- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00497874
An Expert System to Reduce Depression in Primary Care
February 12, 2021 updated by: Pro-Change Behavior Systems
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a home-based intervention matched to stage of change (readiness) for using effective methods to prevent or reduce depression can improve depression outcomes in primary care.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A variety of effective interventions exist for people who are willing to seek help for depression.
However, there is a lack of interventions for individuals who are not willing to seek help or follow through with treatment recommendations.
This is the first population-based intervention for depression that is appropriate for individuals in all stages of change-not merely the minority who are prepared to take action.
Two primary care samples were included: 1) patients at risk for or experiencing depression but not involved in or planning treatment (Untreated Sample), and 2) patients newly prescribed antidepressant medication (Antidepressant Sample).
Patients from both samples were randomly assigned to receive the intervention consisting of telephone assessments, a stage-based workbook, and three individualized, computer-generated reports mailed to the home (n=443), or usual care (n=459).
Primary outcomes, assessed at 9 months, were change in depression severity, reliable and clinically significant change in depression severity, stage of change for using effective methods or prevent or reduce depression, onset of major depression if experiencing only subclinical symptoms at baseline, and medication adherence.
The study design included an examination of whether the intervention effect was moderated by primary care sample, baseline use of effective methods to prevent or reduce depression, and level of depression.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
902
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- John H. Stroger Hospital
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Newton, Massachusetts, United States, 02466
- Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At risk for or experiencing depression (i.e., Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI) score of 10 or higher; current major depression, minor depression, or dysthymia; or past major depression, minor depression, or dysthymia)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Younger than age 18
- Involved in counseling or planning counseling in the next 30 days
- Taking antidepressant medication or planning to take antidepressants in the next 30 days (exclusion criterion for Untreated Sample only)
- Suicidal ideation
- Severe depression (BDI > 28) and deemed inappropriate for study by site clinician
- BDI <10 and in the Maintenance stage for using effective methods to prevent or reduce depression
- History of bipolar disorder
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Computer-tailored intervention
Stage-based manual and three computer-tailored reports
|
Stage-based manual and three computer-tailored reports
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Usual care
Usual primary care treatment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Depression Severity
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 months
|
Depression was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd Edition (BDI-II)(Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996).
In this self-report measure, 21 symptoms of depression are rated on a 0-3 scale.
Scores for the 21 items are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 63.
The change scores reported here are the difference between the total BDI-II scores at baseline and 9 months (i.e., 9 months minus baseline).
Change scores range from -63 to +63, with larger negative scores indicating greater reduction in depression.
|
Baseline, 9 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants Exhibiting a Reliable and Clinically Significant Change in Depression Severity
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Two statistical criteria (Jacobson & Truax, 1991a; Atkins, Bedics, McGlinchey, & Beauchaine, 2005) were used to define reliable and clinically significant improvement.
The first involved selecting a cutoff that represents remission or the absence of symptoms, which was selected to be BDI-II < 9.
The second involved selecting a pre-post difference score that represents a statistically reliable change (e.g., how much change-1 point, 5 points, 10 points-is needed to be 95% confident that a real change has occurred, rather than just a chance fluctuation due to the unreliability of the measure?)
Using a general formula for calculating reliable change that incorporates test-retest reliability (Jacobson & Truax, 1991b), reliable change for the BDI-II was calculated to be 5.13, and rounded down to 5. Thus, reliable and clinically significant improvement on the BDI-II was defined as a reduction of 5 or more points from baseline to follow-up and a follow-up score < 9.
|
9 months
|
Number of Participants in the Action or Maintenance Stage for Using Effective Methods to Prevent Depression.
Time Frame: 9 months
|
Depression prevention was defined as: "Using effective methods to keep depression from occurring, or if it does occur, to keep it as mild and brief as possible."
Effective methods were: 1) controlling negative thinking; 2) engaging in healthy, pleasant activities; 3) practicing stress management; 4) exercising; and 5) getting professional help when needed.
Patients who reported that they were not currently practicing depression prevention and had no intention of doing so in the next 6 months were classified in the precontemplation stage; those who intended to practice depression prevention in the next 6 months or next 30 days were classified in the contemplation or preparation stage, respectively; those who had been practicing depression prevention for less than 6 months were in the action stage, and those who had been practicing for more than 6 months were in maintenance.
This outcome represents the number of participants in the action or maintenance stage at 9 months follow-up.
|
9 months
|
Number Participants Without Major Depression at Baseline Who Experienced the Onset of Major Depression During Follow-up
Time Frame: 9 months
|
At baseline and follow-up, Major Depression was assessed using 9-item depression module of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Patient Health Questionnaire-PHQ-9 (Spitzer, Kroenke, & Williams, 1999).
In this analysis, Major Depression was assessed among participants not meeting criteria for major depression at baseline.
|
9 months
|
Number of Participants Taking Prescribed Antidepressant Medication (Medication Adherence)
Time Frame: 9 months
|
At 9 months follow-up, participants who had been prescribed antidepressant medication were asked if they had started and were still taking it.
Participants who were taking their medication or had stopped with their doctor's advice were considered to be adherent.
|
9 months
|
Change in Physical Functioning
Time Frame: Baseline, 9 months
|
Physical functioning was assessed using the Physical Functioning, Role Functioning, Health Perceptions, and Pain subscales of the 20-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form survey (SF-20) (Stewart, Hays, & Ware, Jr., 1988).
(SF-20 subscales assessing mental health and social functioning were omitted to get a purer measure of physical functioning).
Physical functioning was computed by taking the mean of the four subscales after each was linearly transformed to range from 0-100.
The change scores reported here are the difference between the physical functioning scores at baseline and 9 months (i.e., 9 months minus baseline).
Change scores range from -100 to +100, with higher positive scores indicating more improvement in physical functioning.
|
Baseline, 9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Deborah A. Levesque, Ph.D., Pro-Change Behavior Systems, Inc.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2003
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2006
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2006
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2007
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 5, 2007
First Posted (Estimate)
July 9, 2007
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 17, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 12, 2021
Last Verified
February 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R44MH060522 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Depression
-
ProgenaBiomeRecruitingDepression | Depression, Postpartum | Depression, Anxiety | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Clinical Depression | Depression in Remission | Depression, Endogenous | Depression ChronicUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedTreatment Resistant Depression | Late Life Depression | Geriatric Depression | Refractory Depression | Therapy-Resistant DepressionUnited States, Canada
-
Kintsugi Mindful Wellness, Inc.Sonar Strategies; Vituity PsychiatryRecruitingDepression | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Depression MildUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoRecruitingDepression Moderate | Depression Mild | Depression, TeenUnited States
-
University GhentUniversiteit Antwerpen; Janssen-Cilag Ltd.RecruitingDepression Moderate | Depression Severe | Depression MildBelgium
-
Baylor College of MedicineUniversity of TexasRecruitingDepression | Depression Moderate | Depression Severe | Suicide and Self-harm | Depression in Adolescence | Depression MildUnited States
-
University of Cape TownNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedPostpartum Depression | Clinical Depression | Moderate DepressionSouth Africa
-
Washington University School of MedicinePatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; National Institute of Mental...CompletedMajor Depressive Disorder | Treatment Resistant Depression | Treatment-Refractory Depression | Late Life Depression | Geriatric DepressionUnited States, Canada
-
Northern Illinois UniversityUniversity Autonoma de Santo DomingoTerminatedDepression Moderate | Depression MildUnited States, Dominican Republic
-
Gerbera Therapeutics, Inc.Not yet recruitingPostpartum Depression | Depression, Postpartum | Postnatal Depression | Post-partum Depression | Post-Natal DepressionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Computer-tailored intervention
-
University of Rhode IslandCompletedPrevention Harmful EffectsUnited States
-
VA Connecticut Healthcare SystemUnknown
-
University of California, DavisUniversity of Rochester; City University of New York, School of Public HealthCompletedColorectal NeoplasmsUnited States
-
University of Massachusetts, WorcesterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); University of Massachusetts, AmherstCompletedTobacco SmokingUnited States
-
Indiana UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedColorectal CancerUnited States
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedHypertension | Diabetes Mellitus | Diabetes
-
University of SevilleMaastricht University; Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional sobre...CompletedAlcohol Drinking | Binge Drinking | Adolescent BehaviorSpain
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Massachusetts General Hospital; Fox Chase Cancer... and other collaboratorsCompletedCancer | Colorectal | Intervention | ScreeningUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)CompletedInactivityUnited States
-
Oslo University HospitalThe Research Council of NorwayCompletedLymphoma | Leukemia | Cancer | Stem Cell Transplantation