Functional Behavioural Skill Training for Young Children With Severe Autism

December 4, 2008 updated by: Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

LAY SUMMARY:

IBI is costly and there are currently long waitlists of children who are in need of treatment. The investigators have clinical and ethical obligations to determine more appropriate alternatives to IBI for children making few gains because all children with autism deserve treatment based on their needs. This study is designed to determine the effectiveness of a functional skills group intervention, based on the principles of applied behaviour analysis, for children responding slowly to IBI. Specifically, it will investigate the effectiveness of functional behavioural skills training in addition to IBI at increasing a child's independence in day to day communication and self-help skills and reducing behaviour problems, as well as increasing parental competence and decreasing caregiver strain compared with IBI alone. Having an effective alternative to IBI for children making few gains is relevant from the standpoint of i) preventing exposure to potentially intrusive interventions for those children making few gains in IBI, ii) allowing children making few gains in IBI to access effective treatment, iii) opening limited IBI spots for children who would benefit from IBI, and iv) making better use of limited health resources. Overall, the results will be of interest to parent, clinicians, researchers and funding bodies.

HYPOTHESES

Four main hypotheses are presented to examine the effectiveness of involvement in the ABA functional skills group in improving parent training and functional skills and behaviour in young children with ASD who do not master the ELM. We focus our hypotheses on child measures of functional self help skills, behaviour and cognition as well as parental measures of caregiver strain and sense of competence.

Participants (i.e. children predicted to have poor response to IBI alone) who attend the functional skills group for 8 months will have:

  1. greater decreases in interfering behaviour as measured on the Developmental Behaviour Checklist and ratings of behaviour during observations compared to children receiving IBI alone.
  2. greater increases in self-help as measured on the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scales II, and greater independence in eating, toileting, requesting, hand washing, and responding to name as measured by independent ratings of these skills compared with those children receiving IBI alone.
  3. parents of these children will have greater improvements in their sense of competence as a parent and greater reductions in caregiver strain, compared with parents of children receiving IBI alone.
  4. a similar pattern of little or no change in cognitive function compared with children who receive only IBI based on the Stanford Binet. In other words, there will be no difference between the experimental and control group on the measure of cognitive functioning

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4L8
        • Recruiting
        • McMaster University
        • Contact:
          • Jo-Ann Reitzel, PhD.
          • Phone Number: 77922 905-521-2100
          • Email: reitzel@hhsc.ca
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jo-Ann Reitzel, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Peter Szatmari, MD, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, MD, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jane Summers, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children receiving Intensive Behavioural Intervention from the Hamilton Niagara Regional Early Autism Intervention Program who do not master the Early Learning Measure after 4 months of treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children receiving Intensive Behavioural Intervention from the Hamilton Niagara Regional Early Autism Intervention Program who master the Early Learning Measure after 4 months of treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Parenting Sense of Competence
Time Frame: Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Child Behavioural Skills Assessment
Time Frame: Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Child Intellectual Functioning
Time Frame: Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Child Language Functioning
Time Frame: Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Child Adaptive Behaviour
Time Frame: Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Child Maladaptive Behaviour
Time Frame: Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Caregiver Strain
Time Frame: Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Parent Behaviour Skills Assessment
Time Frame: Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention
Before entry to and upon exit from the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jo-Ann Reitzel, PhD., McMaster University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

August 21, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 5, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2008

Last Verified

July 1, 2008

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autistic Disorder

Clinical Trials on Functional Behavioural Skills Group and Parent Training

Subscribe