Development of a Quantifiable Ultrasound Biomarker for Hepatic Steatosis (LYNX)

November 26, 2025 updated by: ContextVision AB

Development and Diagnostic Evaluation of a Novel Quantifiable Ultrasound Based Multi-parametric Biomarker for Hepatic Steatosis in Patients With Suspected MASLD ( LYNX )

The research study is considering a non-invasive way to measure the percentage of fat in the liver using ultrasound. This could help detect early signs of a very common condition called metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Current tests, like MRI or biopsy, can be expensive or invasive. If successful, this ultrasound tool could become an easier and more accessible way to monitor liver health - especially for people with obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, or high cholesterol.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The objective is to develop a novel multiparametric ultrasound-based technique to quantify the amount of steatosis in the liver by using the current MRI-based gold-standard - MRI proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as a clinical reference. This clinical development study will only collect the required dataset from healthy volunteers and subjects with different degrees of steatosis in the liver, particularly patients with MASLD, formerly non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It will capture the raw radiofrequency data required for the development of this new radiologic biomarker on a research ultrasound imaging device. In addition, various other clinical and radiological datasets will be captured to support the ground truthing, development and training of the novel ultrasound-based multiparametric biomarker.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Laura Sissons-Ross Research Manager
  • Phone Number: 206-616-0397
  • Email: lsissons@uw.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • Recruiting
        • University of Washington
        • Contact:
          • Research Fellow
          • Phone Number: 206-616-0397
          • Email: madhvi@uw.edu
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rotonya Carr, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Manish Dhyani, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Diseased subject:

  • Adult patients (age 18 - 75 years)
  • Consent to participate in the study
  • Diagnosed or suspected MASLD from the hepatology clinic, OR
  • High-risk population meeting the adult cardiometabolic criteria (defined as the presence of at least one of the following: diabetes, obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension)

Healthy volunteer:

  • Adult patients (age 18 - 75 years)
  • Consent to participate in the study
  • No suspicion of MASLD by laboratory/imaging/clinical examinations
  • Absence of known pre-existing conditions (metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, etc.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or nursing.
  • Contraindications to MRI including, but not limited to, severe claustrophobia, pacemaker, or existing metallic/mechanical implant(s).
  • Acute illness/cognitive impairment resulting in an inability to cooperate with the MRI and ultrasound breath-holding instructions.
  • BMI > 35 kg/m2
  • History of excessive alcohol consumption according to the updated MASLD criteria (>2 drinks/day OR >210 grams/week for males AND >1 drink/day OR >140 grams/week for females) or drug use over the past 2 years.
  • Known acute or chronic hepatitis; or other etiology of liver disease.
  • Presence of known congenital hepatic anomaly.
  • Known cirrhosis
  • Known active cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cohort
Adult healthy volunteers as well as subjects who have a diagnosis, or suspected, of having MASLD or are deemed to meet the high-risk cardiometabolic criteria.
Device: Verasonics NXT Data Acquisition System

A research ultrasound imaging device to capture raw radiofrequency ultrasound data for the following parameters:

  • B-mode imaging
  • Attenuation coefficient
  • Backscatter coefficient
  • Speed of sound
  • Shear wave elastography
Device: Philips EPIQ Elite
A premium ultrasound system with software package to support imaging research studies.
Device: EchoSense FibroScan
A non-invasive ultrasound solution that accurately measures liver stiffness and liver steatosis.
Device: Philips 3T Ingenia Elition
A 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Multiparametric Ultrasound Biomarker vs. MR-PDFF
Time Frame: 1 year
Clinical qualification of the multiparametric ultrasound-derived fat fraction, defined as its agreement with the established clinical reference, MRI proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) expressed as absolute percentage, in bench testing analysis.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Individual Ultrasound parameter vs. MRI-PDFF
Time Frame: 1 year
Evaluation of each ultrasound parameter (backscatter, attenuation and speed of sound) fat percentage values separately against MRI-PDFF.
1 year
Ultrasound Shear Wave vs MR Elastography
Time Frame: 1 year
Evaluation of ultrasound shear wave elastography-derived tissue stiffness values in kilopascals compared to MR elastography.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
ContextVision AB

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • COV-POCUS-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings