Evaluation of Triathlon - a New Total Knee Prosthesis System - Triathlon vs. Duracon

February 20, 2024 updated by: Stryker Orthopaedics

Evaluation of Triathlon - a New Total Knee Prosthesis System. Prospective, Comparative, Randomised, Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) Series

The objective is to investigate the Clinical, Radiographic, Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric behaviour and patient outcome when using the Triathlon total knee prosthesis in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The evaluation is carried out by a prospective randomised RSA-study with Triathlon cemented knee prosthesis versus Duracon cemented knee prosthesis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hässleholm, Sweden
        • Hässleholm Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients suffering exclusively from osteo arthritis (OA), Stage II-V [Ahlbäck, 1968] will be operated.
  2. Patients requiring knee prosthesis, suitable for the use of Duracon and Triathlon knee system
  3. Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing and able to comply with the post-operative scheduled clinical and radiographical evaluations and the prescribed rehabilitation.
  4. Patients who signed the Ethics Committee approved Informed Consent Form prior to surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous major knee surgery
  2. Other significant disabling problems from the muscular-skeletal system than in the knees
  3. Obese patients where obesity is severe enough to affect subject's ability to perform activities of daily living (body mass index, kg/m2: BMI above 35).
  4. Patients with active or suspected infection.
  5. Patients with malignancy - active malignancy.
  6. Patients with severe osteoporosis, Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy.
  7. Patients immunologically suppressed, or receiving steroids in excess of physiologic dose requirements.
  8. The patient has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficit which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device or the patient has a neurological deficit which interferes with the patient's ability to limit weight bearing or places an extreme load on the implant during the healing period.
  9. Female patients planning a pregnancy during the course of the study.
  10. Patients with systemic or metabolic disorders leading to progressive bone deterioration.
  11. Patients, who as judged by the surgeon, are mentally incompetent or are unlikely to be compliant with the prescribed post-operative routine and follow-up evaluation schedule.
  12. Patients with other severe concurrent joint involvements, which can affect their outcome.
  13. Patients with other concurrent illnesses, which are likely to affect their outcome such as sickle cell anaemia, systemic lupus erythematosus or renal disease requiring dialysis.
  14. Patients under the protection of law (e.g. guardianship).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cemented Triathlon total knee system
The Triathlon total knee system is the successor of the Duracon total knee system and was observed in a prospective randomised, parallel, double-blind study.
Orthopaedic implant
Active Comparator: Cemented Duracon total knee system
The Duracon total knee system is the predecessor of the Triathlon total knee system and was observed in a prospective randomised, parallel, double-blind study.
Orthopaedic implant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: 2 years
To compare the maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the Triathlon and Duracon tibial components at two years assessed by means of RSA.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: 3 months, 1, 5, 7 and 10 years
To compare the maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the Triathlon and Duracon tibial components by means of RSA.
3 months, 1, 5, 7 and 10 years
Investigation of Clinical Performance and Patient Outcome With KSS (Knee Society Score)
Time Frame: [Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years]
The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, ROM and joint stability, and one for functional parameters. Sub-scores range from a potential minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100 points. Although the specific scores are not distinguished as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor," a higher value represents a better outcome.
[Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years]
Investigation of Clinical Performance and Patient Outcome With KOOS Patient Questionnaire
Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years

KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). The previous week is the time period considered when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

[taken from User Guide] http://www.koos.nu/

pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
Investigation of Clinical Performance and Patient Outcome With EQ-5D Patient Questionnaire
Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years

The EQ-5D is a subject-completed questionnaire designed to assess subject health state values. The EQ-5D consists of 2 areas; the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) and EQ-5D descriptive system. The EQ VAS collects health state values using a 20 cm visual analogue scale with the endpoints labeled best imaginable health state at the top and worst imaginable health state at the bottom, having numeric values of 100 to 0 respectively. The EQ-5D Time Trade-off (TTO) descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/comfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has three levels: no problems, some problems and extreme problems, where an overall score of 1 represents full health.

NOTE: While the protocol includes pre-operative, 3 months, and 1 year, this data was not collected.

pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
Mean Operative Time
Time Frame: intra-operative
Skin to skin operative time
intra-operative
Duration Hospital Stay
Time Frame: preoperative to discharge
preoperative to discharge
Blood Loss
Time Frame: intra-operative
Blood loss during surgery
intra-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sören Toksvig-Larsen, ass. prof, Department of ortopaedics, Hässleholm Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

February 19, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • K-S-015 Triathlon RSA_1
  • K-S-015_1 (Other Identifier: StrykerEuropean)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Clinical Trials on Cemented Triathlon total knee system

Subscribe