RIC (Remote Ischemic Conditioning) in Older Individuals

July 7, 2026 updated by: Duke University

Feasibility and Acceptability of Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Achieve High-Intensity Rehabilitation Effects and Increase Resilience in Older Individuals

The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a technique called remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) that aims to improve muscle strength, muscle mass, exercise tolerance, resilience (i.e. how well someone responds to a stressor), quality of life, physical activity, and physical function when added to rehabilitative exercise training in individuals over age 65 who have some difficulty with mobility.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: ≥ 65 years and referred to an exercise program for functional decline, deconditioning, or fall risk
  2. Exercises ≤ 2x/week on a regular interval

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unstable heart disease as determined by the investigator or study physician
  2. History of any orthopaedic, neurologic, or metabolic condition that would contraindicate exercise testing/training as determined by the investigator
  3. Cognitive inability to follow directions and safely participate in exercise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: High-Dose RIC (Remote Ischemic Conditioning) Intervention
Low-intensity resistance exercise training plus high-dose RIC.
Other: Low-intensity resistance exercise training
The intervention protocol will consist of 60 minutes of low-intensity resistance exercise training 3x/week for 6 weeks.
Other: High-Dose Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC)
Treatment dose of RIC- the RIC cuff will be inflated to 20 mmHg over the participant's systolic blood pressure. The treatment dose of RIC will be applied in 4 sets of cycles with inflating the cuff and leaving it pumped for 5 minutes then deflating the cuff for an off period of 5 minutes. Total treatment time will be 35 minutes.
Placebo Comparator: Low-Dose RIC Intervention
Low-intensity resistance exercise training plus low-dose RIC.
Other: Low-intensity resistance exercise training
The intervention protocol will consist of 60 minutes of low-intensity resistance exercise training 3x/week for 6 weeks.
Other: Low-Dose Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC)
This dose will be the control for the study. Low-dose RIC- the RIC cuff will be inflated to 10 mmHg below the participant's diastolic blood pressure. The low-dose RIC will be applied in 4 sets of cycles with inflating the cuff and leaving it pumped for 5 minutes then deflating the cuff for an off period of 5 minutes. Total treatment time will be 35 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the number of participants who completed the study
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Up to 6 weeks
Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the attrition rate
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Attrition rate is expressed as a percentage and is calculated by dividing the number of non-completers by the total number of participants.
Up to 6 weeks
Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the number of exercise visits attended per participant
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Up to 6 weeks
Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the number of RIC home applications completed per participant
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Up to 6 weeks
Acceptability of study intervention as measured by an Intervention Acceptability Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Each participant will complete an Intervention Acceptability Questionnaire with responses on a 5-point Likert scale, where a higher score indicates greater acceptability.
Up to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of collecting blood samples during study as measured by the success rate of collection
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Up to 6 weeks
Change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
The SPPB measures changes in physical function.
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Change in muscle strength as measured by dynamometry
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Measurements made with isokinetic dynamometry, hand-held dynamometry and DXA scans completed at pre- and post-intervention.
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Change in exercise tolerance as measured by VO2peak testing
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Change in quality of life as measured by PROMIS-29
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Change in Brief Resilience 5-point Likert Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Higher score indicates greater resilience.
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Change in vascular function as measured by arterial tonometry
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: W Todd Cade, PhD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 7, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00115014

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings