekervel, MD
      • Roeselare, Belgium
        • Recruiting
        • AZ Delta
        • Contact:
          • Katleen Kerstens
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jochen Decaestecker, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key inclusion criteria are:

  1. Male or female, age > 18 years
  2. New diagnosis of esophageal cancer, pathologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or adenocarcinoma (EAC)
  3. Clinically staged - cT1-4 N0-2 M0 (local or locally advanced, resectable)
  4. Eligible for multidisciplinary treatment as assessed by MDT
  5. Able to provide informed consent (ICF) according to Good Clinical Practice and national/European regulations

Key exclusion criteria are:

  1. (Oligo)metastatic disease
  2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis other than squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma (eg. neuroendocrine carcinoma, lymphoma…)
  3. Other active malignancies
  4. Previous exposure to chemoradiation (prior to MDT)
  5. Treatment plan after MDT: neoadjuvant chemotherapy with no radiation or chemoradiation with definitive intent (surgery is not planned)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: 1. primary resection then follow-up
Scenario 1: primary resection then follow-up - Study-specific liquid biopsies will be collected in 98 patients, at the time of routine labs. Samples will be acquired before resection, at 6-8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after resection.
Other: Blood sample
Retrospective collection of leftover tissue from standard of care biopsies or resection specimens and prospective collection of additional blood samples for study-specific analyses at specific timepoints, at the same time as routine labs are foreseen. No additional venipunctures are expected.
Other: 2. chemoradiation followed by resection and follow-up
Scenario 2: chemoradiation followed by resection and follow-up - Study-specific liquid biopsies will be collected in 50 patients. Samples will be acquired before the start of chemoradiation, before surgery, 6-8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after surgery. A subgroup of patients will undertake adjuvant immunotherapy and will constitute Group 3. Timing of sampling will be adjusted accordingly as per study flowcharts.
Other: Blood sample
Retrospective collection of leftover tissue from standard of care biopsies or resection specimens and prospective collection of additional blood samples for study-specific analyses at specific timepoints, at the same time as routine labs are foreseen. No additional venipunctures are expected.
Other: 3. chemoradiation followed by resection followed by adjuvant immunotherapy
chemoradiation followed by resection followed by adjuvant immunotherapy - Study-specific liquid biopsies will be collected in 100 patients. Samples will be acquired before the start of chemoradiation, before surgery, 6-8 weeks after surgery and during adjuvant immunotherapy every 3 months including a sample at the end of treatment.
Other: Blood sample
Retrospective collection of leftover tissue from standard of care biopsies or resection specimens and prospective collection of additional blood samples for study-specific analyses at specific timepoints, at the same time as routine labs are foreseen. No additional venipunctures are expected.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the potency of ctDNA MRD variant allele frequency to improve clinical staging at diagnosis of esophageal cancer.
Time Frame: 12 months
To assess whether ctDNA concentration can significantly contribute to preoperative staging in esophageal cancer, to define a significant cut-off value of ctDNA concentration with optimal sensitivity and specificity and validate the results.
12 months
To correlate the presence of minimal residual disease after resection as assessed by ctDNA with disease recurrence.
Time Frame: 12 months
To compare the two groups ctDNA positive and negative post-resection in terms of progression-free survival and overall survival (Kaplan-Meier time-to-event) and evaluate the performance of ctDNA to predict disease recurrence (Cox proportional hazards model).
12 months
To observe the ctDNA MRD dynamics during adjuvant immunotherapy .
Time Frame: 12 months
To describe the dynamics of ctDNA concentration (proportion of clearance of positive ctDNA) during standard of care adjuvant immunotherapy.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Kom Op Tegen Kanker

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jeroen Dekervel, MD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 27, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • S67328

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Blood sample

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings