Relative Potency of Inhaled Corticosteroids

July 19, 2011 updated by: St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Relative Potency of Inhaled Corticosteroids: Validation of a Clinical Model

To investigate the validity of a clinical model to determine the relative potency of different preparations of inhaled corticosteroids used for the treatment of asthma or of eosinophilic bronchitis without asthma.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

40

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6
        • Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Healthcare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sputum eosinophilia >3%
  • Adults age 18-70 years
  • History of episodic wheeze, chest tightness, dyspnea or cough within the last 12 months.
  • FEV1 ≥ 60% predicted
  • Steroid naive or on not more than 500 µg a day of beclomethasone or equivalent.
  • Able to give written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recent asthma or COPD exacerbation (as judged by the clinician) due to respiratory infection within the last month
  2. Relevant seasonal allergen exposure within 4 weeks or within the course of the study
  3. Treatment with prednisone or antibiotics or hospitalisation within the past 6 weeks
  4. Other respiratory diseases
  5. Women who are pregnant or unwilling to use appropriate contraception during the study
  6. Unable to withhold short-acting ß-agonist treatment for 6 hours before visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Sputum eosinophils

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Exhaled nitric oxide, FEV1, FEF25-75%

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederick E Hargreave, MD, McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2001

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

February 16, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2011

Last Verified

July 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on fluticasone 25, 50, 100, 200 mcg

3
Subscribe