Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell Revision Study

November 17, 2017 updated by: Stryker Orthopaedics

A Post-market, Non-randomized, Open Label, Multi-center Clinical Study of the Trident Tritanium Acetabular Shell

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a hip implant system used when a previous hip replacement surgery has failed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Total hip replacement is considered to be a very successful surgical procedure for the treatment of degenerative joint disease. Clinical results for cementless acetabular components have demonstrated excellent long-term fixation of these devices. However, so called 'first generation' cementless acetabular components have not had similar success rates. In these cases the acetabular component is often revised due to loosening, wear or infection.

Revision hip arthroplasty also becomes a challenge as patients often present with severe bone loss and poor bone quality. This can lead to compromised initial stability, which in turn leads to lack of long-term fixation and failure. Acetabular revision with a cementless component has shown improved results over cemented fixation.

Radiographic evaluation of the Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell will provide valuable early to intermediate information that may help predict the long-term success of this new system.

It is the intention of this study to closely follow subjects that have undergone revision hip replacement with regard to implant survivorship, signs of radiographic loosening, subjects' function evaluated through Harris Hip Score and Lower Extremity Activity Scale, subject quality of life through SF-36 and adverse events.

The primary efficacy hypothesis is that the rate of revision or pending revision (as defined by radiographic parameters) due to instability or lack of fixation for the Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell will be less than 10% at 5 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

241

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Orthopedic Specialty Institute
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32204
        • Heekin Institute for Orthopedic Research, Inc.
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Cedars Medical Center
    • Illinois
      • Glenview, Illinois, United States, 60025
        • Illinois Bone & Joint Institute
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
        • University of Louisville, 201 Abraham Flexner Way, Suite 100
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02120
        • New England Baptist Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States, 48197
        • St Joseph Mercy Hospital
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
        • NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases
    • Ohio
      • Akron, Ohio, United States, 44333
        • Crystal Clinic
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The Methodist Hospital
      • Temple, Texas, United States, 76508
        • Scott & White Memorial Hospital
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99202
        • Rockwood Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males and non-pregnant females, 21-85 years of age at the time of surgery.
  2. Patient is a candidate for a revision of a failed acetabular component with a cementless acetabular component.
  3. Patient has signed an IRB approved study consent form.
  4. Patient is willing and able to comply with postoperative requirements including postoperative weight bearing restrictions and self-evaluations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is morbidly obese, BMI > 40.
  2. Patient has a systemic or metabolic bone disorder leading to progressive bone deterioration.
  3. Patient is immunologically compromised or receiving steroids in excess of normal physiological requirements (> 30 days).
  4. Patient's bone stock is compromised by disease or infection which cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the prosthesis.
  5. Patient has an active or suspected latent infection on or about the hip joint.
  6. Patient is a prisoner.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell
Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell used in revision total hip replacement
Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Hips Requiring Revision or Pending Revision of the Acetabular Shell (as Defined by Radiographic Parameters) Due to Instability or Lack of Fixation
Time Frame: 5 years post-operative
5 years post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Harris Hip Score (HHS) From Pre-operative to Post-operative Visits
Time Frame: pre-op, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
The change in HHS is reported by comparing the mean pre-operative, 3-month, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 year post-operative scores. Scores can range from 0 to 100, with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best score. 90-100 = excellent, 80-89 = good, 70-79 = fair, 0-69 = poor.
pre-op, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
Change in SF-36 From Pre-operative to Post-operative Visits
Time Frame: pre-op, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
The change in SF-36 is reported by comparing the mean preoperative, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 year scores. The SF-36 Health Survey is a 36 item patient-completed questionnaire to measure general health and well-being. It includes a physical and mental status component score; each ranging from 0-100. Low values represent a poor health state and high values represent a good health state.
pre-op, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
Radiographic Outcomes: Radiolucency (RLL) Around the Acetabular Shell is Greater Than 2 mm in All Zones
Time Frame: 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
Defined as a lucent area seen parallel and in close proximity to the device at the prosthesis/bone interface encompassing at least 50% of the zone, and at least 1 mm or greater in width. May be accompanied by a radiopaque (reactive) line. Assessed for each of the three modified DeLee Charnley zones.
3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
Radiographic Outcomes: Migration of the Acetabular Shell Greater Than 5 mm in Any Direction
Time Frame: 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
Defined as the measurable change in the acetabular shell position relative to reproducible bony landmarks.
3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
Change in Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) From Pre-operative to Post-operative
Time Frame: pre-op, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
The change in LEAS is reported by comparing the mean pre-operative, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 year scores. The LEAS is completed by the participant to assess activity level. Activity levels were ordered in terms of intensity from 1 to 18, with 18 indicating the highest activity level.
pre-op, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin Bierbaum, MD, New England Baptist Hospital
  • Study Chair: Arthur Malkani, MD, University of Louisville
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Masini, MD, St Joseph Mercy Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Ward, MD, New England Baptist Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Kirby Hitt, MD, Scott & White Memorial Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Kenneth Greene, MD, Crystal Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Jim Kudrna, MD, Illinois Bone & Joint Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Ivan Tomek, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Kantor, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Steven Barnett, MD, Orthopedic Specialty Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Carlos Higuera, MD, The Cleveland Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph Zuckerman, MD, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases
  • Principal Investigator: Fredrick Jaffe, MD, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases
  • Principal Investigator: Stephen Incavo, MD, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Timothy Lovell, MD, Rockwood Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: Sean Scully, MD, Cedars Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Amar Ranawat, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
  • Principal Investigator: Geoffrey Westrich, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
  • Principal Investigator: R D Heekin, MD, Heekin Institute for Orthopedic Research, Inc.
  • Principal Investigator: Bryce Allen, MD, Scott & White Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

September 26, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 61

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

Clinical Trials on Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell

Subscribe