Randomized Controlled Trial of Routine Screening for IPV

July 29, 2013 updated by: Joanne Klevens, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Randomized Controlled Trial of Routine Screening for Intimate Partner Violence

This is a randomized controlled trial with three arms to establish the impact of screening and referral to services for women disclosing exposure to IPV.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Approximately 2675 women* will be enrolled and randomized to one of 3 arms. In the first arm, participants will be screened, and if disclosing IPV, will receive information on available resources in the community. In arms two and three, participants will not be screened, but one group will receive information on available resources in the community and the other will not. All three groups will be assessed for quality of life (SF-12;standardized and validated scale with 12 questions that measure overall health (1 item), physical functioning (2 items), role limitations due to physical health problems (4 items), bodily pain (1 item), energy/fatigue (1 item), social functioning (1 item), psychological distress (1 item), and well being (1 item) in the past 4 weeks; items are summed to form a physical health composite scale and a mental health composite scale; each scale is standardized to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 for the U.S. population with a possible range from 0 to 100; higher scores represent a better health state); disability; and utilization of health care and IPV services at baseline and at a 12 month follow-up. A pilot study, also using a randomized controlled trial design, will establish the feasibility, acceptability, and impact on disclosure rates, use of referral resources, and potential harms of three screening and referral strategies.

*sample size calculation based n needed to detect a standardized effect size of 0.3 with an α=.05 (1-tailed)and ß=.20 if there's a 20% IPV (+) rate and 30% lost-to-follow-up rate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2700

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
        • Fantus Health clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women attending obstetrics & gynecology (OB-GYN), family planning, general medicine, family medicine or HIV/Sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-English speaking other than Spanish speakers
  • accompanied by a child >3 years of age without adequate provision for child care;
  • Visually- or hearing-impaired women;
  • without access to a telephone;
  • Severe Mental impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Screened
Screened w/4 questions on intimate partner violence; if positive, receives referral information
Asked 4 questions on current exposure to intimate partner violence; if positive, receives referral information
Active Comparator: Universal education
all participants receive partner violence referral information
receives referral information
No Intervention: Control
no screen and no referral

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life, Physical Health Composite
Time Frame: at one-year follow-up
Assessed with Quality of Life SF-12 V.2 (Ware, Kosinski,Turner-Bowker, & Gandek, 2002). This instrument has 12 items measuring eight subscales of mental and physical health-general health, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, bodily pain, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, and mental health (psychological distress)-during the past 4 weeks. These subscales are combined to form a physical health composite scale and a mental health composite scale. Each scale is standardized to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 for the U.S. population with a possible range from 0 to 100; higher scores represent a better health state.
at one-year follow-up
Quality of Life, Mental Health Composite
Time Frame: past 30 days
Assessed with the Quality of Life SF-12 v.2 (Ware, Kosinski, Turner-Bowker, & Gandek, 2002). This instrument has 12 items measuring eight subscales of mental and physical health-general health, physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to emotional problems, bodily pain, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, and mental health (psychological distress)-during the past 4 weeks. These subscales are combined to form a physical health composite scale and a mental health composite scale. Each scale is standardized to have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 for the U.S. population with a possible range from 0 to 100; higher scores represent a better health state.
past 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Utilization of Health Care
Time Frame: during past year
number of ambulatory care visits
during past year
Disability
Time Frame: one year follow-up
days lost from housework
one year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joanne Klevens, MD, PhD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

September 10, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 31, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2013

Last Verified

July 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 200-2006-15969/200-2008-28219
  • IRB #4984
  • IRB #4985
  • OMB # 0920-06BM
  • Contract #200-2008-28219
  • & 200-2006-15969

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on screened

Subscribe