Aflibercept in Combination With Docetaxel in Metastatic Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer (VENICE)

June 21, 2016 updated by: Sanofi

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Aflibercept Versus Placebo Administered Every 3 Weeks in Patients Treated With Docetaxel/ Prednisone for Metastatic Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer

Primary objective was to demonstrate overall survival improvement with aflibercept compared to placebo in patients receiving docetaxel / prednisone for metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer (MAIPC).

The secondary objectives were:

  • To assess the efficacy of aflibercept compared to placebo on other parameters such prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, cancer related pain, progression free survival (PFS), tumor-based and skeletal events and health-related quality of life (HRQL);
  • To assess the overall safety in both treatment arms;
  • To determine the pharmacokinetics of intravenous (IV) aflibercept in this population;
  • to determine immunogenicity of IV aflibercept.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study consisted in 3-week treatment cycles until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or participant's refusal of further study treatment. After disease progression, participants were to be followed every 3 months until death or the study cutoff date, whichever came first.

The study cut-off date was event-driven and was defined as the date when 873 deaths had occurred.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1224

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Macquarie Park, Australia
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Diegem, Belgium
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Laval, Canada
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Providencia Santiago, Chile
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • City of Zagreb, Croatia
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Praha, Czech Republic
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Horsholm, Denmark
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Tallinn, Estonia
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Paris, France
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Frankfurt, Germany
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Natanya, Israel
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Milan, Italy
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Gouda, Netherlands
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Warsaw, Poland
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Porto Salvo, Portugal
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Singapore, Singapore
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Gauteng, South Africa
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Bromma, Sweden
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Geneva, Switzerland
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Kiev, Ukraine
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
      • Guildford Surrey, United Kingdom
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
    • New Jersey
      • Bridgewater, New Jersey, United States, 08807
        • Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically- or cytologically-confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma;
  • Metastatic disease;
  • Progressive disease while receiving hormonal therapy or after surgical castration;
  • Effective castration.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer, except estramustine and except adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment completed >3 years ago;
  • Prior treatment with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) inhibitors or VEGF receptor inhibitors;
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >2.

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo added to standard chemotherapy with docetaxel plus prednisone or prednisolone

Sterile aqueous buffered solution identical to aflibercept

1-hour IV on Day 1 of each 3-Week cycle

Marketed formulation

75 mg/m², 1 hour IV on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle (immediately after Aflibercept or placebo)

Other Names:
  • Taxotere®

Marketed formulation

5 mg twice daily PO from day 1 continuously

Experimental: Aflibercept
Aflibercept added to standard chemotherapy with docetaxel plus prednisone or prednisolone

Marketed formulation

75 mg/m², 1 hour IV on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle (immediately after Aflibercept or placebo)

Other Names:
  • Taxotere®

Marketed formulation

5 mg twice daily PO from day 1 continuously

25 mg/ml solution

6 mg/kg, 1-hour IV on Day 1 of each 3-Week cycle

Other Names:
  • AVE0005
  • ZALTRAP®)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival Time
Time Frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Overall survival (OS) time was measured as the time from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.

The median OS time and its 95.6% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of confirmation of death, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date (when 873 deaths have occurred), whichever was earlier.

From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prostate Specific Antigen Response Rate
Time Frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to PSA progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response was defined as ≥50% decrease from baseline in serum PSA levels, confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases of any magnitude during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining PSA response.
Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to PSA progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first
Time to Skeletal Related Events
Time Frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Skeletal Related Events (SRE) included pathological fractures and/or spinal cord compression, need for bone irradiation, including radioisotopes or bone surgery, change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain.

Time to SRE was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of occurence of the first event defining a SRE or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

The median time to SRE and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of SRE, the participant was censored at the last date he/she was known to be alive or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.

From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)
Progression Free Survival Time
Time Frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Disease progression was defined as a composite of: Radiological tumor progression (≥20% increase in target lesions, or appearance of at least 2 new bone lesions); PSA progression (≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later); Pain progression (increase in pain intensity or in analgesic consumption for cancer related pain confirmed 3 weeks later); Radiotherapy for cancer related symptoms; Occurence of Skeletal related events (SRE).

Progression Free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of occurrence of the first event defining a disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

The median PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of disease progression, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.

From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)
Tumor Response Rate in Participants With Measurable Disease
Time Frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 months up to tumor progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first
Tumor response was defined as either a Complete Response (disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (≥30% decrease from baseline in target lesions) as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)version 1.0.
Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 months up to tumor progression (≥25% increase) or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first
Prostate Specific Antigen Progression-free Survival Time
Time Frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) progression was defined as ≥25% increase in PSA level confirmed 3 weeks later, above the nadir in participants who had achieved a PSA response, or above the baseline in participants who hadn't achieved a PSA response.

PSA progression-free survival (PFS) time was defined as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of the first documented PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

The median PSA-PFS time and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of PSA progression or death, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.

From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)
Pain Progression-free Survival Time
Time Frame: From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)

Pain progression was defined as either ≥1-point increase in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score or ≥25% increase in Analgesics Score (AS) confirmed at least 3 weeks later, or requirement for palliative radiotherapy. PPI scale is a self-report 0-5 scale to assess pain intensity - a score 0 reflects no pain, a score 5 reflects excruciating pain. AS is a scoring method to assess analgesics consumption. Each analgesic is scored 1 or 4 depending on the analgesic type and dose. AS is the sum of the analgesic scores.

Pain progression-free survival (PFS) time was measured as the time from the date of randomization up to the date of first pain progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.

The median pain-PFS and its 95% confidence interval were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the absence of event, the participant was censored at the the date of last assessment without evidence of pain progression or the study cut-off date, whichever was earlier.

From randomization up to the cut-off date (median follow-up of 35.4 months)
Pain Response Rate
Time Frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to pain progression or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first
Pain response was defined as either a ≥2-point decrease from baseline in Present Pain Intensity (PPI) score without increase in Analgesics Score (AS), or a ≥50% decrease from baseline in AS without increase in the PPI score confirmed at least 3 weeks later. Increases in PPI or AS during the first 12 weeks were ignored in determining pain response.
Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks up to pain progression or the cut-off date, whichever occurred first
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Total Score as a Measure of Health Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks until disease progression or administration of further antitumor therapy, whichever came first

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) is a 39-item participant questionnaire that measures the concerns of patients with prostate cancer. It consists of 5 subscales assessing physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate-specific concerns.

FACT-P total score is the sum of the 5 subscores. It ranges from 0 to 156 with higher score indicating better quality of life.

Before randomization (baseline) then every 3 weeks until disease progression or administration of further antitumor therapy, whichever came first
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety
Time Frame: From first dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came first) to last dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came last) + 30 days

Adverse Events (AE) are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study.

AE were collected at regular intervals throughout the study then graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v.3.0).

From first dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came first) to last dose of study treatment (aflibercept/placebo or docetaxel whichever came last) + 30 days
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-aflibercept Antibody Levels as a Measure of Immunogenicity of Aflibercept
Time Frame: Pre-dose of cycle 1 (baseline), pre-dose of each every other cycle, then 30 and 90 days after the last administration of the study drug

Serum for detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) was collected in patients treated in selected centers only. Samples were analyzed using a titer-based, bridging immunoassay developed and validated to detect ADAs in human serum.

Samples with positive antibody levels were further analyzed using a validated, non-quantitative ligand binding assay to detect neutralizing antibodies Ab).

A participant was considered to have positive antibody levels if antibodies were detected above the quantification limits.

Pre-dose of cycle 1 (baseline), pre-dose of each every other cycle, then 30 and 90 days after the last administration of the study drug

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

August 22, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 22, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2016

Last Verified

June 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostatic Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Placebo (for aflibercept)

Subscribe