RIC (Remote Ischemic Conditioning) in Older Individuals

December 12, 2025 updated by: Duke University

Feasibility and Acceptability of Remote Ischemic Conditioning to Achieve High-Intensity Rehabilitation Effects and Increase Resilience in Older Individuals

The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a technique called remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) that aims to improve muscle strength, muscle mass, exercise tolerance, resilience (i.e. how well someone responds to a stressor), quality of life, physical activity, and physical function when added to rehabilitative exercise training in individuals over age 65 who have some difficulty with mobility.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: ≥ 65 years and referred to an exercise program for functional decline, deconditioning, or fall risk
  2. Exercises ≤ 2x/week on a regular interval

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unstable heart disease as determined by the investigator or study physician
  2. History of any orthopaedic, neurologic, or metabolic condition that would contraindicate exercise testing/training as determined by the investigator
  3. Cognitive inability to follow directions and safely participate in exercise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: High-Dose RIC (Remote Ischemic Conditioning) Intervention
Low-intensity resistance exercise training plus high-dose RIC.
The intervention protocol will consist of 60 minutes of low-intensity resistance exercise training 3x/week for 6 weeks.
Treatment dose of RIC- the RIC cuff will be inflated to 20 mmHg over the participant's systolic blood pressure. The treatment dose of RIC will be applied in 4 sets of cycles with inflating the cuff and leaving it pumped for 5 minutes then deflating the cuff for an off period of 5 minutes. Total treatment time will be 35 minutes.
Placebo Comparator: Low-Dose RIC Intervention
Low-intensity resistance exercise training plus low-dose RIC.
The intervention protocol will consist of 60 minutes of low-intensity resistance exercise training 3x/week for 6 weeks.
This dose will be the control for the study. Low-dose RIC- the RIC cuff will be inflated to 10 mmHg below the participant's diastolic blood pressure. The low-dose RIC will be applied in 4 sets of cycles with inflating the cuff and leaving it pumped for 5 minutes then deflating the cuff for an off period of 5 minutes. Total treatment time will be 35 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the number of participants who completed the study
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Up to 6 weeks
Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the attrition rate
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Attrition rate is expressed as a percentage and is calculated by dividing the number of non-completers by the total number of participants.
Up to 6 weeks
Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the number of exercise visits attended per participant
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Up to 6 weeks
Feasibility of study intervention as measured by the number of RIC home applications completed per participant
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Up to 6 weeks
Acceptability of study intervention as measured by an Intervention Acceptability Questionnaire
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Each participant will complete an Intervention Acceptability Questionnaire with responses on a 5-point Likert scale, where a higher score indicates greater acceptability.
Up to 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of collecting blood samples during study as measured by the success rate of collection
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Up to 6 weeks
Change in Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
The SPPB measures changes in physical function.
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Change in muscle strength as measured by dynamometry
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Measurements made with isokinetic dynamometry, hand-held dynamometry and DXA scans completed at pre- and post-intervention.
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Change in exercise tolerance as measured by VO2peak testing
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Change in quality of life as measured by PROMIS-29
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Change in Brief Resilience 5-point Likert Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Higher score indicates greater resilience.
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Change in vascular function as measured by arterial tonometry
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)
Baseline to post-intervention visit (approximately 7 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: W Todd Cade, PhD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mobility Limitation

Clinical Trials on Low-intensity resistance exercise training

Subscribe