- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00417235
Dressing: Frequency of Change and Evaluation of an Antiseptic-Impregnated Catheter Dressing in ICU Patients (DRESSING)
Dressing: Comparison of 3-day and 7-day Catheter Dressing Frequency and Efficacy of Antiseptic Impregnated Dressing in Preventing Catheter-related Infection in ICU
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Central venous catheters (CVCs) are often required for the care of patient admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and are now indispensable in modern-day medical practice. In the United States, it is estimated that 15 million CVC days occur each year in the ICU , and that approximately 80,000 CVC-associated bloodstream infection (BSIs) occur each year [2]. Data from the NNIS system indicate that approximately 40% of the BSIs are associated with a CVC in the ICU. This definition, however, include CVC-related BSIs (CRBSIs) and primary BSIs. In other multicenter surveys, primary BSIs are the leading cause of BSIs (30-35%), followed by CRBSIs (20-30%), and BSIs originating from pneumonia (20%) .
The attributable mortality of CRBSIs remains debated. It ranges from no increase in mortality in some studies, up to an attributable mortality of 35% in others. In studies adjusting for severity of illness, attributable mortality ranged between 0 and 11.5%. The excess ICU length of stay is estimated 9-12 days.
The cost of CRBSIs is therefore substantial, and efforts are required to reduce the incidence of theses infections. Several publications suggested that multiple strategies should be implemented concomitantly. Besides the critical importance of staff education, technology brings new materials that could decrease the risk for CRBSI. Several studies have demonstrated that antimicrobial- or antiseptic-impregnated CVCs can decrease CRBSIs in the ICU setting. Furthermore, cost-benefit analysis have suggested that the use of impregnated CVCs was beneficial
The recent CDC Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections recommend the use of antimicrobial- or antiseptic-impregnated CVCs in patients whose CVC is expected to remain in place for more than 5 days, and in ICUs where CRBSI rate remains above the benchmark rates, despite implementing a comprehensive strategy. This restricted recommended use is explained by the concern for emergence of resistance, the risk of adverse effects and the costs of these materials.
CRBSI rates in France could be lower than those observed in the United States. Data from two surveillance networks indicate that the rates of CRBSI range between 1 and 2 CRBSI per 1000 CVC days . Given these low rates, it is not clear that antimicrobial- or antiseptic-impregnated CVCs would be cost-effective.
Since most organisms responsible for CRBSI originate from insertion site in short-term CVC, there was a rationale to try to decrease bacterial colonization at cutaneous insertion site. Among the other new materials under development, a chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge (Biopatch TM), to be placed over the site of catheter insertion, has been proposed. In a prospective, controlled, bicenter, randomized, non blinded study, dressing changes every other day (control group) was compared to dressing changes every 7 days with Biopatch (Biopatch group) (Maki and al., ICAAC 2000). 1,401 lines (either CVCs, peripheral arterial catheters or pulmonary artery catheters) were included in 589 patients. Both groups of patients were comparable. Using proportional hazard models, both CVC colonization and CRBSI were significantly reduced in the Biopatch group, from 29% to 16% (HR, 0.62) for catheter colonization, and from 3.3% to 1.2% (HR, 0.38) for CRBSI.
This study demonstrated a significant reduction of CRBSI using Biopatch. Given the results presented at the ICAAC sessions, there is some concern, however, about the validity of the protective effect of the Biopatch.
Firstly, the intervention group associated Biopatch and the extension of the time between dressing changes, from 2 to 7 days. Preliminary data from cancer patients suggest that time between dressing changes could be extended. In a randomized study, Benhamou et al have recently compared a 4-day to a 15-day catheter-dressing change frequency in children undergoing chemotherapy. They have shown that skin cultures (27 vs 23%) and bloodstream infections (11 vs 13%) rates are not different between the 4-day and the 15-day groups. It is therefore unclear that the reduction of CRBSI observed in the Biopatch group was only due to the Biopatch.
Secondly, the control group in the Maki's study did not use a "placebo", i.e. a sponge not impregnated with chlorhexidine. The study was therefore not blinded for the ICU staff. It is strongly recommended to examine the catheter insertion site daily for local inflammatory signs. Biopatch impede to monitor the insertion site, with a potential for underestimation of local infections signs in these patients. It is possible that daily examination of the insertion site in the control group would conduct to remove the CVC more frequently in these patients, with a potential for higher rate of colonization. In addition, if a study is not blinded, it is useful for the validity of the results that a group of investigators, blinded to the randomized group, review the medical chart to classify catheter infection.
Thirdly, the rate if CRBSI was rather high in the control group (4.45 per 1000 line days). It is not certain that the benefit of Biopatch will be the same in ICUs with lower rates of CRBSI.
The aim of this study is therefore to evaluate the impact of Biopatch, and the impact of dressing changes (every 3 or 7 days) on the reduction of CVC infection
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Grenoble, France, 38043
- grenoble university hospital (medical ICU and surgical ICU)
-
Paris, France, 75014
- Saint Joseph Hospital
-
Paris, France, 75018
- University Hospital Beaujon
-
Paris, France, 75018
- University hospital Bichat Claude Bernard
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients older than 18 years
- with at least a central venous catheter or an arterial catheter
- whatever the first or subsequent CVC in a same patient
- in any site of insertion (sub-clavian, jugular or femoral)
- whatever le CVC is tunnelled or not
- CVC inserted in the study ICU or immediately before by the intensisvist in the emergency unit or in the operative room,
- CVC inserted under maximal barrier precautions
Exclusion Criteria:
- pulmonary artery catheter, haemodialysis/haemodiafiltration CVCs
- known allergy to chlorhexidine
- CVC not inserted under maximal barrier precautions
- Expected duration of CVC for less than 48 hours
- CVC inserted under emergency conditions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 3-days dressing frequency/CHX sponge
Interventions: Device: 'Chlorhexidine Sponge (Biopatch TM)' on the insertion site |
dressing with chlorexidrine sponge versus dressing without chlorexidrine sponge
|
Experimental: 7-days dressing frequency/CHX sponge
Interventions: Behavioural: 7-day catheter dressing frequency Device: 'Chlorhexidine Sponge (Biopatch TM)' on the insertion site |
dressing with chlorexidrine sponge versus dressing without chlorexidrine sponge
dressing changes every 7 days versus every classical change every 3 days
|
No Intervention: 3-days dressing frequency/No CHX sponge
No intervention, classical protocol of dressing frequency every 3-days and no other device
|
|
Experimental: 7-days dressing change/No CHX sponge
Interventions:Behavioural: 7-day catheter dressing frequency
|
dressing changes every 7 days versus every classical change every 3 days
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Systemic catheter related sepsis as defined by a blinded expert panels to unmask differences between Chlorhexidine dressings and no Chlorhexidine dressings
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
48 hours
|
Significant catheter culture >=103 cfu/ml for non inferiority between 7 days and 3 day catheter-dressing frequencies
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
48 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
catheter related septicemia
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
48 hours
|
cutaneous allergy
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
24 hours
|
cost
Time Frame: within the 60 days after catheter insertion
|
within the 60 days after catheter insertion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: jean-francois Timsit, University Hospital, Grenoble
- Study Chair: jean-christophe Lucet, MD, University hospital Bichat, Paris, France
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Buetti N, Ruckly S, Schwebel C, Mimoz O, Souweine B, Lucet JC, Timsit JF. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge versus chlorhexidine gel dressing for short-term intravascular catheters: which one is better? Crit Care. 2020 Jul 23;24(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03174-0.
- Timsit JF, Bouadma L, Mimoz O, Parienti JJ, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Alfandari S, Plantefeve G, Bronchard R, Troche G, Gauzit R, Antona M, Canet E, Bohe J, Herrault MC, Schwebel C, Ruckly S, Souweine B, Lucet JC. Jugular versus femoral short-term catheterization and risk of infection in intensive care unit patients. Causal analysis of two randomized trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov 15;188(10):1232-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0460OC.
- Timsit JF, Bouadma L, Ruckly S, Schwebel C, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Bronchard R, Calvino-Gunther S, Laupland K, Adrie C, Thuong M, Herault MC, Pease S, Arrault X, Lucet JC. Dressing disruption is a major risk factor for catheter-related infections. Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1707-14. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e0d46.
- Schwebel C, Lucet JC, Vesin A, Arrault X, Calvino-Gunther S, Bouadma L, Timsit JF. Economic evaluation of chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults in the Dressing Study. Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):11-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f0604.
- Timsit JF, Schwebel C, Bouadma L, Geffroy A, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Pease S, Herault MC, Haouache H, Calvino-Gunther S, Gestin B, Armand-Lefevre L, Leflon V, Chaplain C, Benali A, Francais A, Adrie C, Zahar JR, Thuong M, Arrault X, Croize J, Lucet JC; Dressing Study Group. Chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges and less frequent dressing changes for prevention of catheter-related infections in critically ill adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Mar 25;301(12):1231-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.376.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 05PHN01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome
-
University of CologneCompletedSystemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)Germany
-
Arkansas Children's Hospital Research InstituteEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...TerminatedSIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome(United States
-
Medical University of GdanskCompletedInflammatory Response Syndrome, Systemic | Granulocyte Immature FormsPoland
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalCompletedSepsis | SIRS(Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome)China
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalUnknownSepsis | SIRS(Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome)China
-
ImmunexpressJohns Hopkins University; Northwell Health; Rush University Medical Center; Intermountain... and other collaboratorsCompletedSepsis | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)United States
-
Seattle Children's HospitalImmunexpressCompletedSepsis | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)United States
-
University of ArkansasTerminatedPediatric Patients With SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome)United States
-
University Hospital, LimogesTerminatedSevere Sepsis | Inflammatory Response Syndrome, SystemicFrance
-
Seattle Children's HospitalImmunexpressCompletedSepsis | Non-Infectious Systemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeUnited States
Clinical Trials on Chlorhexidine Sponge (Biopatch TM)
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonCompletedCatheter Infections | Spinal Catheter (Epidural) (Subdural); Complications, Infection or InflammationUnited States
-
Singapore General HospitalJohnson & JohnsonCompletedPeritoneal Dialysis Catheter Exit Site InfectionSingapore
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedCatheter Related Bloodstream InfectionUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedCatheter-related Bloodstream InfectionUnited States
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenRecruitingEosinophilic EsophagitisCanada
-
3MUniversity of NebraskaCompletedCatheterization
-
Mayo ClinicUniversity of California, San Francisco; Ethicon, Inc.CompletedBreast Cancer | Nonmalignant Breast ConditionsUnited States
-
University of BirminghamUniversity College, London; National Institute for Health Research, United...RecruitingSurgery | Surgery--Complications | Surgical Wound Infection | Surgical Site InfectionUnited Kingdom
-
Universidad de GuanajuatoAntisepsia CentralCompleted