Romiplostim (AMG 531) Versus Medical Standard of Care for Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura

November 4, 2022 updated by: Amgen

A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of AMG 531 Versus Medical Standard of Care as Chronic Therapy for Non-splenectomized Subjects With Immune (Idiopathic) Thrombocytopenic Purpura

This is a phase 3b, multi-center, randomized, Standard of Care (SOC)-controlled, open-label, 52-week treatment study to compare romiplostim to medical SOC for Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP), with a 6-month Safety Follow-up. Patients randomized to romiplostim must complete the taper or discontinuation of medical SOC for ITP as soon as medically feasible after the initiation of romiplostim. After the completion or discontinuation of the study treatment period, any participant who does not transfer in to another romiplostim study will complete a 6-month Safety Follow-up period.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

234

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is ≥ 18 years of age
  • Subject has a diagnosis of Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP) according to the American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines
  • If subject is > 60 years of age, subject has a written bone marrow biopsy report confirming the diagnosis of ITP
  • Subject has received at least 1 prior therapy for ITP
  • Subject has a platelet count < 50,000 or their platelet count falls to < 50,000 during or after a clinically-indicated taper or discontinuation of current ITP therapy
  • Before any study-specific procedure, the appropriate written informed consent must be obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has had a splenectomy for any reason
  • Subject has an active malignancy
  • Subject has a history of cancer, other than basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ, with treatment or active disease within 5 years
  • Subject has a known history of bone marrow stem cell disorder
  • Subject has participated in any study evaluating polyethylene glycol-conjugated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF), recombinant human thrombopoietin (rHuTPO), AMG 531, or a thrombopoietic protein
  • Subject is receiving other investigational agents or procedures
  • Subject is currently enrolled in, or has completed within the last 30 days, another investigational device or drug study
  • Subject is pregnant or breast feeding
  • Subject is not using adequate contraceptive precautions
  • Subject has known sensitivity to any recombinant E. coli-derived product
  • Subject has any kind of disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to give written informed consent and does not have a legally acceptable representative
  • Subject has any kind of disorder that compromises the ability of the subject to comply with study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Romiplostim
Romiplostim administered by subcutaneous injection once weekly at a starting dose of 3 μg/kg, adjusted to a maximum dose of 10 μg/kg to maintain a platelet count between 50 and 200 x 10^9/L for up to 52 weeks.
Other Names:
  • AMG 531
OTHER: Standard of Care
Medical standard of care treatments were selected and prescribed by the investigator according to standard institutional practices or therapeutic guidelines and administered for up to 52 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Splenectomy During 52-Week Treatment Period
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Occurrence of a splenectomy. Participants who discontinued study during the treatment period prior to reporting a splenectomy were considered as having had a splenectomy.
52 weeks
Number of Participants With Treatment Failure During 52-Week Treatment Period
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Treatment failure was defined by platelet counts ≤ 20 x 10^9/L for 4 consecutive weeks at the highest recommended dose and schedule, a major bleeding event, or change in therapy due to an intolerable side effect or bleeding symptom.
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Splenectomy
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Time to splenectomy in days calculated from date of randomization to date of splenectomy, or censored at date of end of treatment visit if no splenectomy was done during treatment period.
52 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Platelet Response
Time Frame: Weeks 1-8, and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Platelet response was defined as platelet counts > 50 x 10^9/L, measured at each study visit (excluding those within 8 weeks of prior rescue medication use) up to the time of splenectomy or the end of initial treatment period, whichever occurred first.
Weeks 1-8, and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of symptoms. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life.

Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.

Baseline and 52 weeks
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline and 52 weeks
Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of fatigue. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life. Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.
Baseline and 52 weeks
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Bother
Time Frame: Baseline and 52 weeks
Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of bother. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life. Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.
Baseline and 52 weeks
Change in ITP-PAQ Physical Health Domain of Activity
Time Frame: Baseline and 52 weeks

Change from Baseline in the Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patient Assessment Questionnaire (PAQ) physical health domain of activity. This domain has a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health-related quality of life.

Model included fixed effects of baseline assessment, geographic region, treatment group, assessment week, splenectomy status and treatment group-by-assessment week interaction. Treatment group and splenectomy status are time-varying covariates.

Baseline and 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 7, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 11, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2006

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 25, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thrombocytopenia

Clinical Trials on Romiplostim

3
Subscribe