Myofascial Release and Foot Mobility in Basketball Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute Effects of Myofascial Release on Foot Mobility and Performance in Basketball Players With Hypomobile feet-a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giresun, Turkey, 28200
- Giresun University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Basketball players who had hypomobility in at least one foot, had not had a serious foot or ankle injury in the last year, and had been actively licensed for the last five years were included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Myofascial release (MR) group
The group that received Graston myofascial application
|
Graston massage technique was used in the application.
In the application, the participant was placed in a prone position and the feet were left slightly outside the massage table.
The application was performed on the entire plantar surface between the calcaneal tuberosity and metatarsophalangeal joints in the form of multidirectional strokes at 30-60 degrees with the GT 4 graston tool.
The total application took an average of 5 minutes for each foot.
An average of 60-70 strokes were performed per minute and 10 seconds of rest was given every minute.
The application was performed as a single session by an expert physiotherapist.
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo myofascial release (PMR) group
The group that received placebo Graston myofascial application
|
Graston massage technique was used in the application.
In the application, the participant was placed in a prone position and the feet were left slightly outside the massage table.
The application was performed on the entire plantar surface between the calcaneal tuberosity and metatarsophalangeal joints in the form of multidirectional strokes at 30-60 degrees with the GT 4 graston tool.
The total application took an average of 5 minutes for each foot.
An average of 60-70 strokes were performed per minute and 10 seconds of rest was given every minute.
The application was performed as a single session by an expert physiotherapist.
Since it was a placebo application, no pressure was applied to the tissues by the physiotherapist during the strokes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
hypomobility measurement
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
Therefore, firstly, the degree of foot mobility of all participants was measured, and height and body weight measurements the balance characteristics and vertical jump levels of the participants who met the inclusion criteria were determined.
TParticipants were not informed which group they were in.
The MR group received myofascial release and the PMR group received placebo (superficial) myofascial release.
All myofascial release applications were performed by an expert physiotherapist.
After the application, the degree of foot mobility, balance characteristics and vertical jump levels of the participants were measured again.
In order to determine the duration of the acute effects of mobility after myofascial release, the MR group was subjected to a 2-hour standard basketball training after the second measurements.
Foot mobility was measured three more times at one-hour intervals in the first hour of the training, at the end of the training and then at rest.
|
6 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Height and body weight measurements
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
The height measurements of the participants were measured with wall-mounted holtain stadiometer and body weight and body mass index (BMI) measurements were measured with Tanita MC-580 body analyzer.
|
4 hours
|
|
Evaluation of foot mobility
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
The modified navicular drop (MND) test was used to assess foot mobility.
The MND test is an easy, valid and clinical method used in the evaluation of foot mobility.
In the navicular drop test, the navicular process was palpated externally while the subject was sitting on a chair with the foot in neutral position and the height above the ground was measured.
The subject was then made to stand up and place one foot on a specially designed 10.16 cm (4 inch) high box without weight.
The height above the ground of the navicular process of the loaded foot was measured again.
Feet with a difference of less than 4 mm between unweighted and weighted measurements were recorded as hypomobile.
The reference values of navicular mobility in the MND test are 0-4 mm hypomobile foot, 5-9 mm neutral foot and 10 mm or more hypermobile foot.
|
4 hours
|
|
Vertical jump measurements
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Vertical jump values were performed with arm swing countermovement jump technique using smart speed brand electronic jump mat.
The athlete took a position on the jumping mat with feet one shoulder length apart.
Then, when he felt ready, he stretched downward and jumped vertically to the highest point he could jump and fell back on the mat.
Three attempts were made in the correct position, 3 seconds rest time was allowed between each jump, and the best degree was recorded in cm.
The jumps were repeated with the knees flexed while the athlete remained in the air.
|
4 hours
|
|
Determination of balance levels
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
The balance score was calculated by summing the standard deviation of the front-to-back swing and the standard deviation of the right-to-left swing.
The multiaxial proprioceptive assessment module of the isokinetic measurement system was used to determine the dynamic balance levels.
First, the device was calibrated and the system was introduced to the volunteers.
The volunteers' feet were placed on the platform with reference to the x and y lines on the platform.
In the measuring position, the hands were drooping and the feet were bare.
Measurements were made in bipedal and 10 difficulty levels for 60 seconds.
The test was stopped and restarted when situations such as falling or touching any part of the device occurred during the measurement.
Dynamic balance levels were assessed using the average tracking error (ATE).
|
4 hours
|
|
Myofascial release application
Time Frame: 4 hour
|
Graston massage technique was used in the application.
In the application, the participant was placed in a prone position and the feet were left slightly outside the massage table.
The application was performed on the entire plantar surface between the calcaneal tuberosity and metatarsophalangeal joints in the form of multidirectional strokes at 30-60 degrees with the GT 4 graston tool.
The total application took an average of 5 minutes for each foot.
An average of 60-70 strokes were performed per minute and 10 seconds of rest was given every minute.
The application was performed as a single session by an expert physiotherapist.
|
4 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nihat SARIALİOĞLU, PhD, Giresun University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- GRU-SBF-NS-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Foot Deformities
-
NCT05437042CompletedFoot Deformities | Flatfoot | Foot; Deformity, Valgus, Congenital | Foot; Deformity, Valgus (Acquired)
-
NCT06606392Not yet recruiting
-
NCT05381558Recruiting
-
NCT07554092Recruiting
-
NCT07466043Not yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Myofascial release
-
NCT06492148RecruitingMyofascial Trigger Point Pain | Central Sensitisation | Menstrual Discomfort | Dysmenorrhea Primary | Myofascial Release
-
NCT05900934Active, not recruitingParkinson Disease | Movement Disorders | Exercise Therapy | Myofascial Release
-
NCT06017180Recruiting
-
NCT04830566Completed
-
NCT03299985CompletedGastroesophageal Reflux Disease
-
NCT07507175Recruiting
-
NCT05807438Not yet recruiting
-
NCT04401566CompletedInvestigation of Acute Effects of Myofascial Trigger Point Release in Women With Chronic Pelvic PainPelvic Pain | Myofascial Trigger Point Pain | Pelvic Floor; Relaxation
-
NCT04860726Completed