Safety and Efficacy of MTS Versus Concerta in Pediatric Patients (Aged 6-12 Years) With ADHD

June 23, 2015 updated by: Noven Therapeutics

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Center, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Dose Optimization Study, Designed to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Methylphenidate Transdermal System (MTS) vs. CONCERTA® in Pediatric Patients Aged 6-12 With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MTS compared to placebo with reference to CONCERTA® in pediatric subjects diagnosed with ADHD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, dose optimization study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MTS (12.5, 18.75, 25, and 37.5 cm2) compared to placebo with reference to CONCERTA® in pediatric subjects diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

282

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male or female aged 6-12 years
  • females of Child-bearing Potential (FOCP) must have a negative serum beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) pregnancy test at Screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline.
  • a primary diagnosis of ADHD based on a detailed psychiatric evaluation
  • a total score of =>26 on the ADHD-RS-IV at the Baseline Visit
  • a minimum level of intellectual functioning, as determined by an IQ (based on KBIT) score of 80 or above
  • no comorbid illness that could affect safety or tolerability or in any way interfere with the subject's participation in the study.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • a current, controlled (requiring a restricted medication) or uncontrolled, comorbid psychiatric diagnosis (except ODD) with significant symptoms such as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), psychosis, bipolar illness, pervasive developmental disorder, severe obsessive compulsive disorder, severe depressive or severe anxiety disorder
  • a known non-responder to psychostimulant treatment
  • overweight (Body Mass Index (BMI)-for-age >90th percentile)
  • a history of seizures during the last 2 years (exclusive of infantile febrile seizures), a tic disorder, a current diagnosis and/or family history of Tourette's Disorder.
  • Conduct Disorder.
  • Subject has taken an investigational drug within 30 days prior to Screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Methylphenidate Transdermal System
Methylphenidate 2.7mg, 41.3mg, 55mg, and 82.5mg patches for 7 weeks
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate, under controlled conditions, the safety and efficacy of MTS compared to placebo with reference to CONCERTA
Other Names:
  • MTS
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebp matching MTS and Concerta for 7 weeks
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate, under controlled conditions, the safety and efficacy of MTS compared to placebo with reference to CONCERTA
Other Names:
  • Sham treatment
Active Comparator: Concerta
Methylphenidate HCL 18mg tablet 7 weeks
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate, under controlled conditions, the safety and efficacy of MTS compared to placebo with reference to CONCERTA
Other Names:
  • Methylphenidate HCL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate, under controlled conditions, the safety and efficacy of SPD485 (MTS) compared to placebo with reference to CONCERTA®, as determined by the change in the clinician completed ADHD-RS-IV at each visit.
Time Frame: 7 weeks
7 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
CTRS-R, CPRS-R, CGI, PGA scores
Time Frame: 7 weeks
7 weeks
Treatment emergent AEs, dermal evaluations, PK
Time Frame: 7 weeks
7 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Clinical Trials on Methylphenidate Transdermal System

Subscribe