Evaluation of The Effectiveness of The SAFE Early Intervention Program
Effect of SAFE Early Intervention Program on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes At 1 Year of Age in Infants at Risk of CP
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Erzurum, Turkey
- Erzurum Technical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:• Corrected age of 3 months
- Any neurodevelopmental risk (perinatal stroke, perinatal asphyxia, HIE, GMK-IVK, PVL or gestational age of 32 and below)
Exclusion Criteria: • Having a congenital anomaly
- Having a genetic syndrome diagnosis (e.g. Down Syndrome)
- Parents do not speak Turkish
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Control Group
|
The SAFE early intervention approach, an activity-focused, sensory intervention program, was applied to the babies in the intervention group in an enriched environment.
As part of the intervention, coaching was provided in collaboration with the family on how to support the baby's development.
For this purpose, family visits were made 15 days after the initial assessment and once a month.
During these visits, the suggestions given to the family were repeated and all questions about the process were answered.
It was discussed how the home environment should be structured in a way that is appropriate for the baby's development.
The aims of the approaches applied were explained and information was provided about the follow-up process.
In order to follow up on whether the family implemented the intervention, the family was interviewed by phone and the family was asked to keep an activity diary.
Within the scope of the study, NGT-based applications were applied to the babies included in the control group by their families.
After the first assessment, activities were planned to support skills appropriate to the child's developmental level.
The treatment movements, how to facilitate the baby's movements, and how to provide hand contact were demonstrated to the families in practice.
The applicability of the intervention program was monitored with weekly phone calls.
The babies were called to the clinic environment for a check-up every month to revise the intervention program and teach new movements, and an evaluation was made.
Two home visits were made to evaluate the families' home environments and parental attitudes (pre- and post-intervention).
|
|
Experimental: SAFE Early Intervention Group
|
The SAFE early intervention approach, an activity-focused, sensory intervention program, was applied to the babies in the intervention group in an enriched environment.
As part of the intervention, coaching was provided in collaboration with the family on how to support the baby's development.
For this purpose, family visits were made 15 days after the initial assessment and once a month.
During these visits, the suggestions given to the family were repeated and all questions about the process were answered.
It was discussed how the home environment should be structured in a way that is appropriate for the baby's development.
The aims of the approaches applied were explained and information was provided about the follow-up process.
In order to follow up on whether the family implemented the intervention, the family was interviewed by phone and the family was asked to keep an activity diary.
Within the scope of the study, NGT-based applications were applied to the babies included in the control group by their families.
After the first assessment, activities were planned to support skills appropriate to the child's developmental level.
The treatment movements, how to facilitate the baby's movements, and how to provide hand contact were demonstrated to the families in practice.
The applicability of the intervention program was monitored with weekly phone calls.
The babies were called to the clinic environment for a check-up every month to revise the intervention program and teach new movements, and an evaluation was made.
Two home visits were made to evaluate the families' home environments and parental attitudes (pre- and post-intervention).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Bayley Scales of Development for Infants and Toddlers III (Bayley-III)
Time Frame: 3 months,6 months, 12 months
|
3 months,6 months, 12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 91610558-302.08.01-122723
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy
-
NCT07488429RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, Diplegic | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy With Spasticity | Transcranial Magnetic Stimilation
-
NCT07291128RecruitingAtaxic Cerebral Palsy
-
NCT07247331CompletedCerebral Palsy | Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy
-
NCT07289360RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
-
NCT07525752CompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
-
NCT07469514Not yet recruitingCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy (CP) | Infant | Cerebral Palsy Infantile
-
NCT07474818Not yet recruitingSpastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy
-
NCT07369167Not yet recruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | EEG | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy | Action Observation
-
NCT07369193RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Motor Imagery | CP (Cerebral Palsy) | Action Observation
-
NCT04231227CompletedCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia | Cerebral Palsy Quadriplegic | Cerebral Palsy, Monoplegic
Clinical Trials on Safe early intervention
-
NCT04889846CompletedInfant, Premature, Diseases
-
NCT07596147RecruitingPreterm | Neurodevelopmental Disorder (Diagnosis) | High Risk Infant
-
NCT06361134CompletedPhysiotherapy | Infant Development | Early Intervention
-
NCT03028493Completed
-
NCT06485141RecruitingSafety Issues | Firearm Injury
-
NCT06893562CompletedHip Fracture | Urinary Retention | Adherence | Urinary Catheters | Documentation Skill | UTI - Urinary Tract Infection | Sustainability of Innovations
-
NCT06363942RecruitingFrailty | Fall Injury | Old Age; Atrophy | Age-Related Atrophy | Age-Related Sarcopenia
-
NCT03070639CompletedSudden Infant Death Syndrome
-
NCT00643019CompletedSecondary Prevention | Public Health | Sexually Transmitted Disease | Behavioral Modification
-
NCT04270721RecruitingAnastomotic Leak | Anastomosis; Complications