Feedback of Treatment Intensification Data to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease Risk (FIT) (FIT)

August 1, 2012 updated by: Kaiser Permanente
The primary research question of this study is to determine whether measuring, reporting and feeding back information to primary care teams on the need for treatment intensification in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) can improve rates of treatment intensification and reduce levels of poorly controlled systolic blood pressure, LDL-c, and A1c.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Project Description: We propose a cluster randomized trial intervention involving eight or more medical facilities of Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KP) and more than 65,000 patients at high risk for CVD. At intervention facilities, patient-level information obtained from KP's electronic health record on the need for treatment intensification (for systolic blood pressure, LDL-c, and A1c) and on recent medication adherence are added to a population management database and fed back through software currently used by staff working with primary care providers. Staff at control facilities continue to use the same population management database and software but only receive information on risk factor levels and selected medications.

Specific Aims:

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of measurement and feedback of treatment intensification information in patients at high risk of CVD for improving rates of treatment intensification and for reducing levels of poorly controlled systolic blood pressure, LDL-c, and A1c.
  2. Evaluate the impact of the intervention, compared with current practice, on total numbers of patient contacts, outpatient visits, and costs of care in relation to improvements in risk factor control.
  3. Evaluate the effect of this innovation on physician and staff perceptions of the value (effectiveness and efficiency) of the population management program for high-risk patients.

Relevance: If this translational study shows that feedback of information on treatment intensification leads to higher rates of intensification and improved risk factor control, this finding will have shown a population-level use of health information technology for improving clinical quality and will also have validated treatment intensification as a metric of clinical quality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16584

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Oakland, California, United States, 94612
        • Kaiser Permanente - Division of Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Among the randomized medical facilities, we will study a population that is drawn from the PHASE registry and includes patients with at least one of the following:

  • Diabetes, coronary artery disease; congestive heart failure; stroke/tia; peripheral artery disease; chronic kidney disease; hypertension; or hyperlipidemia
  • PHASE patients must be in poor control for at least one CVD risk factor and meet study criteria for needing treatment intensification at some point during the 6-month period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All patients eligible for the study will be included in the analyses
  • There will be no exclusions based on clinical or other criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
The study will use automated databases and PHASE information systems to identify patients and incorporate feedback on a monthly basis into the ongoing reports used by program staff at facilities randomized to this intervention arm (n=4).
This study will evaluate an information feedback intervention: measuring, reporting and feeding back information to primary care teams on the need for treatment intensification in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD).
No Intervention: 2
Usual care facilities (n=4) will continue to use current PHASE reports that include information on recent risk factor levels and current use of selected medications but no treatment intensification information, and no information on medication adherence.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Tightly-linked processes (i.e., was treatment intensified more frequently) measured in the 3 months after initial reporting of need for intensification; and mean levels of intermediate outcomes (SBP, LDL-c, and A1c), measured for all study population.
Time Frame: 3 months; 1 year
3 months; 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportions in control for each risk factor; treatment intensification and risk factor improvements in subgroups; and efficiency in terms of patient contacts, visits and costs per unit improvement in risk factor control.
Time Frame: 3 months; 1 year
3 months; 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joe V Selby, MD, MPH, Kaiser Permenante, Division of Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

August 17, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 3, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2012

Last Verified

August 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RFA-HS-07-002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk Factors

Clinical Trials on Information feedback intervention

Subscribe