Fruquintinib With PD-1 Inhibitors Versus TAS-102 With Bevacizumab in Late-Line mCRC

September 2, 2023 updated by: Hunan Cancer Hospital

Fruquintinib With PD-1 Inhibitors Versus TAS-102 With Bevacizumab in Late-Line mCRC: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on Propensity Score Matching

Fruquintinib with PD-1 inhibitors (FP) and TAS-102 with bevacizumab (TB) are two common therapies for patients with previous-treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it's still not clear that which therapy can bring better prognosis. Our study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib with PD-1 Inhibitors versus TAS-102 with bevacizumab in Late-Line mCRC between July 2019 to October 2022July 2019 and June 2021 at the Hunan Cancer Hospital.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in Hunan Cancer Hospital. Patients (pts) with mCRC who had received at least the 2nd line treatment were eligible. Propensity score (PS) would be calculated to balance the baseline characteristics of two arms. Overall survival (OS) was set as the primary endpoint. From July 2019 to October 2022, 106 eligible pts in total were enrolled. According to the treatment received, 72 and 34 pts were respectively allocated into FP cohort and TB cohort.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
106

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China
        • Hunan Cancer Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study population were the patients treated with at least 2 cycle of fruquintinib plus PD-1 Inhibitors or TAS-102 plus BEV in patients suffering refractory mCRC from July 2019 to October 2022 at the Hunan Cancer Hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Has histologically confirmed unresectable adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (all other histological types are excluded).
  2. Have progressed from at least 2 lines of standard treatment,including fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, with or without targeted drugs, like bevacizumab and cetuximab (only for RAS wild-type). Regorafenib was permitted but not required for inclusion.
  3. Has measurable or non-measurable disease as defined by RECIST version 1.1
  4. Is able to swallow oral tablets.
  5. Estimated life expectancy ≥12 weeks.
  6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) less than 2
  7. Has adequate organ function.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy, lactating female or possibility of becoming pregnant during the study.
  2. Has not recovered from clinically relevant non-hematologic CTCAE grade ≥ 3 toxicity of previous anticancer therapy (excluding alopecia, and skin pigmentation).
  3. Has symptomatic central nervous system metastases that are neurologically unstable or requiring increasing doses of steroids to control CNS disease.
  4. Has severe or uncontrolled active acute or chronic infection.
  5. Known carriers of HIV antibodies.
  6. Confirmed uncontrolled arterial hypertension or uncontrolled or symptomatic arrhythmia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Fruquintinib plus PD-1 inhibitors
In fruquintinib plus PD-1 inhibitors group,The patients were treated orally with Fruquintinib (5mg once daily for 14 days on/7 days off, over a 21-day cycle), combined with 1 of the 5 anti-PD-1 antibodies (i.e., nivolumab, pembrolizumab, camrelizumab, sintilimab, or toripalimab). The anti-PD-1 antibody was administered intravenously on day 1, and its recommended dosage was as follows: nivolumab: 240 mg, every 2 weeks; pembrolizumab, camrelizumab, and sintilimab: 200 mg every 3 weeks; and toripalimab: 240 mg every 3 weeks.
Drug: Fruquintinib
5mg once daily for 14 days on/7 days off, over a 21-day cycle
Drug: PD-1 inhibitors
The anti-PD-1 antibody was administered intravenously on day 1, and its recommended dosage was as follows: nivolumab: 240 mg, every 2 weeks; pembrolizumab, camrelizumab, and sintilimab: 200 mg every 3 weeks; and toripalimab: 240 mg every 3 weeks.
Other Names:
  • anti-PD-1 antibodies
TAS-102 plus bevacizumab
In TAS-102 plus BEV group, Patients received TAS-102 (35 mg/m²orally twice a day on days 1-5 and 8-12, every 28 days) and bevacizumab (5 mg /kg, intravenously, on days 1 and 15, every 28 days). Bevacizumab was approved to be a 30-minute intravenous infusion before TAS-102.
Drug: Trifluridine/Tipiracil
TAS-102 35 mg/m²orally twice a day on days 1-5 and 8-12, every 28 days
Other Names:
  • Lonsurf
  • TAS-102
  • S 95005
Drug: Bevacizumab
Bevacizumab 5 mg /kg, intravenously on days 1,15,every 28 days
Other Names:
  • Avastin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Approximately 12 months
Overall survival defined as the observed time elapsed between the date of commencement of treatment and the date of death due to any cause
Approximately 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Approximately 12 months
Progression-free survival defined as the time elapsed between the date of commencement of treatment and the date of radiologic tumour progression according to RECIST version 1.1 by investigator's judgement or death from any cause, whichever comes first.
Approximately 12 months
Overall response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Approximately 12 months
Overall response rate (ORR) was regarded as the proportion of complete responses (CRs) and partial responses (PRs) according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria and using investigator's tumor assessment
Approximately 12 months
Disease control rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Approximately 12 months
Disease control rate has been defined as the addition of (CR + PR) rate and also stable disease (SD) rate
Approximately 12 months
Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAE)
Time Frame: Approximately 12 months
Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAE) as assessed by CTCAE v5.0, including serious adverse events (SAEs)
Approximately 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hunan Cancer Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rongrong li, professor, Hunan Cancer Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • FPTB-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for principal investigator or correspondence author]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

please contact the principal investigator of this study or correspondence author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings