- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00180479
SPIRIT III Clinical Trial of the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (EECSS)
SPIRIT III: A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (EECSS) in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions
This study is divided into 5 arms:
- Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT): Prospective, randomized, active-controlled, single blind, parallel two-arm multi-center clinical trial in the United States (US) comparing XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (CSS) (2.5, 3.0, 3.5 mm diameter stents) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved commercially available active control TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent (TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ PECS) System
- US 2.25 mm non-randomized arm using 2.25 mm diameter XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting CSS
- US 4.0 mm non-randomized arm using 4.0 mm diameter XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting CSS
- US 38 mm non-randomized arm using 38 mm in length XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting CSS
- Japanese non-randomized arm using XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting CSS (2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 mm diameter stents) in Japan
The TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System is Manufactured by Boston Scientific.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The purpose of the SPIRIT III clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (XIENCE V® EECSS). The XIENCE V® EECS (XIENCE V® arm) will be compared to an active control group represented by the FDA approved commercially available Boston Scientific TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stent (TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ PECS) System (TAXUS® arm).
The SPIRIT III clinical trial consists of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in the US which will enroll approximately 1,002 subjects (2:1 randomization XIENCE V® EECS : TAXUS® EXPRESS2™ PECS) with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesion treatment within vessel sizes >= 2.5 mm and <= 3.75 mm.
The SPIRIT III clinical trial also consists of three concurrent US non-randomized arms (2.25 mm diameter stent, 4.0 mm diameter stent and 38 mm length stent arms) and one Japanese non-randomized arm as follows:
- 105 subjects with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesion within vessel sizes > 2.25 mm and < 2.5 mm and lesion length <= 22 mm will be enrolled concurrently in the US 2.25 mm non-randomized treatment arm
- 80 subjects with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesion within vessel sizes > 3.75 mm and >= 4.25 mm and lesion length <= 28 mm will be enrolled concurrently in the US 4.0 mm non-randomized treatment arm
- 105 subjects with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesion within vessel sizes > 3.0 mm and < 4.25 mm and lesion length > 24 mm and < 32 mm will be enrolled concurrently in the US 38 mm non-randomized treatment arm.
- 88 Japanese subjects with a maximum of two de novo native coronary artery lesions within vessel sizes >= 2.5 mm and <= 4.25 mm and lesion length <= 28 mm will be enrolled concurrently in the non-randomized Japanese arm.
All subjects in the RCT and the four non-randomized arms will be screened per the protocol required inclusion/exclusion criteria. The data collected will be compared to data from the subjects enrolled into the TAXUS® arm of US RCT.
Subjects enrolled in the US RCT will be sub-grouped based on whether they will have an angiographic and/or an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up at 240 days as follows:
Group A: Angiographic and IVUS follow-up at 240 days (N=240) Group B: Angiographic follow-up at 240 days (N=324) Group C: No angiographic or IVUS follow-up (N=438)
All subjects will have clinical follow-up at 30, 180, 240 and 270 days (Data collected through 270 days will be submitted as the primary data set for US and Japanese market approval), and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years (for annual reports).
All subjects enrolled into three US non-randomized arms (N=105 for 2.25 mm arm, N=80 for 4.0 mm arm and N=105 for 38 mm stent arm) will have clinical follow-up at 30, 180, 240, and 270 days, and angiographic follow-up at 240 days. No IVUS follow-up is required for subjects enrolled in these arms.
All subjects enrolled into the Japanese non-randomized arm (N=88) will have clinical follow-up at 30, 180, 240, and 270 days, and angiographic and IVUS follow-up at 240 days.
All subjects who receive a bailout stent will be assigned to Group A follow-up subgroup (angiographic and IVUS follow-up at 240 days after the index procedure), regardless of their primary assignment at randomization. At sites without IVUS capability, subjects receiving bailout stent will be assigned to Group B follow-up subgroup (angiographic follow-up at 240 days after the index procedure). Angiographic follow-up is required for all bailout subjects at 240 days.
Data from the US RCT will be submitted to the FDA as the primary data set for product approval for RVD >= 2.5 mm and <= 3.75 mm (2.5 mm, 3.0 mm and 3.5 mm stents). Combined data of the US trial/Japanese non-randomized arm will be submitted to the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) for Japanese approval for RVD>=2.5 mm and <= 4.25 mm (2.5 mm, 3.0 mm 3.5 mm and 4.0 mm stents). Data from the Japanese non-randomized arm will be submitted to the FDA as additional safety data. Data from the US non-randomized arms of the trial will be the primary data sets for approval for 2.25 mm diameter stent (RVD > 2.25 mm and < 2.5 mm), 4.0 mm diameter stent (RVD > 3.75 mm and <= 4.25 mm) and 38 mm length stent (RVD > 3.0 mm and <= 4.25 mm and lesion length > 24 mm and <= 32 mm), respectively in the US.
A pharmacokinetic substudy will be carried out in a minimum of 5 pre-determined sites in the US and a minimum of 5 pre-determined sites in Japan. In the US, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of everolimus, as delivered by the XIENCE V® EECS will be analyzed in a subset of 15 subjects (minimum) with single vessel/lesion treatment, and up to 20 subjects with dual vessel/lesion treatment, respectively. In Japan, a minimum of 10 subjects with single vessel/lesion treatment and up to 20 subjects with dual vessel/lesion treatment will have a PK measurements performed. These subsets will include subjects receiving overlapping stents.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35211
- Baptist Medical Center Princeton
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35213
- Baptist Health System - Montclair
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85016
- Arizona Heart Hospital
-
-
California
-
La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
- Scripps Memorial Hospital
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 87106
- Good Samaritan Hospital
-
Oakland, California, United States, 94609
- Alta Bates Summit Medical Center
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95819
- Mercy General Hospital
-
-
Colorado
-
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States, 80528
- Poudre Valley Hospital
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
- Washington Hospital Center
-
-
Florida
-
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 33308
- Holy Cross Medical Center (prev. North Ridge MC)
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33176
- Baptist Hospital of Miami
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
- Piedmont Hospital
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30342
- Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
- Emory Crawford Long Hospital
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- Rush University Medical Center
-
Elmhurst, Illinois, United States, 60148
- Elmhurst Memorial Hospital
-
Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62701
- St. John's Hospital
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46290
- The Heart Center of IN, LLC
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
- Jewish Hospital
-
-
Louisiana
-
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
- Ochsner Clinic Foundation
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Hospital
-
Takoma Park, Maryland, United States, 20912
- Washington Adventist Hospital
-
Towson, Maryland, United States, 21204
- St. Joseph Medical Center
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
- Brigham & Women's Hospital
-
-
Michigan
-
Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48236
- St John Hospital & Medical Center
-
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
- Spectrum Health Hospital
-
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States, 49048
- Borgess Medical Center
-
Petoskey, Michigan, United States, 49770
- Northern Michigan Hospital
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55407
- Abbott Northwestern Hospital
-
-
Mississippi
-
Tupelo, Mississippi, United States, 38801
- North Mississippi Medical Center
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
- St. Luke's Hospital
-
St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
- Barnes Jewish Hospital
-
-
Montana
-
Missoula, Montana, United States, 59802
- St. Patrick Hospital
-
-
Nebraska
-
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68526
- Nebraska Heart Hospital
-
-
New Hampshire
-
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
-
-
New Jersey
-
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
- Hackensack Medical Center
-
Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States, 07450
- The Valley Hospital
-
-
New Mexico
-
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 28204
- Presbyterian Hospital
-
-
New York
-
New Hyde Park, New York, United States, 11040
- Long Island Jewish Medical Center
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Columbia University Medical Center
-
Syracuse, New York, United States, 13203
- St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center
-
-
North Carolina
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 87106
- Presbyterian Hospital
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
- Duke University Medical Center
-
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27610
- Wake Medical Center
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
- Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
- The Christ Hospital
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43214
- Riverside Methodist Hospital
-
Elyria, Ohio, United States, 44035
- EMH Regional Medical Center
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
- The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73112
- Integris Baptist Medical, Inc.
-
-
Oregon
-
Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
- Sacred Heart Medical Center
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97225
- Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States, 17043
- Pinnacle Health @ Harrisburg Hospital
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15212
- Allegheny General Hospital
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
- The Miriam Hospital
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
- Rhode Island Hospital
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29403
- Medical University of South Carolina
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78756
- Heart Hospital of Austin
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75230
- Medical City Dallas Hospital
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Methodist Hospital
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78215
- TexSAn Heart Hospital
-
-
Vermont
-
Burlington, Vermont, United States, 05401
- Fletcher Allen Health Care
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
- Swedish Medical Center
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53215
- St. Luke's Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Target lesion(s) must be located in a native epicardial vessel with visually estimated diameter between >= 2.25 mm and <= 4.25 mm and a lesion length <= 32 mm
- The target lesion(s) must be in a major artery or branch with a visually estimated stenosis of >= 50% and < 100% with a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow of >= 1
- Non-study, percutaneous intervention for lesions in a non-target vessel is allowed if done >= 90 days prior to the index procedure (subjects who received brachytherapy will be excluded from the trial)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Located within an arterial or saphenous vein graft or distal to a diseased (vessel irregularity per angiogram and > 20% stenosed lesion by visual estimation) arterial or saphenous vein graft
- Lesion involving a bifurcation >= 2 mm in diameter or ostial lesion > 50% stenosed by visual estimation or side branch requiring predilatation
- Located in a major epicardial vessel that has been previously treated with brachytherapy
- Located in a major epicardial vessel that has been previously treated with percutaneous intervention < 9 months prior to index procedure
- Total occlusion (TIMI flow 0), prior to wire passing
- The target vessel contains thrombus
- Another significant lesion (> 40% diameter stenosis [DS]) is located in the same epicardial vessel as the target lesion
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 1
XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
Drug eluting stent implantation stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: 2
TAXUS® EXPRESS2™Paclitaxel Eluting Coronary Stent System
|
Drug eluting stent implantation stent in the treatment of coronary artery disease.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Primary Endpoint: In-segment Late Loss (LL)
Time Frame: 240 days
|
In-segment minimal lumen diameter (MLD) post-procedure minus (-) in segment MLD at 240 day follow-up and 5 mm proximal and 5mm distal to the stent equals Late Loss.
MLD defined: The average of two orthogonal views (when possible) of the narrowest point within the area of assessment.
|
240 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Major Secondary Endpoint: Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Failure (ID-TVF)
Time Frame: 270 days
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
270 days
|
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
30 days
|
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 180 days
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
180 days
|
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
1 year
|
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 2 year
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
2 year
|
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 3 year
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
3 year
|
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 4 year
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
4 year
|
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study |
30 days
|
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 180 days
|
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study |
180 days
|
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 270 days
|
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study |
270 days
|
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 1 years
|
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study |
1 years
|
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study |
2 years
|
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 3 year
|
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study |
3 year
|
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 4 year
|
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study |
4 year
|
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following
Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events |
30 days
|
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 180 days
|
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following
Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events |
180 days
|
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 270 days
|
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following
Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events |
270 days
|
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following
Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events |
1 year
|
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following
Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events |
2 years
|
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following
Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events |
3 years
|
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 4 years
|
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following
Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events |
4 years
|
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
30 days
|
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 180 days
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
180 days
|
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 270 days
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
270 days
|
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
1 year
|
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event(MACE)
Time Frame: 2 years
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
2 years
|
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 3 year
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
3 year
|
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 4 year
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
4 year
|
In-stent % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate
Time Frame: at 240 days
|
Percent of subjects with a follow-up in-stent percent diameter stenosis of ≥ 50% per quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)
|
at 240 days
|
In-segment % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate
Time Frame: 240 days
|
Percent of subjects with a follow-up in-segment percent diameter stenosis of ≥ 50% per QCA
|
240 days
|
Persisting Incomplete Stent Apposition, Late-acquired Incomplete Stent Apposition, Aneurysm, Thrombosis, and Persisting Dissection
Time Frame: at 240 days
|
Incomplete Apposition (Persisting & Late acquired): Failure to completely appose vessel wall w/ ≥1 strut separated from vessel wall w/ blood behind strut per ultrasound. Aneurysm: Abnormal vessel expansion ≥ 1.5 of reference vessel diameter. Thrombus: Protocol & ARC definition. Persisting dissection @ follow-up, present post-procedure. |
at 240 days
|
Acute Success: Clinical Device
Time Frame: In-hospital
|
Successful delivery and deployment of 1st implanted study stent/s @ the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the stent delivery system with final residual stenosis < 50%.
|
In-hospital
|
Acute Success: Clinical Procedure
Time Frame: In-hospital
|
Successful delivery and deployment of study stent/s @ the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the stent delivery system with final residual stenosis < 50%.
|
In-hospital
|
Proximal Late Loss
Time Frame: at 240 days
|
Proximal Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD) post-procedure minus proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to stent placement)
|
at 240 days
|
Distal Late Loss
Time Frame: 240 days
|
Distal MLD post-procedure minus distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to stent placement)
|
240 days
|
In-stent Late Loss
Time Frame: at 240 days
|
In-stent MLD post-procedure minus in-stent MLD at follow-up (in-stent defined as within the margins of the stent)
|
at 240 days
|
% Volume Obstruction (% VO)
Time Frame: at 240 days
|
Defined as stent intimal hyperplasia and calculated as 100*(Stent Volume - Lumen Volume)/Stent Volume by IVUS.
|
at 240 days
|
In-stent % Diameter Stenosis (% DS)
Time Frame: at 240 days
|
In-stent: Within the margins of the stent, the value calculated as 100 * (1 - in-stent MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.
|
at 240 days
|
In-segment % Diameter Stenosis (% DS)
Time Frame: 240 days
|
Within the margins of the stent, 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the stent, the value calculated as 100 * (1 - in-segment MLD/RVD) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by QCA.
|
240 days
|
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
5 years
|
Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Revascularization @ target lesion associated w/ any of following: (+) functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) Revascularization of a target lesion w/ angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or (+) functional study |
5 years
|
Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following
Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events |
5 years
|
Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 5 years
|
The composite endpoint comprised of:
|
5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gregg W Stone, MD, Columbia University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Williams J, Farhat N, Mahaffey KW, Cutlip DE, Fitzgerald PJ, Sood P, Su X, Lansky AJ; SPIRIT III Investigators. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008 Apr 23;299(16):1903-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.16.1903.
- Stone GW, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Hermiller JB, Williams J, Farhat N, Caputo R, Xenopoulos N, Applegate R, Gordon P, White RM, Sudhir K, Cutlip DE, Petersen JL; SPIRIT III Investigators. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents: two-year clinical follow-up from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) III trial. Circulation. 2009 Feb 10;119(5):680-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.803528. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
- Lansky AJ, Ng VG, Mutlu H, Cristea E, Guiran JB, Midei M, Newman W, Sanz M, Sood P, Doostzadeh J, Su X, White R, Cao S, Sudhir K, Stone GW. Gender-based evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system: clinical and angiographic results from the SPIRIT III randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 1;74(5):719-27. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22067.
- Genereux P, Rutledge DR, Palmerini T, Caixeta A, Kedhi E, Hermiller JB, Wang J, Krucoff MW, Jones-McMeans J, Sudhir K, Simonton CA, Serruys PW, Stone GW. Stent Thrombosis and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Interruption With Everolimus-Eluting Stents: Insights From the Xience V Coronary Stent System Trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;8(5):e001362. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001362.
- Muramatsu T, Onuma Y, van Geuns RJ, Chevalier B, Patel TM, Seth A, Diletti R, Garcia-Garcia HM, Dorange CC, Veldhof S, Cheong WF, Ozaki Y, Whitbourn R, Bartorelli A, Stone GW, Abizaid A, Serruys PW; ABSORB Cohort B Investigators; ABSORB EXTEND Investigators; SPIRIT FIRST Investigators; SPIRIT II Investigators; SPIRIT III Investigators; SPIRIT IV Investigators. 1-year clinical outcomes of diabetic patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: a pooled analysis of the ABSORB and the SPIRIT trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):482-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.155. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
- Claessen BE, Smits PC, Kereiakes DJ, Parise H, Fahy M, Kedhi E, Serruys PW, Lansky AJ, Cristea E, Sudhir K, Sood P, Simonton CA, Stone GW. Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov;4(11):1209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.016.
- Planer D, Smits PC, Kereiakes DJ, Kedhi E, Fahy M, Xu K, Serruys PW, Stone GW. Comparison of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with acute and stable coronary syndromes: pooled results from the SPIRIT (A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (A Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization in Daily Practice) Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct;4(10):1104-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.06.018.
- Kereiakes DJ, Sudhir K, Hermiller JB, Gordon PC, Ferguson J, Yaqub M, Sood P, Su X, Yakubov S, Lansky AJ, Stone GW. Comparison of everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents in patients undergoing multilesion and multivessel intervention: the SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT IV (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec;3(12):1229-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.014.
- Caixeta A, Lansky AJ, Serruys PW, Hermiller JB, Ruygrok P, Onuma Y, Gordon P, Yaqub M, Miquel-Hebert K, Veldhof S, Sood P, Su X, Jonnavithula L, Sudhir K, Stone GW; SPIRIT II and III Investigators. Clinical follow-up 3 years after everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a pooled analysis from the SPIRIT II (A Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) and SPIRIT III (A Clinical Evaluation of the Investigational Device XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [EECSS] in the Treatment of Subjects With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Dec;3(12):1220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.07.017.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Heart Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Arteriosclerosis
- Arterial Occlusive Diseases
- Embolism and Thrombosis
- Coronary Disease
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Myocardial Ischemia
- Vascular Diseases
- Ischemia
- Thrombosis
- Coronary Occlusion
- Coronary Stenosis
- Coronary Restenosis
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Immunologic Factors
- Tubulin Modulators
- Antimitotic Agents
- Mitosis Modulators
- Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
- Paclitaxel
- Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel
- Everolimus
Other Study ID Numbers
- 03-360
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Myocardial Ischemia
-
Recardio, Inc.CompletedAcute Myocardial Infarction | STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction | Acute Myocardial IschemiaNetherlands, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Belgium
-
University of Roma La SapienzaCompletedRosuvastatin in Preventing Myonecrosis in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCIs) (ROMA)Periprocedural Myocardial NecrosisItaly
-
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian...CompletedMyocardial Infarction | Myocardial Injury | STEMI | Myocardial NecrosisRussian Federation
-
Lokien van NunenMaquet Cardiovascular; Stichting Toegepaste Wetenschappen (project number 11052)CompletedAcute Myocardial Infarction | Persisting Ischemia | No ReflowNetherlands
-
University Hospital "Sestre Milosrdnice"CompletedSTEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction | Myocardial ReperfusionCroatia
-
Fundacio Privada Mon Clinic BarcelonaMiracor Medical SANot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital, ToulouseThoratec CorporationWithdrawnChronic Myocardial IschemiaFrance
-
Deutsches Herzzentrum MuenchenCompletedInfarction, MyocardialGermany
-
Barts & The London NHS TrustUniversity College, London; Queen Mary University of LondonCompletedAcute Myocardial InfarctionSwitzerland, Denmark, United Kingdom
-
Gennaro SardellaCompletedAssess the Periprocedural Myocardial NecrosisItaly
Clinical Trials on XIENCE V® Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Coronary Disease | Coronary RestenosisIndia
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Coronary Disease | Coronary RestenosisIreland, Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, China, Belgium, Switzerland, Thailand, Israel, Germany, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Italy, Malaysia, Canada, India, Austria, France, South Africa, Portugal, Czech Republic, Greece, Sweden
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Coronary Disease | Coronary RestenosisNetherlands, Spain, Denmark, Germany, France, Austria, Belgium, India, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, South Africa, Switzerland
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedCoronary Artery DiseaseUnited States
-
Medtronic VascularMedtronic Bakken Research CenterCompletedCoronary Artery DiseaseSwitzerland
-
European HospitalCompletedChronic Kidney Disease | Multivessel Coronary Artery DiseaseItaly
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedCoronary Artery DiseaseUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesTerminatedCoronary Artery DiseaseNetherlands, Australia, Singapore, China
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMyocardial Ischemia | Coronary Artery Disease | Coronary Disease | Stent Thrombosis | Coronary Restenosis | Chronic Coronary Occlusion | Vascular Disease | Coronary Artery Stenosis | AngioplastyUnited States
-
Odense University HospitalCompletedIschemic Heart Disease | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention | Coronary AtherosclerosisDenmark