Cytarabine in Combination With Arsenic Trioxide vs. Cytarabine Alone in Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

July 24, 2012 updated by: Cephalon

An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Low-Dose Cytarabine in Combination With Arsenic Trioxide Compared With Low-Dose Cytarabine Alone for the Treatment of Elderly Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether low-dose cytarabine in combination with arsenic trioxide is more effective than low-dose cytarabine alone in achieving complete remission in elderly patients (≥60 years of age) with acute myeloid leukemia.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

67

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G2M9
        • Princess Margaret Hospital
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Medical Center
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • USC / Norris Cancer Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • University of Illinois
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana Oncology Hematology Consultants
    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14263
        • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Weill Medical College of Cornell University
      • New York, New York, United States, 10011
        • St. Vincent's Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • North Carolina
      • Greenville, North Carolina, United States, 27834
        • Brody School of Medicine
    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • University of Oklahoma
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • UT Health Science Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has confirmed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
  • The patient is unwilling or unable to tolerate conventional induction chemotherapy.
  • The patient has no comorbid conditions that would limit life expectancy to less than 3 months.
  • Patient must meet specific laboratory parameters for study inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

- The patient has had previous cytotoxic chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Previous treatment with low-dose cytarabine is not permitted.

  • The patient has a QT interval outside of the protocol-specified range.
  • The patient has laboratory values outside of protocol-specified ranges.
  • The patient is concurrently treated with cytotoxic therapy, radiation, or investigational agents.
  • The patient has uncontrolled, severe cardiovascular or pulmonary disease or other uncontrolled medical condition.
  • The patient has known central nervous system involvement with AML.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Low-dose cytarabine plus arsenic trioxide
Cycle 1 cytarabine 10 mg/m^2 was administered subcutaneously (sc) twice daily (bid) on days 1-14. 0.25 mg/kg arsenic trioxide was administered intravenously (iv) on days 1-5 and days 8-12. Cycle 2 A second identical cycle of cytarabine and arsenic trioxide was given to patients with persistent disease. Patients who achieved complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete platelet count recovery (CRp), or partial remission (PR) after 1 or 2 cycles received a 14-day consolidation cycle of cytarabine and arsenic trioxide with the doses and schedule identical to the initial cycle. A recovery period of up to 4 weeks between the attainment of CR, CRp, or PR and the initiation of consolidation treatment was allowed. Patients who completed consolidation treatment started maintenance treatment of arsenic trioxide 0.25 mg/kg iv on days 1 and 4 and cytarabine 10 mg/m^2 sc bid on days 1 through 7 of a 28-day cycle.
Arsenic trioxide will be administered intravenously (iv) at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg.
Cytarabine will be administered at a dose of 10 mg/m^2 subcutaneously (sc) twice a day (bid).
Active Comparator: Low-dose cytarabine alone
Cytarabine was administered at a dose of 10 mg/m^2 sc bid from days 1-14 of cycle 1. A second identical cycle of cytarabine was given to patients with persistent disease. Patients who achieved a complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete platelet count recovery (CRp), or partial remission (PR) after 1 or 2 cycles received a 14-day consolidation cycle of cytarabine with the doses and schedule identical to the initial treatment cycle. Recovery period up to 4 weeks between the attainment of CR, CRp, or PR and the initiation of consolidation treatment was allowed. Patients who completed consolidation treatment started maintenance treatment of cytarabine at 10 mg/m^2 sc bid on days 1-7 of a 28-day cycle. Patients started maintenance treatment within 42 days after platelet count recovery. Maintenance treatment continued for 2 years or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression.
Cytarabine will be administered at a dose of 10 mg/m^2 subcutaneously (sc) twice a day (bid).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants in Complete Remission (CR)
Time Frame: From baseline through Day 70. Assessments were performed on Day 21 in cycle 1, no later than Day 56 of cycle 1 or 2 (if applicable), and no later than Day 70 of cycle 1 or 2 (if applicable) or at any other time at the discretion of the investigator
The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of subjects in each treatment group who achieved complete remission after treatment with study drug. Complete remission was defined as: 1) Less than 5% blasts in normocellular bone marrow sample. 2) No blasts in bone marrow sample containing Auer rods. 3)Clearance of previous extramedullary disease. 4)Normal values for absolute neutrophil count (at least 1000/microliter), platelet count (at least 100,000/microliter), without platelet transfusions, and in absence of peripheral myeloblasts.
From baseline through Day 70. Assessments were performed on Day 21 in cycle 1, no later than Day 56 of cycle 1 or 2 (if applicable), and no later than Day 70 of cycle 1 or 2 (if applicable) or at any other time at the discretion of the investigator

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Died or Were Censored by 24 Months
Time Frame: From Baseline through 24 months following Baseline
This measure (time to death or censor) was defined for all enrolled subjects from the date of randomization until death from any cause. If a subject was not known to have died by the end of the followup period, observation of overall survival was censored on the date the patient was last known to be alive. The number of participants who died or were censored is presented here. (Note: all subjects participating in this study had either died or were censored by 24 months.)
From Baseline through 24 months following Baseline
Proportion of Participants With Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)Using the Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Time Frame: From Baseline (randomization) through 24 months following Baseline
RFS is defined for patients who achieved a complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp), or partial remission(PR), and was measured from the date of attaining CR, CRp, or PR until the date of AML relapse or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. For a patient not known to have relapsed or died by the end of the study followup, observation of relapse free survival was censored on the date of the last followup examination. The Kaplan Meier Estimate of relapse-free survival at Month 3 and Month 6 is presented here.
From Baseline (randomization) through 24 months following Baseline
Number of Participants Who Experienced Early Death
Time Frame: 14 days from start of study drug treatment
Early death is defined as death from any cause within the first 14 days after start of study drug treatment. The number of patients in each study group who experienced early death is presented here.
14 days from start of study drug treatment
Number of Participants Who Experienced Induction (Thirty-Day) Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 30 days following start of study drug treatment
The number of subjects who died from any cause within the first 30 days after the start of study drug treatment is presented here.
Up to 30 days following start of study drug treatment
Proportion of Participants Surviving at 6 Months and 12 Months Using the Kaplan Meier Estimate
Time Frame: Baseline through 12 months
The duration of overall survival was defined for all patients and was measured from the date of randomization until death from any cause. For a patient who was not known to have died by the end of the follow-up period, observation of overall survival was censored on the date the patient was last known to be alive. The estimate of likelihood of survival at 6 and 12 months after Baseline using the Kaplan Meier Estimate is presented here.
Baseline through 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

August 8, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 1, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Arsenic trioxide

3
Subscribe