Viral Dynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Abacavir and Tenofovir

September 23, 2021 updated by: University of California, San Diego

CCTG584: Viral Dynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Tenofovir and Abacavir Monotherapy Versus the Combination Therapy of TDF-ABC in HIV-Infected Treatment Naive Patients

Once-daily nucleotide/nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NtRTI/NRTI) combinations form the backbone of many regimens. Although efficacy data exists between tenofovir and the pyrimidine analogues (i.e. lamivudine and emtricitabine), recent clinical data suggests a potential interaction between tenofovir and purine analogs (i.e. abacavir and didanosine).

Specific Aim 1: To evaluate the impact of an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate, tenofovir (TDF), on the intracellular metabolism of a purine nucleoside analog, abacavir (ABC), as a determinant of the antiviral potency of this nucleotide/nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NtRTI/NRTI) combination.

  • Hypothesis #1: ABC and TDF dosed together will have reduced antiviral activity, as measured by early plasma HIV RNA decay kinetics, than the drugs given alone.
  • Hypothesis #2: ABC dosed with TDF will have reduced intracellular concentrations, as measured by the ratio of carbovir triphosphate (active metabolite of ABC) to deoxyguanosine triphosphate (endogenous nucleotide), compared to ABC given alone.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary objectives of this study are to compare the virologic potency and pharmacology of TDF and ABC alone and in combination. Since it is not feasible or ethical to give mono or dual-therapy with these agents for prolonged intervals, this project was designed to take advantage of a short term drug exposure. The study performs intensive lab monitoring with a cross-over design to compare short courses of monotherapy and dual-therapy. This is an open-labeled study of a dual NRTI/NtRTI combination, ABC + TDF, compared to ABC and TDF monotherapy administered for 7 days. A screening genotype will be done to confirm that there are no resistance-associated mutations at baseline. Each subject will then be randomized to a 7-day sequence of monotherapy (ABC or TDF), and four measurements for plasma HIV RNA will be done to calculate the slope of the phase one viral decay. Prior to initiation of nucleoside analogues, PBMCs will be collected to measure baseline expression of nucleoside transport enzymes via RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. On days 7 and 8, serial blood specimens will be collected for plasma and intracellular levels of TDF and ABC. The monotherapy sequence will be followed by a 35-day washout period.

After the washout (day 42), subjects will initiate the dual NRTI/NtRTI therapy sequence for an additional 7 days. During dual NRTI/NtRTI therapy, again, four measurements for HIV RNA will be done to calculate the slope of the phase one viral decay. On day 48 and 49, serial plasma and intracellular levels of ABC + TDF will be evaluated. On Day 49 a second HIV genotype will be performed in real time. On day 49, after the second 7-day sequence, all subjects will receive EFV in addition to the ABC + TDF combination for 14 days. Afterwards, a second sample of PBMCs will be collected to evaluate for a potential induction or suppression of nucleoside transport enzymes. Since the long-term efficacy of the TDF + ABC nucleoside backbone is not yet known, TDF will be discontinued (day 63) and 3TC will be substituted. Subjects will then continue on the HAART portion of the study for an additional 46 weeks of EFV + ABC + 3TC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92668
        • UCI
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • USC
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • University of California San Diego
      • San Jose, California, United States, 95128
        • Santa Clara Valley Medical Center
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90502
        • Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. HIV-1 infection, as documented by any licensed ELISA test kit and confirmed by Western blot at any time prior to study entry. HIV-1 culture, HIV-1 antigen, plasma HIV-1 RNA, or a second antibody test by a method other than ELISA is acceptable as an alternative confirmatory test.
  2. Antiretroviral naïve defined as no prior therapy.
  3. CD4+ cell count > than 200 cells/ mm3 determined by site clinical laboratory within 90 days of screening.
  4. HIV-1 RNA level > 5000 copies/mL obtained by site clinical laboratory within 90 days of screening.
  5. Laboratory values obtained by screening laboratories within 30 days of entry:

    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 750/mm3.
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL.
    • Platelet count ≥ 50,000/mm3.
    • Calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) > 50 mL/min as estimated by the
    • AST (SGOT), ALT (SGPT), and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 x ULN.
    • Total bilirubin ≤ 2.5 x ULN.
  6. Negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 30 days of study entry.
  7. Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70.
  8. Men and women age ≥ 18 years.
  9. Ability and willingness of subject to give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any NRTI or NNRTI-associated resistance mutations as defined by the updated International AIDS Society-USA (IAS-USA) mutation list.
  2. Pregnancy and breast-feeding.
  3. Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
  4. Urgent need to initiate antiretroviral therapy, as determined by the patient's primary provider.
  5. Serious illness (requiring systemic treatment and/or hospitalization) until subject either completes therapy or is clinically stable on therapy, in the opinion of the investigator, for at least 14 days prior to study entry.
  6. Use of any immunomodulator, HIV vaccine, or investigational therapy within 30 days of study entry.
  7. Use of human growth hormone within 30 days prior to study entry.
  8. Initiation of testosterone or anabolic steroids within 30 days prior to study entry. (Exception: Chronic replacement dosages in patient's with diagnosed hypogonadism is allowed)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tenofovir
As part of this study visit, you participants will be assigned by chance to receive either TDF alone or ABC alone
300 mg once daily
Other Names:
  • (TDF)
Active Comparator: Abacavir
As part of this study visit, you participants will be assigned by chance to receive either TDF alone or ABC alone
600 mg once daily
Other Names:
  • (ABC, Ziagen)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Short-term Virologic Response
Time Frame: 49 days
Relative potencies of two monotherapy regimens (TDF alone vs. ABC alone) compared to the dual NRTI regimen of TDF+ABC as assessed by the short-term virologic response. (Change in HIV RNA copies/mL at baseline and day 7 for monotherapy, baseline and day 49 for dual therapy.)
49 days
Compare the Plasma Data of the Two Monotherapy Regimens to the Dual NRTI Regimen
Time Frame: 49 days

At day 49 of Sequence 2 a 24-hour post dose plasma sample should be collected and processed. All 7 samples from the sparse PK (time 0, 30-min, 1-hr, 2-hr, 3-hr, 6-hr and 24-hr post dose) should be sent overnight to appropriate off-site lab for analysis. Since the patient is on dual therapy and the each drug is measured in separate labs each PBMC samples should be split at each time-point with half of the samples shipped to Gilead and half shipped to USC (two separate shipments). ALL plasma samples should be sent to USC. Since samples have to be split we will need to collect double the blood for the intracellular (PBMC) PK:

Blood volume (PBMC-plasma): 40 mL - each draw Blood volume (plasma only): 3 mL - each draw Blood volume: 169 mL- over 2 days

Plasma NRTI and intracellular ddNTP concentrations were measured 7 days after treatment with ABC or TDF alone and were compared to levels obtained after 7 days of treatment with both drugs

49 days
Compare the Intracellular Pharmacokinetic (PK) Data of the Two Monotherapy Regimens to the Dual NRTI Regimen
Time Frame: 49 days

At day 49 of Sequence 2 a 24-hour post dose intracellular (PBMC) should be collected and processed. All 7 samples from the sparse PK (time 0, 30-min, 1-hr, 2-hr, 3-hr, 6-hr and 24-hr post dose) should be sent overnight to appropriate off-site lab for analysis. Since the patient is on dual therapy and the each drug is measured in separate labs each PBMC samples should be split at each time-point with half of the samples shipped to Gilead and half shipped to USC (two separate shipments). ALL intracellular (PBMC) samples should be sent to USC. Since samples have to be split we will need to collect double the blood for the intracellular (PBMC) PK:

Blood volume (PBMC-plasma): 40 mL - each draw Blood volume (plasma only): 3 mL - each draw Blood volume: 169 mL- over 2 days

Intracellular ddNTP concentrations were measured after 7 days on monotherapy and after 7 days on dual therapy

49 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate Change in Cellular Regulatory Enzymes Involved With Nucleoside Analogue Transport Across Cell Membranes as Assessed by RT-PCR of Specific mRNA Transcripts
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 63

At day 1 and day 63 a PBMC sample for RT-PCR of nucleoside analogue transport enzymes (enzymes for efflux, influx) will be collected. The day 1 specimen should be stored and sent with day 8 PK specimens to USC. Day 63 specimen should be sent to USC after collection and processing.

Blood volume: 20 mL Blood volume: 20 mL

Day 1 and Day 63
Determine Total Number of NRTI-associated Mutations After 7 Days of ABC or TDF Monotherapy or After 7 Days of Dual NRTI Therapy With ABC + TDF
Time Frame: 7 days
Subjects will be randomized to either TDF or ABC PO route for 7 days, which involves a fixed number of subjects. A sample size of 20 subjects (10 ABC and 10 TDF monotherapy and 20 ABC+TDF dual-therapy in HIV-positive patients). We determined the count of NRTI-associated mutations that emerged after 7 days of ABC or TDF monotherapy or after 7 days of dual NRTI therapy with ABC + TDF.
7 days
Compare the Relative Viral Potency of TDF Monotherapy Versus ABC Monotherapy
Time Frame: Baseline and day 7
Eligible patients will be randomized into two monotherapy arms (TDF and ABC) for a short (one week) viral dynamics and pharmacokinetics evaluation to determine their potency. After a one-month washout period, all patients will start a dual-therapy of ABC+TDF. Viral dynamics and pharmacokinetics of the dual-therapy will be evaluated during the first week of the treatment. EFV will be added to the regimen after one week of the dual-therapy administered. Relative potencies of two monotherapy regimens (TDF alone vs. ABC alone) assessed by the short-term virologic response. (Change in HIV RNA copies/mL at baseline and day 7 for monotherapy)
Baseline and day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Richard H Haubrich, MD, University California San Diego
  • Principal Investigator: Miguel A Goicoechea, MD, University California San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 7, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

April 27, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Tenofovir

Subscribe