Direct Resin Composite Restoration of Primary Anterior Teeth Using Custom 3D Printed Templates (RCT)

June 27, 2024 updated by: Mina Kamal Yassa, Minia University

Direct Resin Composite Restoration of Primary Anterior Teeth Using Custom 3D Printed Templates: A 12-Month Parallel Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Esthetic restoration of primary anterior teeth is challenging. Aim of the study: Evaluation of the 12-month clinical performance of direct resin composite restoration of carious vital primary anterior teeth using custom 3D printed templates compared to conventional strip crowns. Subjects and methods: A parallel arms randomized controlled clinical trial was performed in which 98 carious vital primary anterior teeth in 32 children were directly restored with resin composite either with the help of custom 3D printed templates (Group: A) or strip crowns (Group: B). Restorations were assessed for surface luster, anatomical form, material fracture, marginal adaptation, and periodontal response using the revised FDI criteria on three occasions; a week after placement (T0), after six months (T1), and after twelve months (T2). Comparisons between groups were evaluated. A statistically significant level was considered when p value less than or equal 0.05. The tooth was the unit of analysis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The present study is a single-center randomized controlled clinical trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. This trial entailed directly restoring carious primary anterior teeth with resin composite either with the help of custom 3D printed templates obtained from digitally waxed-up patients' dental models (Group: A) or conventional strip crowns (Group: B). Restorations were assessed for clinical performance on three occasions; postoperatively (T0), after six months (T1), and after twelve months (T2).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
32

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Minya, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of at least two vital carious primary maxillary incisors.
  • Teeth had at least two carious surfaces requiring complete coronal restoration.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with malocclusion or parafunctional oral habits
  • Teeth beyond restoration.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Direct resin composite with the help of custom 3D printed templates
Directly restoring carious primary anterior teeth with resin composite with the help of custom 3D printed templates obtained from digitally waxed-up patients' dental models.
Other: Direct composite restoration of carious primary anterior teeth using custom 3D printed templates
A patient dental model is acquired by digital scan then digital waxing-up is performed using the Exocad software to 3D print clear templates for direct composite resin restoration.
Active Comparator: Direct resin composite using conventional strip crowns.
Directly restoring carious primary anterior teeth with resin composite using conventional strip crowns.
Other: Direct composite restoration of carious primary anterior teeth using conventional strip crowns
Direct composite resin restoration using celluloid crown forms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surface luster
Time Frame: On three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)
Assessment according to the revised clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations of the World Dental Federation (FDI), Each criterion was scored according to a five-step grading of the restoration that was then dichotomized into "acceptable" (for scores 1, 2&3) and "not acceptable" (for scores 4&5)
On three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)
Anatomical form
Time Frame: On three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)
Assessment according to the revised clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations of the World Dental Federation (FDI), Each criterion was scored according to a five-step grading of the restoration that was then dichotomized into "acceptable" (for scores 1, 2&3) and "not acceptable" (for scores 4&5)
On three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)
Material fracture
Time Frame: On three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)
Assessment according to the revised clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations of the World Dental Federation (FDI), Each criterion was scored according to a five-step grading of the restoration that was then dichotomized into "acceptable" (for scores 1, 2&3) and "not acceptable" (for scores 4&5)
On three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)
Marginal adaptation
Time Frame: On three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)
Assessment according to the revised clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations of the World Dental Federation (FDI), Each criterion was scored according to a five-step grading of the restoration that was then dichotomized into "acceptable" (for scores 1, 2&3) and "not acceptable" (for scores 4&5)
On three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)
Periodontal response
Time Frame: On three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)
Assessment according to the revised clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations of the World Dental Federation (FDI), Each criterion was scored according to a five-step grading of the restoration that was then dichotomized into "acceptable" (for scores 1, 2&3) and "not acceptable" (for scores 4&5)
On three occasions; a week after placement (T0), at six months (T1), and at twelve months (T2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Minia University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mina Yassa, Doctor, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 27, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • #841/2023

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings