A Feasibility Pilot Study on Lee Silverman Voice Treatment-Loud: a Telerehabilitation Approach

August 27, 2025 updated by: Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

A Feasibility Pilot Study on Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT)-Loud on Voice Intensity and Voice Use in Daily Living in People With Multiple Sclerosis: a Telerehabilitation Approach

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common causes of neurological disability in young adults. At least 62% of people with MS have speech, vocal, or communication disorders. Among these, alterations in voice intensity and quality constitute a limitation in MS people's social life leading to experience difficulties in work, conversations, and communication especially in noisy environments or through the telephone. Though voice and speech impairments and speech impairments are widely prevalent in this population, only 2% of the people receive speech therapy. The Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT)-Loud is a well-documented, efficacious intensive speech intervention, for treating hypophonia in subjects with neurological conditions. Despite the effectiveness of LSVT-Loud treatment on the voice has been reported in MS, several factors prevent the agile use of this method in rehabilitation centers: motor disability, work commitments, and distance barriers may preclude repeated attendance of this intervention at a healthcare facility. Telerehabilitation represents a feasible solution to bypass these potential barriers related to attendance at the rehabilitation programs in the clinic. The increasing evidence sustains the role of telerehabilitation for the migration of care from the clinic to the patient's homes, overcoming several obstacles affecting service accessibility. Previous studies showed the validity and the non-inferiority of LSVT-Loud delivered via telerehabilitation in subjects with Parkinson's Disease, while no pieces of evidence are still available on the efficacy of voice treatment delivered by telerehabilitation in MS. It is plausible to assume that LSVT-Loud delivered by telerehabilitation would be feasible and provide a beneficial effect also for MS non-inferior compared to the same treatment delivered in the clinic.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

20 patients with MS will be recruited from IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, according to inclusion/exclusion criteria detailed in the "Eligibility Criteria" section.

Participants will be randomized into 2 different groups:

Group 1: Lee Silverman Voice Treatment - Loud delivered by telerehabilitation at home (Experimental group); Group 2: Lee Silverman Voice Treatment - Loud delivered in the clinic (Control group).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Italy/Milan
      • Milan, Italy/Milan, Italy, 20148
        • Fondazione Don Gnocchi ONLUS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of MS according to the criteria of MC Donald 2010 (Polman et al., 2011; Thompson et al., 2018)
  • perceived voice intensity disability and severity of speech and voice disorder prior to treatment (as judged independently by two speech-language pathologists highly experienced with voice and motor speech disorders)
  • age ≥ 18;
  • not treated for hypophonia in the six months before enrollment in the study
  • with a preserved cognitive level at the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE test >24) (Folstein et al., 1975);
  • available and able to use a PC with an internet connection at home to access the telerehabilitation sessions;
  • agreeing to participate with the signature of the informed consent form;
  • stable drug treatment (last 3 months), if any;
  • absence of relapses (last month) before taking part in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of dysphonia related to other diseases;
  • presence of other neurological disorders different from MS;
  • presence of major psychiatric conditions;
  • presence of severe impairment of visual and/or acoustic perception;
  • history of laryngeal cancer, radiotherapy, or head-neck trauma, or intubation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LSVT-Loud delivered by telerehabilitation
F - Frequency: 7 times/week for 4 weeks according to a mixed model (4 days of synchronous sessions followed by independent practice + 3 asynchronous sessions); I - Intensity: sessions customized according to the patient's functional abilities to ensure the progression of difficulty in rehabilitation sessions; T- Time: each synchronous session will last about 60 minutes, each independent practice will last about 5-10 minutes, and each asynchronous session will last about 30 minutes; T- Type: Individual speech therapy sessions with the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment-Loud method delivered by telerehabilitation.
LSVT-Loud treatment delivered by telerehabilitation
Active Comparator: LSVT-Loud in the clinic

The frequency, intensity, time of the rehabilitation sessions will be the same as the experimental group.

T- Type: Individual speech therapy sessions with the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment-Loud method delivered in the clinic.

LSVT-Loud delivered face-to-face in the clinic

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the vocal Intensity during 1-minute monologue dB SPL
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)
Participants will be requested to speak about daily activities at a comfortable frequency and intensity level. A specific task identical for each participant will be given: "Please speak for at least a minute." For monologue (and other acoustic variables described below) recording setup follows published recommendations, mouth-to-microphone distance is kept at 30 cm and we will calculate the mean of the first three recordings and PRAAT software (www.praat.org) will be used to record and analyze voice parameters.
Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the vocal Intensity during 1-minute monologue dB SPL
Time Frame: follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of the treatment)
Participants will be requested to speak about daily activities at a comfortable frequency and intensity level. A specific task identical for each participant will be given: "Please speak for at least a minute." For monologue (and other acoustic variables described below) recording setup follows published recommendations, mouth-to-microphone distance is kept at 30 cm and we will calculate the mean of the first three recordings and PRAAT software (www.praat.org) will be used to record and analyze voice parameters.
follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of the treatment)
Change in sustained /a/ voice intensity (dB SPL/a/)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment)
Participants' voices will be monitored for a total of 4 hours of consecutive speech. Voice data from daily life will be registered using the Vocal Holter Med (VHM) before and after the interventions. VHM consists of a contact microphone placed in a collar worn around the neck as well as a device for data storage that can be worn in a pocket during the day. The contact microphone measures the skin vibrations caused by the activity of the vocal cords. Besides the voice indicators, also local temperature and relative humidity are measured during monitoring.
Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment)
Change in the perception of voice as measured by the Voice Handicap Index (VHI, Jacobson et al., 1997)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment
VHI is a standardized 30-point questionnaire, divided into three subscales covering functional, emotional, and physical aspects of voice disorders. Participants have to rate each statement using a 5-point scale scored from 0 (never) to 4 (always); the maximum score is 120 (worst score). The value of 12 points on the VHI test should be considered as a threshold for rating the handicap caused by voice disorders.
Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment
hange in perceived quality of life (especially in cognition, life activities, and participation domain) as measured by the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0; Federici et al., 2017)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment
WHODAS 2.0 covers six domains of functioning including Cognition, Mobility, Self-care, Getting along, Life activities, Participation. Scores assigned to each item are on a 5-point scale ranging from (0) "none" to (4) "extreme" with higher scores indicating a higher disability. The 36-item version will be administered and both summary scores (score range 0-144 with higher numbers indicating higher disability) and domain-specific scores for the six different functioning domains (especially in cognition, life activities, and participation domain; score range 0-24 for each domain with higher numbers indicating higher disability) will be considered.
Baseline, post-treatment (up to 4 weeks) and follow-up (up to 6 months from the end of treatment
Protocol adherence
Time Frame: post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)
Synchronous sessions' adherence to the treatment will be registered by the telerehabilitation platform (experimental group) or by the therapist (control group). Asynchronous sessions' attendance will be registered by the completion of the patient's diary.
post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technological Systems interaction perceived experience as measured by the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ; Schrepp et al., 2017)
Time Frame: post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)
The UEQ is a 26-item scale (semantic differential scale: each item consists of two opposite adjectives, e.g., boring vs. exciting) that allows calculating six different domains: (1) attractiveness (overall impression of the system), (2) perspicuity: easily to learn how to use the system; (3) efficiency (user's effort to solve tasks); (4) dependability (feeling of control of the interaction); (5) stimulation (motivation to use the system); and (6) novelty (innovation and creation of system). The mean of the item score of each domain will be standardized based on a data benchmark (Schrepp et al., 2017).
post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)
Intrinsic Motivation in the rehabilitation program as measured by the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory - Interest/Enjoyment subscale (IMI-IE; McAuley et al., 1989)
Time Frame: post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)
IMI-IE consisted of a pool of 7 items with a 7 points Likert scale ranging from (1) "Absolutely Not" to (7) "Absolutely Yes". A total score (average of the item scores) will be considered.
post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)
Number of adverse events
Time Frame: post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)
Adverse events will be listed in the patient's diary considering both events occurring during the therapy and those occurring outside of the sessions but within the rehabilitation protocol period
post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)
4. Perceived rehabilitation engagement, acceptability, feasibility, frequency, and dose adequacy
Time Frame: post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)
Individual and group ad-hoc interviews will be performed during and after the rehabilitation protocol period.
post-treatment (up to 4 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ON-LOUD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on LSVT-Loud delivered by telerehabilitation

Search Similar Trials