In Situ Comparison of the Remineralization Potential of Optimized Fluoride Dentifrice With Control Fluoride Dentifrice
Comparison of the Remineralization Potential of an Optimized Fluoride Dentifrice With a Control Fluoride Dentifrice Using an in Situ Caries Model
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Lorena Galvez
- Phone Number: 317-274-8838
- Email: logalvez@iu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
- Indiana University School of dentistry, Oral Health Research institute 415 Lansing Street
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- provide voluntary, written informed consent;
- be between 18 and 85 years old;
- understand and be willing, able and likely to comply with all study procedures and restrictions;
- be wearing a removable mandibular partial denture with sufficient room to accommodate two 4 mm round specimens in the buccal surface of two posterior denture teeth on the same side;
- be willing and capable of wearing their removable partial denture 24 hours a day for three (3), two-week treatment periods;
- be willing to allow study personnel to drill specimen sites in two denture teeth in the posterior section of one side of their lower partial denture, which may extend into the buccal flange area below the teeth;
- be in good medical and dental health with no active caries or periodontal disease; NOTE: subjects presenting at screening with caries may continue in the study if their carious lesions are restored prior to beginning treatment 1; and
- have a salivary flow rate in the range of normal values (unstimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.2 mL/min; gum base stimulated whole saliva flow rate ≥ 0.8 mL/min).
Exclusion Criteria:
- currently be pregnant, intending to become pregnant during the study period or breast feeding;
- currently have any medical condition that could be expected to interfere with the subject's safety during the study period;
- currently be taking antibiotics or have taken antibiotics in the two weeks prior to the beginning treatment 1;
- known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to the study materials (or closely related compounds) or any of their stated ingredients;
- have participated in another clinical study or receipt of an investigational drug within 30 days of beginning treatment 1; or
- be taking fluoride supplements, required to use a fluoride mouthrinse or have received a professional fluoride treatment in the two weeks preceding specimen placement.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Test-Positive-Placebo
Crossover design - Cleaning, 2-3 day non-Fluoride (F) dentifrice, Period 1 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 2 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 3 product for 2 weeks.
Product sequence: 1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride Test Product,1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride (positive control) , 0 ppm F (placebo, negative control)
|
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Test-Placebo-Positive
Crossover design - Cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 1 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 2 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 3 product for 2 weeks.
Product sequence: 1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride Test Product, 0 ppm F (placebo, negative control),1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride (positive control)
|
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Positive-Test-Placebo
Crossover design - Cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 1 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 2 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 3 product for 2 weeks.
Product sequence: 1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride (positive control), 1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride Test Product, 0 ppm F (placebo, negative control)
|
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Positive-Placebo-Test
Crossover design - Cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 1 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 2 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 3 product for 2 weeks.
Product sequence: 1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride (positive control), 0 ppm F (placebo, negative control), 1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride Test Product
|
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Placebo-Test-Positive
Crossover design - Cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 1 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 2 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 3 product for 2 weeks.
Product sequence: 0 ppm F (placebo, negative control), 1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride Test Product,1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride (positive control)
|
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Placebo-Positive-Test
Crossover design - Cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 1 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 2 product for 2 weeks, 4-5 day washout, cleaning, 2-3 day non-F dentifrice, Period 3 product for 2 weeks.
Product sequence: 0 ppm F (placebo, negative control),1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride (positive control), 1100 ppm F as sodium fluoride Test Product
|
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
• Each subject will use this product during one of the three treatment periods in the crossover study design.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Surface Microhardness Recovery (%SMH Recovery)
Time Frame: at the end of each two-week treatment per
|
The SMH test was used to assess changes in the mineral status of partially demineralized enamel specimens. %SMH Recovery = (D1-R)/(D1-B) ×100 B = indentation length (µm) of sound enamel specimen at baseline D1 = indentation length (µm) after in vitro demineralization R = indentation length (µm) after intra-oral exposure. |
at the end of each two-week treatment per
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Enamel Fluoride Uptake (µg F/cm2)
Time Frame: at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
The microdrill enamel biopsy technique will be used to analyze the fluoride content of the partially demineralized enamel specimens.
Each enamel specimen will be mounted perpendicular to the long axis of a drill bit attached to a specially designed microdrill and drilled to a depth of ~100 µm through the entire lesion (four cores per specimen).
The diameter of the drill hole will be determined using a calibrated microscope interfaced with an image analysis system.
The amount of fluoride-uptake by enamel will be calculated based on the amount of fluoride divided by the area of the enamel cores and expressed as µg F/cm2
|
at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
|
Percent Net Acid Resistance
Time Frame: at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
% Net Acid Resistance = [(D1-D2) / (D1-B)] * 100 B= Indentation length (µm) of sound enamel at baseline D1= Indentation length (µm) after first in vitro demineralization D2= Indentation length (µm) after second in vitro demineralization
|
at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
|
Percentage Comparative Acid Resistance
Time Frame: at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
% Comparative Acid Resistance = [(D2-R) / (D1-B)] * 100 B= Indentation length (µm) of sound enamel at baseline R= Indentation length (µm) of enamel after in situ remineralization D1= Indentation length (µm) after first in vitro demineralization D2= Indentation length (µm) after second in vitro demineralization
|
at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
|
Integrated Mineral Loss (∆Z)
Time Frame: at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
∆Z= [(lesion depth x 87) - area under the curve*] calculated using Transverse Microradiography software program
|
at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
|
Lesion Depth (µm)
Time Frame: at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
Lesion Depth - L (83% mineral i.e. 95% of the mineral content of sound enamel) determined using Transverse Microradiography software program
|
at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
|
Maximum Mineral Density at the Surface-zone (SZmax)
Time Frame: at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
SZmax was determined using Transverse Microradiography software program
|
at the end of each two-week treatment period
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anderson Hara, DDS, PhD, Indiana University
- Principal Investigator: Domenick Zero, DDS, MS, Indiana University
- Principal Investigator: Frank Lippert, PhD, Indiana University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Zero DT. In situ caries models. Adv Dent Res. 1995 Nov;9(3):214-30; discussion 231-4. doi: 10.1177/08959374950090030501.
- Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Appelbe P, Marinho VC, Shi X. Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD007868. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007868.pub2.
- Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Sheiham A, Logan S. Fluoride toothpastes for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD002278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002278.
- Clinical Aspects of De/Remineralization of Teeth. Proceedings of Models Conference 1994. Rochester, New York, June 11-14, 1994. Adv Dent Res. 1995 Nov;9(3):169-340. No abstract available.
- Corpron RE, Clark JW, Tsai A, More FG, Merrill DF, Kowalski CJ, Tice TR, Rowe CE. Intraoral effects of a fluoride-releasing device on acid-softened enamel. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986 Sep;113(3):383-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0202.
- Featherstone JD, Mellberg JR. Relative rates of progress of artificial carious lesions in bovine, ovine and human enamel. Caries Res. 1981;15(1):109-14. doi: 10.1159/000260508. No abstract available.
- Cate JM, Arends J. Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions in vitro. Caries Res. 1977;11(5):277-86. doi: 10.1159/000260279. No abstract available.
- Koulourides T, Phantumvanit P, Munksgaard EC, Housch T. An intraoral model used for studies of fluoride incorporation in enamel. J Oral Pathol. 1974;3(4):185-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1974.tb01710.x. No abstract available.
- Lippert F, Butler A, Lynch RJ. Characteristics of methylcellulose acid gel lesions created in human and bovine enamel. Caries Res. 2013;47(1):50-5. doi: 10.1159/000343164. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
- Lippert F, Hara AT. Fluoride dose-response of human and bovine enamel caries lesions under remineralizing conditions. Am J Dent. 2012 Aug;25(4):205-9.
- Lippert F, Lynch RJ. Comparison of Knoop and Vickers surface microhardness and transverse microradiography for the study of early caries lesion formation in human and bovine enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2014 Jul;59(7):704-10. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
- Mellberg JR. Hard-tissue substrates for evaluation of cariogenic and anti-cariogenic activity in situ. J Dent Res. 1992 Apr;71 Spec No:913-9. doi: 10.1177/002203459207100S25.
- Proskin HM, Chilton NW, Kingman A. Interim report of the ad hoc committee for the consideration of statistical concerns related to the use of intra-oral models in submissions for product claims approval to the American Dental Association. J Dent Res. 1992 Apr;71 Spec No:949-52. doi: 10.1177/002203459207100S31.
- Sakkab NY, Cilley WA, Haberman JP. Fluoride in deciduous teeth from an anti-caries clinical study. J Dent Res. 1984 Oct;63(10):1201-5. doi: 10.1177/00220345840630100601.
- Twetman S, Axelsson S, Dahlgren H, Holm AK, Kallestal C, Lagerlof F, Lingstrom P, Mejare I, Nordenram G, Norlund A, Petersson LG, Soder B. Caries-preventive effect of fluoride toothpaste: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003 Dec;61(6):347-55. doi: 10.1080/00016350310007590.
- White DJ. Use of synthetic polymer gels for artificial carious lesion preparation. Caries Res. 1987;21(3):228-42. doi: 10.1159/000261026. No abstract available.
- Zero DT, Rahbek I, Fu J, Proskin HM, Featherstone JD. Comparison of the iodide permeability test, the surface microhardness test, and mineral dissolution of bovine enamel following acid challenge. Caries Res. 1990;24(3):181-8. doi: 10.1159/000261263.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23-I-121
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Caries
-
NCT07048444Not yet recruitingCaries,Dental | Caries; Initial | Caries Assessment | Caries Active | Caries Root
-
NCT07342595Not yet recruitingCaries; Initial | Caries Assessment | Caries; Dentin
-
NCT04365270CompletedPulpitis | Caries | Caries,Dental | Reversible Pulpitis | Caries Class I | Caries; Dentin
-
NCT04929327Not yet recruitingPit and Fissure Caries | Caries; Initial
-
NCT06256601RecruitingDeep Caries | Dentin Caries
-
NCT06803537Active, not recruitingOcclusal Caries | Proximal Caries
-
NCT06724939Active, not recruitingProximal Caries | Occlual Caries
-
NCT07575646Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07320885CompletedCaries Class II | Caries; Dentin
-
NCT04286256Completed
Clinical Trials on 0 ppm F (placebo, negative control)
-
NCT03383783Completed
-
NCT02637830Completed
-
NCT01709019CompletedRespiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
-
NCT03301870CompletedIrritation Potential of Topic Agent
-
NCT06980090RecruitingPlacebo Effect | Expectations | Negative Affectivity | Non-invasive Brain Stimulation
-
NCT01039389Completed
-
NCT04179994Unknown