Safety and Efficacy Trial With Zoledronic Acid for the Treatment of Paget's Disease of Bone, Including an Extended Observation Period

May 29, 2012 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Randomized, Double-Blind, Safety and Efficacy Trial With Intravenous Zoledronic Acid for the Treatment of Paget's Disease of Bone Using Risedronate as a Comparator, Including an Extended Observation Period

The primary objective of this core study was to show non-inferiority of zoledronic acid to risedronate, with respect to the proportion of patients who achieved therapeutic response. The extended observation period included participants of the core study who responded to treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

185

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Fitzroy, Australia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kogarah, Australia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Newcastle, Australia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Parkville, Australia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • St. Leonards, Australia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Gent, Belgium
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Montreal, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Angers, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dreux Cedex, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Marseille, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nice Cedex, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Paris Cedex, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Rouen Cedex, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Toulouse, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Frankfurt, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leverkusen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wirzburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Christchurch, New Zealand
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Cape Town, South Africa
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Malaga, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Salamanca, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Liverpool, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Oxford, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85732
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80901
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • New York
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13210
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Oregon
      • Medford, Oregon, United States, 97504
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • South Carolina
      • Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29209
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53592
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 30 years or older
  • SAP 2 times ULN
  • Confirmed diagnosis of Paget's disease of the bone (by x-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomography, radioisotope imaging, etc.).
  • 90 days washout calcitonin
  • 180 day washout bisphosphonate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic reaction to bisphosphonates
  • History of upper GI disorders
  • History of iritis, uveitis
  • Calculated creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min at baseline
  • Evidence of vitamin D deficiency

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Zoledronic acid and placebo to risedronate
Participants received zoledronic acid 5.0 mg i.v. infusion one dose, 60 days of oral placebo to risedronate, calcium 500mg bid and vitamin D 400 to 1000 IU daily during the core period, and received only calcium and vitamin D supplements during the extended observation period.
5 mg zoledronic acid in 5 mL of sterile water for infusion
oral capsules
Calcium and vitamin D supplements were supplied
Active Comparator: Risedronate and placebo to zoledronic acid
Participants received 60 days of oral risedronate 30 mg, one i.v. infusion of placebo to zoledronic acid infusion, calcium 500mg bid and vitamin d 400 to 1000 IU daily during the core period, and received only calcium and vitamin D supplements during the extended observation period.
Calcium and vitamin D supplements were supplied
5 mL of sterile water for infusion
30mg oral tablets overencapsulated to match the placebo capsules

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Who Had Therapeutic Response at 6 Months
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months
A therapeutic response was defined as a reduction of at least 75% from baseline (Visit 1) in serum alkaline phosphatase (SAP) excess (difference between measured level and midpoint to the normal range) or normalization of SAP at the end of six months.
Baseline, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative Change in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase in U/L at Day 28
Time Frame: Baseline and 28 days
The percent change in serum alkaline phosphatase from baseline to Day 28 was measured.
Baseline and 28 days
Relative Change in Serum C-telopeptide (CTx) in ng/mL at Day 10
Time Frame: Baseline and day 10
The percent change in serum C-telopeptide from baseline to Day 10 was measured.
Baseline and day 10
Relative Change in Urine α-CTx in ug/mmol at Day 10
Time Frame: Baseline and day 10
The percent change in urine α-CTx from baseline to Day 10 was measured.
Baseline and day 10
Time to First Therapeutic Response
Time Frame: 182 days
Therapeutic response was defined as a reduction of at least 75% from baseline in serum alkaline phosphatase excess (difference between measured level and midpoint to the normal range) or normalization of serum alkaline phosphatase.
182 days
Number of Patients Who Achieved Serum Alkaline Phosphatase Normalization at Day 28
Time Frame: Day 28
Normalization of serum alkaline phosphatase occurred if the serum alkaline phosphatase measurement fell within the normal range. Central laboratory reference ranges for serum alkaline phosphatase: 31-110 U/L (female & male 20-58 years) and 35-115 U/L (female & male >58 years).
Day 28
Change in Pain Severity at Day 182
Time Frame: Baseline and day 182
Change in pain severity score from Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). This scale values are 0 to 10, a lower score means little to no pain while a higher score means greater pain.
Baseline and day 182
Change in Pain Interference at Day 182
Time Frame: Baseline and day 182
Change in pain interference score from Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). This scale values are 0 to 10, a lower score means little to no pain while a higher score means greater pain.
Baseline and day 182
Number of Participants With a Loss of Therapeutic Response During the Extended Observation Period
Time Frame: 8 years was the maximum
Extended observation period. A therapeutic response is defined as a reduction of at least 75% from baseline in serum alkaline phosphatase excess or normalization of serum alkaline phosphatase.
8 years was the maximum
Number of Participants With a Partial Disease Relapse During the Extended Observation Period
Time Frame: 8 years was the maximum
Extended observation period. A partial disease relapse was defined as an increase in serum alkaline phosphatase >= 50% from the serum alkaline phosphatase measurement at Month 6 and at least 1.25 times the upper normal limit.
8 years was the maximum
Number of Participants With a Disease Relapse During the Extended Observation Period
Time Frame: 8 years was maximum
Extended observation period. A disease relapse was defined as the occurrence of a serum alkaline phosphatase level that was >= 80% of baseline serum alkaline phosphatase value.
8 years was maximum

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2003

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

February 15, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 4, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2012

Last Verified

May 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Paget's Disease of Bone

Clinical Trials on zoledronic acid

Subscribe