TrEatment Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis: TETRA-study (TETRA)

September 4, 2025 updated by: Sint Maartenskliniek

TrEatment Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Randomized Multi-centre, Treat to Target Strategy Trial: TETRA Study

There is currently no cure for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but many treatment options are available. The central aim of RA treatment is lowering disease activity. The proactive treatment strategy called treat to target (T2T) includes measuring disease activity, setting a target and adjusting treatment accordingly until the goal is reached. T2T has proven to be superior to usual care, but there is much debate regarding the most optimal treatment measure and target. The Disease Activity Score with 28-joint counts and c-reactive protein (DAS28CRP) low-disease activity (LDA) target and the more stringent Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission target are the best validated targets. Especially the DAS28CRP is the most commonly used in research and practice, whereas the SDAI remission target is most recommended. The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommends to strive for remission, whereas the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommends to strive for LDA. In patients with new and established RA, the (cost)effectiveness of aiming for remission compared to LDA when starting and tapering antirheumatic drugs has not been directly compared. This study therefore aims to directly compare two T2T strategies, aiming at DAS28CRP-LDA and SDAI remission, in patients with established RA.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
340

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
      • Ubbergen, Netherlands, 6574 NA
        • Sint Maartenskliniek

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of RA (according to the 2010 or 1987 ACR/ EULAR classification criteria and/or clinical diagnosis)
  • (Starting) use of a DMARD
  • Aged 16 years or older
  • At most low disease activity, operationalised as DAS28-CRP <3.5 (DAS28 CRP 2.9 cut off for low disease activity with measurement error 0.6) or SDAI <19 (SDAI 11 cut off for low disease activity with measurement error of 8). A state of low disease activity is required at inclusion, as for RA patients in moderate or high disease activity there is no equipoise on the best course of action (treatment needs to be escalated).
  • Fluency of Dutch or English, both written and verbally; able to fill in questionnaires
  • Provided informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical deep remission, operationalised as SDAI <3.3 or DAS28-CRP <2.4, and an taper attempt in the past 2 years that was discontinued due to occurrence of flare.
  • Fewer than 3 DMARD treatment options left for this patient (severe difficult-to-treat or refractory RA)
  • Current severe comorbidity or other serious life-shortening conditions hampering trial participation
  • Inability to comply with the study protocol or to provide informed consent with regard to intervention control and measuring outcomes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: DAS28CRP-LDA
Arm that is allocated to strive for DAS28CRP low disease activity (LDA)
Other: Treatment target DAS28CRP-LDA
Aiming for DAS28CRP-low disease activity
Experimental: SDAI-remission
Arm that is allocated to strive for SDAI-remission
Other: Treatment target SDAI-remission
Aiming for SDAI-remission

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Achievement of the composite clinical/radiological remission outcome
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up time point
Achievement of the composite clinical/radiological remission outcome (radiographic progression ≤1 simple erosion narrowing score (SENS), AND, ≤1 swollen joint count, and being in PASS) at 18 months.
18 months follow-up time point

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of patients having radiographic progression (defined as > 1 simple erosion narrowing score (SENS) point) in both treatment arms
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
18 months follow-up
The number of swollen joints at 18 months follow-up
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
18 months follow-up
The proportion of patients achieving 'patient acceptable symptom state' (PASS)
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
18 months follow-up
The proportion of patients who reach the predefined target for each treatment arm (DAS28CRP-LDA or SDAI remission)
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
18 months follow-up
Percentage of patients that reach LDA or remission, using DAS28CRP- and SDAI-based definitions, in each treatment arm
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
18 months follow-up
Daily functioning, measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) will be used to measure the impact of the rheumatoid arthritis on daily functioning. A minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 60 can be scored. A higher score means a higher impact on daily functioning.
18 months follow-up
Quality of life (QoL) as defined by the 'EuroQol 5 Dimensions with 5 levels' (EQ5D-5L) questionnaire
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
This questionnaire assesses five dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension can be answered on a 5-point scale, ranging from no problems to extreme problems/unable to. A higher score means a worse outcome.
18 months follow-up
Incidence density rates of safety ((serious) adverse events, according to CTCAE criteria version 5.0)
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
18 months follow-up
Drug use of the patients, consisting of the type and volume of antirheumatic drugs (glucocorticoids, DMARDS, NSAIDs) used over the 18 months period, and at 18 months visit
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
18 months follow-up
Costs associated with medical consumption as assessed with the 'Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Medical Consumption Questionnaire' (iMCQ)
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
18 months follow-up
Costs associated with loss of productivity as measured bij the 'Institute of Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iMTA PCQ)
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
This is a short generic questionnaire that measures loss of productivity (e.g., both paid and unpaid work) due to illness or recovery.
18 months follow-up
Proportion of patients of whom the rheumatologist adhered to the local guidelines to treat the patients
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
Clinicians are encouraged to adhere to protocol upfront, and adherence is actively monitored, but treatment decisions are ultimately made using shared decision making between patients and physicians. After study completion, adherence will be assessed through a comparison of the target measurements and any changes in treatment regime made by the rheumatologists.
18 months follow-up
The incidence density rate of flares
Time Frame: 18 months follow-up
18 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sint Maartenskliniek

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alfons Den Broeder, MD, PhD, Sint Maartenskliniek

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 4, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TETRA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings