Evaluating Cognitive Changes on Patients in Chemotherapy (ECCPC) ((ECCPC))

August 6, 2025 updated by: Dr.Tallat Mahmood,MD, Ellis Medicine
This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the impact of a structured low-intensity exercise program on cognitive function in adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The study enrolls 100 participants who are randomly assigned to either a standard care group or an exercise intervention group. Cognitive function is measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline, 6, 9, and 12 months. Participants in the intervention group are instructed to double their baseline daily step count, tracked via pedometer, while those in the control group maintain their usual activity. All patients are given the pedometer for one week prior to the start of chemo to monitor their step count and determine their baseline. The study also collects self-reported data on cognitive difficulties and psychological well-being. The primary objective is to determine whether regular physical activity mitigates chemotherapy-related cognitive decline ("chemo brain") and whether MoCA scores correlate with patients' subjective experiences. This low-cost, home-based approach may offer an accessible strategy for preserving cognitive function during cancer treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a well-documented side effect of cancer treatment, yet its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood and effective interventions are lacking. Emerging evidence suggests that physical activity may mitigate cognitive decline through improvements in neuroplasticity, cerebral blood flow, and reduction of inflammation-driven neurotoxicity. This study builds on that foundation by integrating both objective and subjective measures of cognitive function to better capture the patient experience. A mixed-effects ANCOVA model will be used to assess treatment effects over time, with additional analyses exploring the relationship between adherence to the exercise regimen and cognitive outcomes. By leveraging a low-cost, accessible intervention and including diverse demographic and psychosocial factors, this trial aims to inform future strategies for managing CRCI and improving long-term quality of life for cancer patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Schenectady, New York, United States, 12308
        • Ellis Medicine/Roswell Park Medical Oncology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Age 18 years and older.

    • Patients with histologically confirmed malignancy who are planning on receiving chemotherapy.
    • Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
    • ECOG performance status less than or equal to 2.
    • Patients willing and able to perform the exercise as directed.
    • Patients with the ability to walk without use of an assistive device.
    • Patients with no underlying psychiatric disorder (other than depression, as long as there has been no acute presentation within 6 months of being enrolled in the study).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Under the age of 18 years.

    • Patients unable to provide informed consent.
    • Patients who are non-ambulatory or who have a physical disability preventing exercise.
    • ECOG performance status greater than 2.
    • Patients with a psychiatric diagnosis (other than depression)
    • Patients with a diagnosis of dementia of any type.
    • Patients with a neurologic disorder that one could reasonably assume to have an underlying cognitive impairment.
    • Patients with a history of traumatic brain injury.
    • Patients who will be on chemotherapy for longer than 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Low-Intensity Walking Intervention
Participants in this arm are asked to double their baseline daily step count ( which will be assessed for one week prior to start of chemo) using a pedometer. This low-intensity walking program is implemented alongside standard chemotherapy treatment with the aim of improving cognitive outcomes. Cognitive function is assessed using the MoCA at four time points (baseline and at three follow-up intervals during the study). Study staff provide regular monitoring and encouragement to help participants reach their step goals, making adjustments as needed to ensure safety and adherence.
Behavioral: Low-Intensity Walking Intervention
Participants in the experimental group will be asked to take part in a home-based, walking program. Each participant will receive a pedometer and will be instructed to increase their baseline daily step count by 100%. For example, if a participant typically walks 3,000 steps per day, they will be asked to increase their activity to 6,000 steps per day. Step counts will be regularly monitored, and participants will receive encouragement and support from study staff to help maintain adherence to the walking goals. In addition to the exercise intervention, participants in this group will undergo cognitive testing using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at four timepoints: baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months. They will also complete self-reported questionnaires related to cognitive function at these same intervals. This group is designed to evaluate whether increased physical activity can improve or preserve cognitive function in patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Other: Standard of Care (Control)
Participants in this arm receive standard care during chemotherapy with no additional exercise intervention. They wear a pedometer for baseline step-count tracking but are not instructed to increase their activity beyond normal daily routines. This group serves as a comparison for the walking intervention group while maintaining usual activity levels. MoCA assessments are conducted at the same four scheduled time points (mirroring the experimental arm's schedule) to evaluate cognitive function without the influence of a prescribed exercise program.
Behavioral: Control Group Intervention
Participants in the control group will receive standard care and will not be given any specific exercise instructions. They will be provided with pedometers to track their daily steps, but they will not be asked to increase or change their usual level of physical activity. These participants will continue with their routine activities and cancer care as directed by their treating physicians. Like the intervention group, they will complete the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months, as well as self-reported questionnaires about cognitive function at each timepoint. This group will serve as a comparator to determine the impact of the walking intervention on cognitive outcomes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cognitive Function as Measured by MoCA Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
This outcome evaluates whether cognitive decline associated with chemotherapy ("chemo brain") can be measured using the MoCA, a brief and validated tool suitable for clinical settings. The goal is to determine if MoCA can effectively detect changes in cognitive performance over the course of chemotherapy without the need for extensive neuropsychological testing.
Baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation Between MoCA Scores and Self-Reported Cognitive Difficulties
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
This outcome examines how well participants' MoCA scores align with their own self-reported cognitive difficulties. Self-reported data will be collected using a structured questionnaire to capture subjective experiences of memory, attention, and mental clarity. The analysis will assess whether objective cognitive test results reflect participants' perceived impairments.
Baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ellis Medicine

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tallat Mahmood, MD, Ellis Medicine/ Roswell Park

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 9, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 20, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 20, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 22, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 6, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Other Identifier: No secondary ID

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings