The MARVIN Chatbots to Provide Information for Different Health Conditions

March 4, 2024 updated by: Dr. Bertrand Lebouche, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

A Master Research Protocol to Adapt and Evaluate an Artificial Intelligence Based Conversational Agent to Provide Information for Different Health Conditions: the MARVIN Chatbots

This research is a continuation of a usability study with the MARVIN chatbot. The investigators aim to adapt the MARVIN chatbot to open it to other health domains (e.g. breast cancer) and populations (e.g. pharmacists). Therefore, this protocol constitutes a master research protocol that will englobe different research projects with individual chatbots. The investigators adopt an adaptive platform trial design, which will allow flexibility in handling multiple interventions adapted to different populations while retaining the characteristics of a platform trial design allowing early withdrawal of ineffective trial arms based on interim data (implementation outcomes) and introduction of new trial arms.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

From 2020, the Principal Investigator's team has developed an innovative chatbot named Minimal AntiretRoViral INterference (MARVIN), for people with HIV. The primary objectives with this master protocol are to: 1) develop or adapt the MARVIN chatbots for different healthcare contexts through co-construction; 2) evaluate the global usability of individual chatbots in their respective use scenarios with a small sample of research participants; 3) evaluate the implementation and user outcomes (e.g., fidelity, appropriateness) of individual chatbots in their respective use scenarios with a larger sample of research participants. This includes also documentation of factors that inhibit or enhance the utilization of the chatbots and outcomes; and 4) establish and evaluate, through the previous objectives, different partnerships with research participants and research team members to co-construct chatbots that will respond to their needs and encourage continued use of the tool.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 3E4
        • Recruiting
        • Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
        • Contact:
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1
        • Recruiting
        • McGill University Health Centre (MUHC)
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Esli Osmanlliu, MDCM, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria for all objectives:

  • being 14 years or older;
  • being fluent in English and/or French;
  • being able to understand the requirements of study participation and provide informed consent during the duration of the study;
  • having access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer at home/at workplace;
  • having access to an internet connection at home or data plan on their device.

Inclusion Criteria Specific to objectives 2 and 3:

  • accept to use a Facebook Messenger-based Chatbot;
  • accept to use or create a personal Facebook account;
  • accept Facebook's privacy and data security policies.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not meeting the inclusion criteria
  • any reason, in the opinion of the investigator, which would make the candidate inappropriate for participation in an investigative study involving a chatbot (e.g., cognitive deficit)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: MARVIN: a Chatbot for HIV patients
Co-construction of the chatbot, Usability study, Implementation, Evaluation of outcomes and Continuous improvements
Other: MARVIN
Chatbot on Meta (Facebook) Messenger for HIV Patients
Other: MARVIN: a Chatbot for Community Pharmacists
Co-construction of the chatbots, Usability study, Implementation, Evaluation of outcomes and Continuous improvements
Other: MARVIN-Pharma
Chatbot on Meta (Facebook) Messenger for community pharmacists
Other: MARVINA: a Chatbot for Breast Cancer Patients
Co-construction of the chatbots, Usability study, Implementation, Evaluation of outcomes and Continuous improvements
Other: MARVINA
Chatbot on Meta (Facebook) Messenger for breast cancer patients
Other: MARVIN CHAMP: a Chatbot for Pediatric Infectious Conditions
Co-construction of the chatbots, Usability study, Implementation, Evaluation of outcomes and Continuous improvements
Other: MARVIN-CHAMP
CHatbot to Assist the Management of Pediatric patients with infectious conditions (CHAMP)
Other Names:
  • CHAMP
  • CHAMPIONS
  • CHatbot to Assist the Management of Pediatric patients with infectious conditions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability Metric for User eXperience (UMUX-Lite)
Time Frame: Immediately, after 1-month of testing - objective 2
The UMUX-Lite is a 2-item questionnaire, answered on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree), that was deemed appropriate for evaluating medical technology. The items ask whether the chatbot meets the user's needs and the user's perceived ease of use. Scores range from 0 to 100, with more than 68 being considered high usability according to the literature.
Immediately, after 1-month of testing - objective 2
Acceptability E-Scale (AES)
Time Frame: Immediately after 1-month of testing - objective 2
The AES contains 6 items rated with different 5-point Likert scales (e.g., 1=very difficult to 5=very easy). It is a validated measure of acceptability and usability of computer-based interventions for health populations. Scores range from 0 to 30, and according to the literature, scores above 24 are considered high acceptability.
Immediately after 1-month of testing - objective 2
Change in Acceptability E-Scale (AES) over 12 months
Time Frame: Once every 3 months within 12 months
The AES contains 6 items rated with different 5-point Likert scales (e.g., 1=very difficult to 5=very easy). It is a validated measure of acceptability and usability of computer-based interventions for health populations. Scores range from 0 to 30, and according to the literature, scores above 24 are considered high acceptability.
Once every 3 months within 12 months
Change in Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) over 12 months
Time Frame: Once every 3 months within 12 months
Appropriateness relates to the relevance or compatibility of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem. The compatibility of an information technology innovation is the extent of which it is considered consistent with users' values, needs, and past experiences. The Compatibility Subscale is a validated tool that contains three items and evaluates on 7-points Likert scales (1 = extremely disagree to 7 = extremely agree) how an IT innovation "fits" with the user's work style. A modified version could be used by healthcare professionals, such as pharmacists.
Once every 3 months within 12 months
Change in Compatibility Subscale over 12 months
Time Frame: Once every 3 months within 12 months
Appropriateness relates to the relevance or compatibility of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem. The compatibility of an information technology innovation is the extent of which it is considered consistent with users' values, needs, and past experiences. A validated tool that could be used by patients is the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). It also contains 4 items scored on a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree) of agreement evaluating how the innovation is suitable for users.
Once every 3 months within 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bertrand Lebouché, MD, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2033

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 4, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MP-37-2023-9333

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings