Effect of Core Training on Physical Fitness and Smash Performance Among Female Badminton Players in Guangxi, China

January 18, 2024 updated by: Ma Shuzhen
The performance of Chinese women's badminton singles players is declining to a large extent, the training of badminton in China needs to catch up, and the talent ladder has caused a fault. Badminton Routine training, the effect is not apparent . An essay on the impact of core training on athletes' skill performance was written by Luo; it proves that core strength training plays a positive role in a variety of sports; there is no study of female badminton players. Coaches or sports researchers can use this knowledge to manage the training load of badminton players better, thereby helping badminton players achieve better results in badminton training and competition.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Hibbs constructed the Model of Core Training and Potential Performance according to the theoretical framework of core strength training. This study intervention design part of the researchers referred to Greg Glassman's "CrossFit training guide" and theoretical framework of core strength training. Motion design source form Motion design source "Diversified Training to Enhance Core Strength State General Administration of sport (Sport.gov.cn)"and Khatoon wrote the article. The duration and frequency of intervention came from the review. It is found in reviewing the effect of core strength training on badminton players' performance is 8 weeks and 3 times. Therefore, this study adopted intervention for 8 weeks, 3 times a week. The subjects of this study are 18-22 years old female college elite badminton players, all of whom are national second-level and above athletes. This study employs a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (CRCT) design. The athletes were randomly assigned to two training sites and divided into experimental and control groups. The two groups had the same professional skills training content. The only difference was the physical training part. The training program of the two groups lasts 8 weeks, 3 times per week, and 1 hour per training. The experimental group performed core training, while the control group maintained routine training. In addition, the specific content of the routine training of the control group was the standard training plan of the school. The dependent variables measured in this study are physical fitness (strength, speed, endurance, agility, and flexibility) and killing the ball under different states, including in sit Smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, and back smash.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
      • Guangxi, China, 43400
        • Ma Shuzhen
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18-22 years.
  2. Chinese university female badminton players.
  3. No sports injuries, such as ankle injuries or waist injuries.
  4. Elite athlete

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Athletes who were systematically training their core strength.
  2. Athletes with sports injuries such as ankle or waist injuries.
  3. Who could not follow the entire training schedule for three months.
  4. Students who work out regularly or have hobbies for extra physical exercise.
  5. Students with physical or mental illness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Control group
The control group will follow the curriculum standards set by the Sports University.
Experimental: Experimental group
The experimental group will undergo 60 minutes of Core Training.
Other: Core straining
The experimental group received 12 weeks of core training, and the control group received 12 weeks of conventional training, 3 times/times Of the week. Each session lasts 60 minutes and includes warm-up, exercise, and relaxation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effects of strength among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Measure the distance of the standing long jump with a measuring tape in centimeters (cm).
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of endurance among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Recorded the number of jumping ropes in 1 min.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of Speed among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Use a stopwatch to record the time taken by the athlete to run 20 times with a low center of gravity (measured in seconds)
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of agility among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
The course measured 10 meters in length and 5 meters in width when it was set up on a basketball court. The start, finish line, and both turning points were indicated by four cones. Four more cones were positioned at equal intervals down the center. The distance between the central cones was 3.3 meters. To cross the finish line, the subjects were told to run as fast as they could around the course in the designated direction. Time spent recording (seconds)
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of flexibility among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Use the sit-and-reach box. The score is recorded as the point where their fingertips reach the measurement scale. The range of motion is measured in cm.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of In sit Smash among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Accuracy and velocity test
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of Jump smash among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
The athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball（km/h）. The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of move left smash among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
The athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball（km/h）. The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of move right smash among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
The athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball（km/h）. The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
Effects of back smash among college students
Time Frame: Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention
The athlete's task was to perform such a shot that the shuttlecock flew between the net and the colored string, giving the shuttlecock the highest possible velocity, Badminton subjects use their own rackets (according to the player's personal preferences) to spike the ball, test 10 balls, and record the number successful of 10 balls(times), and use a SMART BDMINTON SENSOR to record the speed of each ball（km/h）. The test process is as follows in sit smash, jump smash, move left smash, move right smash, back smash.
Pretest : before intervention Post-test 1 : 4 weeks after intervention Post-test 2 : 8 weeks after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ma Shuzhen

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: kims@upm.edu.my Soh, Universiti Putra Malaysia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 5, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 18, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Ma Shuzhen

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings