Effect of Intensive Monitoring of Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes With Different Glycemic Background

April 22, 2024 updated by: Ayse N Erbakan, Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcın City Hospital

The Effect of Close and Intensive Therapeutic Monitoring of Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes With Different Glycemic Background

In Turkey, only 55% of patients with type 2 diabetes have been diagnosed, and 91% of these patients have been receiving treatment. The rate of patients reaching the treatment target is 50%. The pandemic has also affected diabetic patients. It is aimed to determine the characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c >=10) with poor metabolic control and to evaluate the extent to which metabolic control can be achieved in 12 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Patients who applied to Istanbul Medeniyet University Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital Diabetes Polyclinics and have an HbA1c levels of >= 10% in their examinations will be admitted to the study. Detailed history, including medication usage and previous blood tests will be questioned. The patients will be asked to complete questionnaires about their eating patterns (mindful eating questionnaire), their physical activities (General practice physical activity questionnaire), and whether the participants have depression (Beck depression questionnaire). Anthropometric measurements will be taken, and biochemical data will be recorded. Patients will be grouped according to their previous HbA1c values as a) newly diagnosed, b) those whose diabetes was previously controlled, c) those whose diabetes was previously not at the target range but now worsened, and d) those whose diabetes was poorly controlled from the beginning. Diabetes follow-up will be continued by their respective physicians. The patients will be called again three months after their enrollment to record the most recent biochemical data. Patient characteristics (age, gender, educational status, depression status, eating awareness, exercise characteristics) will be evaluated in accordance with the predetermined HbA1c groups. Again, according to the patient groups, the difference in HbA1c after three months, the frequency of reaching the target, and possible factors associated with the findings will be evaluated.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
266

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Istanbul Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who have been diagnosed

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed with type 2 diabetes
  • give consent to the study
  • accessibility to the previous and recent test results

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute infection or inflammation lasting more than a week
  • acute metabolic decompensation
  • unable to attend to the follow-ups
  • having non-thyroid endocrine diseases
  • active oncologic treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Newly diagnosed diabetes
Patients who have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes within a month
Had controlled diabetes before
Patients who had at least two HbA1c levels =<%7,5 before enrollment
Had moderately uncontrolled diabetes
Patients who had at least two HbA1c levels between %7,5 and %9,49 before enrollment
Had poorly controlled diabetes
Patients who had at least two HbA1c levels above %9,5 before enrollment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in HbA1c levels after 12 months treatment
Time Frame: twelve months
Changes in HbA1c levels after 12 months treatment according to the predetermined HbA1c groups.
twelve months
percentage of patients who reached the HbA1c target of equal to or below 7%
Time Frame: twelve months
Comparison of the patient groups in their success in reaching the HbA1c target of equal to or below 7%
twelve months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effect of education on the HbA1c changes
Time Frame: twelve months
Educational status may have an impact on HbA1c reduction. Participants who have reached the HbA1c target are compared in terms of their educational level and those who have not.
twelve months
The effect of depression on the HbA1c changes
Time Frame: twelve months
The Beck Depression Index will be used to compare participants who reach the HbA1c target and those who do not
twelve months
The effect of the level of physical activity on the HbA1c changes
Time Frame: twelve months
Physical activity is graded into 4 levels. Levels will be compared in participants who reach target HbA1c level and who do not
twelve months
The effect of weight loss on the HbA1c changes
Time Frame: twelve months
The effect of weight loss on reaching HbA1c target of 7% will be compared
twelve months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcın City Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ayse N Erbakan, Goztepe Prof Dr Suleyman Yalcın City Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 22, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • : Poorly controlled T2DM-12

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings