- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05789901
The MARVIN Chatbots to Provide Information for Different Health Conditions
March 4, 2024 updated by: Dr. Bertrand Lebouche, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
A Master Research Protocol to Adapt and Evaluate an Artificial Intelligence Based Conversational Agent to Provide Information for Different Health Conditions: the MARVIN Chatbots
This research is a continuation of a usability study with the MARVIN chatbot.
The investigators aim to adapt the MARVIN chatbot to open it to other health domains (e.g.
breast cancer) and populations (e.g.
pharmacists).
Therefore, this protocol constitutes a master research protocol that will englobe different research projects with individual chatbots.
The investigators adopt an adaptive platform trial design, which will allow flexibility in handling multiple interventions adapted to different populations while retaining the characteristics of a platform trial design allowing early withdrawal of ineffective trial arms based on interim data (implementation outcomes) and introduction of new trial arms.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
From 2020, the Principal Investigator's team has developed an innovative chatbot named Minimal AntiretRoViral INterference (MARVIN), for people with HIV.
The primary objectives with this master protocol are to: 1) develop or adapt the MARVIN chatbots for different healthcare contexts through co-construction; 2) evaluate the global usability of individual chatbots in their respective use scenarios with a small sample of research participants; 3) evaluate the implementation and user outcomes (e.g., fidelity, appropriateness) of individual chatbots in their respective use scenarios with a larger sample of research participants.
This includes also documentation of factors that inhibit or enhance the utilization of the chatbots and outcomes; and 4) establish and evaluate, through the previous objectives, different partnerships with research participants and research team members to co-construct chatbots that will respond to their needs and encourage continued use of the tool.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
400
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Bertrand Lebouché, MD
- Phone Number: 514-843-2090
- Email: bertrand.lebouche@mcgill.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 3E4
- Recruiting
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM)
-
Contact:
- Marie-Pacale Pomey, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 14302 514 890 8000
- Email: marie-pascale.pomey@umontreal.ca
-
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1
- Recruiting
- McGill University Health Centre (MUHC)
-
Contact:
- Bertrand Lebouché, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 5148432090
- Email: bertrand.lecbouche@mcgill.ca
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Esli Osmanlliu, MDCM, MSc
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria for all objectives:
- being 14 years or older;
- being fluent in English and/or French;
- being able to understand the requirements of study participation and provide informed consent during the duration of the study;
- having access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer at home/at workplace;
- having access to an internet connection at home or data plan on their device.
Inclusion Criteria Specific to objectives 2 and 3:
- accept to use a Facebook Messenger-based Chatbot;
- accept to use or create a personal Facebook account;
- accept Facebook's privacy and data security policies.
Exclusion Criteria:
- not meeting the inclusion criteria
- any reason, in the opinion of the investigator, which would make the candidate inappropriate for participation in an investigative study involving a chatbot (e.g., cognitive deficit)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: MARVIN: a Chatbot for HIV patients
Co-construction of the chatbot, Usability study, Implementation, Evaluation of outcomes and Continuous improvements
|
Chatbot on Meta (Facebook) Messenger for HIV Patients
|
|
Other: MARVIN: a Chatbot for Community Pharmacists
Co-construction of the chatbots, Usability study, Implementation, Evaluation of outcomes and Continuous improvements
|
Chatbot on Meta (Facebook) Messenger for community pharmacists
|
|
Other: MARVINA: a Chatbot for Breast Cancer Patients
Co-construction of the chatbots, Usability study, Implementation, Evaluation of outcomes and Continuous improvements
|
Chatbot on Meta (Facebook) Messenger for breast cancer patients
|
|
Other: MARVIN CHAMP: a Chatbot for Pediatric Infectious Conditions
Co-construction of the chatbots, Usability study, Implementation, Evaluation of outcomes and Continuous improvements
|
CHatbot to Assist the Management of Pediatric patients with infectious conditions (CHAMP)
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Usability Metric for User eXperience (UMUX-Lite)
Time Frame: Immediately, after 1-month of testing - objective 2
|
The UMUX-Lite is a 2-item questionnaire, answered on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree), that was deemed appropriate for evaluating medical technology.
The items ask whether the chatbot meets the user's needs and the user's perceived ease of use.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with more than 68 being considered high usability according to the literature.
|
Immediately, after 1-month of testing - objective 2
|
|
Acceptability E-Scale (AES)
Time Frame: Immediately after 1-month of testing - objective 2
|
The AES contains 6 items rated with different 5-point Likert scales (e.g., 1=very difficult to 5=very easy).
It is a validated measure of acceptability and usability of computer-based interventions for health populations.
Scores range from 0 to 30, and according to the literature, scores above 24 are considered high acceptability.
|
Immediately after 1-month of testing - objective 2
|
|
Change in Acceptability E-Scale (AES) over 12 months
Time Frame: Once every 3 months within 12 months
|
The AES contains 6 items rated with different 5-point Likert scales (e.g., 1=very difficult to 5=very easy).
It is a validated measure of acceptability and usability of computer-based interventions for health populations.
Scores range from 0 to 30, and according to the literature, scores above 24 are considered high acceptability.
|
Once every 3 months within 12 months
|
|
Change in Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) over 12 months
Time Frame: Once every 3 months within 12 months
|
Appropriateness relates to the relevance or compatibility of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem.
The compatibility of an information technology innovation is the extent of which it is considered consistent with users' values, needs, and past experiences.
The Compatibility Subscale is a validated tool that contains three items and evaluates on 7-points Likert scales (1 = extremely disagree to 7 = extremely agree) how an IT innovation "fits" with the user's work style.
A modified version could be used by healthcare professionals, such as pharmacists.
|
Once every 3 months within 12 months
|
|
Change in Compatibility Subscale over 12 months
Time Frame: Once every 3 months within 12 months
|
Appropriateness relates to the relevance or compatibility of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem.
The compatibility of an information technology innovation is the extent of which it is considered consistent with users' values, needs, and past experiences.
A validated tool that could be used by patients is the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM).
It also contains 4 items scored on a five-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree) of agreement evaluating how the innovation is suitable for users.
|
Once every 3 months within 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bertrand Lebouché, MD, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2033
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2034
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 27, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
March 29, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
March 6, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 4, 2024
Last Verified
March 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
- Adherence
- Breast Cancer
- HIV
- Telehealth
- mHealth
- Self-Management
- Artificial Intelligence
- Care
- Digital Health
- Antiretroviral Therapy
- Implementation Science
- Chatbot
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Intelligent Conversational Agent
- Co-Construction
- Adaptive Platform Trial Design
- Patient and Stakeholder Engagement
- Pediatric Infection
- Large Language Models
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MP-37-2023-9333
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV Infections
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnHIV Infections | HIV/AIDS | Hiv | AIDS | Aids/Hiv Problem | AIDS and InfectionsUnited States
-
CAN Community HealthGilead Sciences; Midway Specialty Care Center; Costello Medical Inc.Not yet recruitingHIV | HIV 1 Infection | HIV -1 Infection | HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)United States
-
University of California, San DiegoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; University of Southern California; California... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Gérond'ifRecruiting
-
University of California, DavisCompleted
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)CompletedHIV PositiveUnited States
-
University of ChicagoUniversity of Athens; National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.Completed
-
University of ZimbabweCompleted
-
Florida International UniversityCompleted
-
Boston Children's HospitalNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)Completed