Ultrasound Imaging, Spectroscopy and Ultrasound Imaging of Vascular Blood Flow as Early Indicators of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment.

December 5, 2023 updated by: Dr. Gregory Czarnota, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Pilot Investigation of Ultrasound Imaging and Spectroscopy and Ultrasound Imaging of Vascular Blood Flow as Early Indicators of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment

We have previously demonstrated that high-frequency ultrasound and spectroscopy, and recently conventional-frequency ultrasound and spectroscopy may be used to detect cell death in vitro, in situ and in vivo. The method can detect different forms of cell death and has been demonstrated to be sensitive to apoptotic, necrotic and mitotic cell death. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the use of ultrasound imaging and spectroscopy as a predictive marker of advanced tumour response to combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Since neoadjuvant treatments may also act on tumour vasculature to "normalize" it we will also evaluate blood-vessel imaging by standard Doppler-imaging and with standard higher-resolution imaging using clinically approved microbubble contrast agents.

The main goal, as described above, is to select the best ultrasound spectroscopy parameter to use as an early predictor of pathological complete response.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

We have previously demonstrated that high-frequency ultrasound and spectroscopy, and recently conventional-frequency ultrasound and spectroscopy may be used to detect cell death in vitro, in situ and in vivo. The method can detect different forms of cell death and has been demonstrated to be sensitive to apoptotic, necrotic and mitotic cell death. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the use of ultrasound imaging and spectroscopy as a predictive marker of advanced tumour response to combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Since neoadjuvant treatments may also act on tumour vasculature to "normalize" it we will also evaluate blood-vessel imaging by standard Doppler-imaging and with standard higher-resolution imaging using clinically approved microbubble contrast agents.

The main goal, as described above, is to select the best ultrasound spectroscopy parameter to use as an early predictor of pathological complete response.

Specifically, we will as a primary endpoint correlate changes in ultrasound backscatter parameters obtained throughout the course of treatment with pathological complete, partial, or complete and partial response. We ultimately hope to be able to generate a Receiver-Operator-Curve for each parameter beyond this pilot investigation. The ultrasound-spectroscopy parameters to be examined include mid-band fit, spectral-slope and histogram-distribution-fit parameters related to scatterer size and concentration. From these various receiver-operator curves the best ultrasound parameter for predicting response will be selected and will aid to define the clinical specificity and sensitivity of the technique.

The secondary endpoint in this study will include examining the change in size of the tumour, which will also be measured using conventional gold-standard B-scan ultrasound imaging (length by width by height in addition to volume) and correlating that to the spectroscopic ultrasound changes determined at different times during patient treatment.

Other secondary endpoints will include measuring changes in blood vessel distribution by standard Doppler-imaging and standard microbubble contrast agent imaging. As another secondary endpoint we will also correlate our ultrasound changes with 2 and 5-year long-term clinical outcome.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Recruiting
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women who are receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

The following criteria are necessary for study participation:

  1. Histologically or cytologically confirmed breast carcinoma, stage I-IV, which has not been treated with any first-line therapy and will be treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant combined chemo-radiotherapy.
  2. Measurable disease by ultrasound, or MRI performed within 28 days prior to treatment.
  3. Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1.
  4. Life expectancy of at least 6 months.
  5. Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function as assessed by the following laboratory. Requirements to be conducted within 7 days prior to dosing:

    (i) hemoglobin >90 mg/dL (ii) leukocytes >3,000/mL (iii) absolute neutrophil count >1,500/mL (iv) platelets >100,000/mL (v) total bilirubin within normal institutional limits (vi) AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) <2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal (vii) creatinine within normal institutional limits or creatinine clearance >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for patients with creatinine levels above institutional upper limit of normal

  6. Patients should have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to any study specific procedures.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

The following conditions will exclude women from participation:

  1. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or major surgery within 4 weeks prior to registering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks prior to registration.
  2. Receiving any other investigational agents.
  3. Known brain metastases.
  4. History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary Outcome will be correlate changes in ultrasound backscatter parameters obtained throughout the course of treatment with pathological complete, partial, or complete and partial response.
Time Frame: 2 and 5-year long-term clinical outcome
Ultrasound spectroscopy parameters to be examined include mid-band fit parameters, spectral slope and histogram distribution fit parameters related to scatterer size and concentration. From these various receiver-operator curves, the best ultrasound parameter predictive response will be selected and will aid to define the clinical specificity and sensitivity of The technique.
2 and 5-year long-term clinical outcome

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The secondary Outcome of this study will include examining the change in tumor size.
Time Frame: 2 and 5-year long-term clinical outcome
The change in tumor size, which It will also be measured using conventional gold standard B-scan ultrasound images (length by width by height in addition to volume) and correlating it with spectroscopic ultrasound changes determined at different times during the patient's treatment.
2 and 5-year long-term clinical outcome
Other secondary Outcome will include measuring changes in the blood vessels distribution in the tumor.
Time Frame: 2 and 5-year long-term clinical outcome
Measurement of changes in the distribution of blood vessels according to the standard doppler-imaging and standard microbubbles contrast agent imaging.
2 and 5-year long-term clinical outcome

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gregory J. Czarnota, Ph.D. M.D., Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 17, 2008

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2007

First Posted (Estimated)

February 21, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 185-2006

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Invasive

Subscribe