- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00460655
Study of GSK1358820 In Patients With Post-Stroke Lower Limb Spasticity
August 30, 2010 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Post-Stroke Lower Limb Spasticity Receiving a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled GSK1358820 Treatment Followed by an Open-Label GSK1358820 Treatment
This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with equinus deformity associated with post-stroke lower limb spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with equinus deformity associated with post-stroke lower limb spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
120
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Fukuoka, Japan, 811-0213
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Hiroshima, Japan, 720-0825
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Hiroshima, Japan, 728-0001
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Hokkaido, Japan, 005-0802
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Hokkaido, Japan, 005-8555
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Hokkaido, Japan, 006-0805
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Hokkaido, Japan, 053-0803
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Ibaraki, Japan, 302-0112
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Kanagawa, Japan, 247-8533
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Kanagawa, Japan, 227-8518
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Kanagawa, Japan, 253-8558
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Kanagawa, Japan, 257-0001
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Kumamoto, Japan, 860-8518
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Shizuoka, Japan, 410-1128
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Shizuoka, Japan, 410-2507
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Shizuoka, Japan, 410-3293
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Tokyo, Japan, 142-8666
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Tokyo, Japan, 105-8471
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Tokyo, Japan, 140-0001
- GSK Investigational Site
-
Yamaguchi, Japan, 740-0021
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects eligible for enrollment in the study must meet all of the following criteria:
- Patients with lower limb spasticity who are at least 6 months post-stroke and present with equinus deformity (plantar flexion of the ankle) at the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2).
- Patients with MAS ankle score of ≥3 at the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2).
- Male or female between 20 and 80 years of age at the time of informed consent. For males, only those who can practice contraception during the study period are eligible.
- ≥50kg in weight at the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2).
- Inpatient or outpatient; however, the hospitalization status must remain unchanged during the double-blind phase. NOTE: Subjects may be hospitalized for ≤10 days after injection during the treatment period.
- Written informed consent from the subject him/herself. If the subject's signature is not legible, the attendance of a witness is required.
Exclusion Criteria:
- A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if any of the following criteria apply:
- Bilateral hemiplegia or quadriplegia.
- Presence of fixed contractures of the ankle (absence of range of motion).
- Profound atrophy of the muscles to be injected.
- Previous surgical intervention, phenol block, ethanol block, or Muscle Afferent Block (MAB) for ankle spasticity.
- Casting of the study lower limb within 3 months prior to the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2).
- Current treatment with intrathecal baclofen.
- Use of peripheral muscle relaxants (dantrolene sodium, suxamethonium chloride, pancuronium bromide, vecuronium bromide, rocuronium bromide).
- Concurrent use of antibiotics that interfere with neuromuscular transmission, such as aminoglycoside antibiotics (e.g., streptomycin sulfate, kanamycin sulfate, gentamicin sulfate, neomycin sulphate, spectinomycin hydrochloride), polypeptide antibiotics (e.g., polymixin B sulfate), lincomycin antibiotics (e.g., lincomycin hydrochloride, clindamycin), and enviomycin sulfate.
- Previous or current botulinum toxin therapy of any serotype.
- Diagnosis of systemic neuromuscular disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis).
- Females who are pregnant, nursing, may be pregnant, or planning a pregnancy during the study period.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any ingredient of study medication (e.g., human serum albumin).
- Presence of psychiatric disorder or impairment of intellectual function that may interfere with the subject's ability to give informed consent or the conduct of the study.
- Bedridden patients.
- Presence of clinically unstable severe cardiovascular disease.
- Presence of clinically significant severe renal or hepatic disease.
- Infection or dermatological condition at the proposed injection sites.
- Previous or planned participation in another clinical study (including the upper limb spasticity study of GSK1358820) within 6 months prior to the start of double-blind phase (Visit 2).
- Others whom the investigator or sub investigator considers not eligible for the study.
- Clinically significant severe reduction of muscle strength.
- Angle closure glaucoma or its preposition (narrow angle).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
|
Placebo
|
|
Active Comparator: BTX
|
botulinum toxin type A
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Ankle Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
|
Change from baseline in MAS ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated.
In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS ankle score change curve and the horizontal axis was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS ankle score.
Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the AUC has a negative sign.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the MAS Ankle Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters.
Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point in double-blind phase.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point in the double-blind phase.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase.
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase
|
Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Ankle Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The investigator assessed Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ankle score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Physician's Rating Score (PRS) at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The investigator assessed the PRS of gait pattern consisting of 3 parameters.
Affected limb was scored on a scale of -1 (worst) to 9 (best) based on 3 parameters (initial foot contact, foot contact at midstance, gait assistive devices) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Time (Seconds) to Walk 10 Meters at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The time (seconds) required to walk 10 meters was measured at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
|
Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase
Time Frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
The CGI of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48.
|
Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2007
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2008
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2007
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 13, 2007
First Posted (Estimate)
April 16, 2007
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
September 8, 2010
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 30, 2010
Last Verified
August 1, 2010
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BTX108512
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebrovascular Accident
-
China Medical University HospitalRecruitingCerebrovascular Accident (CVA)Taiwan
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Heart and Stroke Foundation...CompletedStroke | Vascular Accident, Brain | Stroke, Acute | Cerebrovascular Accident | Cerebral Stroke | Cerebrovascular Stroke | Cerebrovascular Accident, Acute | Apoplexy | CVA | Cerebrovascular ApoplexyCanada
-
Sheba Medical CenterCompletedLate Effects of Cerebrovascular Accident
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompletedTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation | Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)Belgium
-
Sunnyview Rehabilitation HospitalCompletedStroke | Stroke, Acute | Cerebrovascular Accident | Cerebrovascular Accident, AcuteUnited States
-
Peking University Third HospitalAstraZeneca Investment (China) Co., LtdCompletedCerebrovascular Accident | Cerebrovascular Accident, AcuteChina
-
Medical University of South CarolinaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiCompletedIschemic Cerebrovascular AccidentUnited States
-
John DavidsonWashington University School of MedicineWithdrawnIschemic Cerebrovascular AccidentUnited States
-
University of California, IrvineEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingStroke, Ischemic | Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)United States
-
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknownHypertension | DyslipidemiasKorea, Republic of