Radiation Following Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty to Prevent Restenosis (RADAR)

September 30, 2019 updated by: Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation

RADiation Following Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty to Prevent Restenosis

The objective of the RADAR trial is to determine the impact of External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) on aortic valve restenosis following successful percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in elderly patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The RADAR trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, two-stage, adaptive clinical trial. Following successful Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty, patients with severe aortic stenosis will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) plus standard medical therapy or standard medical therapy along with sham EBRT (placebo). During Stage One, approximately 110 patients will be enrolled in order to have 80 patients randomized and 66 patients with valid 6 month data. The sample size for Stage Two will be calculated at the end of Stage One. At the time of study commencement, the expectation is that the total sample size will be approximately 155 patients with valid 6-month data, and thus 195 will be randomized and up to 250 enrolled.

Patients will be followed for a period of two (2) years. Echocardiographic and clinical endpoint data will be collected and analyzed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55407
        • Abbott Northwestern Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • Lindner Clinical Trial Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

75 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Calcific aortic valve stenosis with an echocardiographically derived AV index of less than 0.45 cm2/m2.
  • Any symptoms of severe AS, including near syncope/syncope, angina, excessive fatigue and/or shortness of breath with NYHA functional class II-IV limitation.
  • Age greater than 75 and risk of aortic valve replacement surgery greater than or equal to 15 percent. This may be assessed by using the STS Risk Predictor (see appendix C), confirmed by consultation with a cardiac surgeon experienced in high risk aortic valve surgery
  • OR by having a cardiac surgeon experienced in high risk aortic valve surgery document comorbid conditions (such as porcelain aorta, malnutrition or other comorbidities not captured by the STS scoring system) that make the risk greater than or equal to 15 percent by the estimation of the surgeon.
  • If age greater than or equal to 90 a cardiac surgeon experienced in high risk aortic valve surgery must document that BAV is a better option for the patient than aortic valve replacement surgery.
  • Probable survival greater than 6 months after successful valvuloplasty.
  • Patient is competent, willing to comply with follow-up, understands risks, benefits and alternatives and has signed the Informed Consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has undergone previous BAV or AVR.
  • Patient is undergoing BAV as a bridge to AVR.
  • 4 plus (severe) Aortic insufficiency by echocardiogram obtained prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Known congenital AV abnormality (e.g., bicuspid AV).
  • ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) associated with CKMB greater than or equal to 3 times ULN or stroke less than or equal to 6 weeks prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Bacterial endocarditis less than or equal to 1 year prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 30% by preprocedural echocardiography.
  • Baseline mean AV gradient less than 30 mm Hg by echocardiogram unless associated with a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40 per cent and true severe AS confirmed by dobutamine stress echocardiogram, i.e., AVA index less than or equal to 0.45cm2/m2 at peak dobutamine infusion. See Appendix D for suggested protocol.
  • Patients who do not achieve successful BAV performed as a part of RADAR Trial: success being defined as an improvement in 4-24 hour post-valvuloplasty echocardiographically-derived AVA that is greater than 35 per cent over baseline and AVA greater than or equal to 0.7 cm2 and the absence of 4+ plus AI.
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with drug eluting stent placement less than or equal to 6 months prior to planned BAV procedure or bare metal stent placement/balloon angioplasty less than or equal to 8 weeks prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Cardiogenic shock, as defined by a consistent systolic blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg off vasopressors or less than 90 mm Hg on vasopressors.
  • Patients requiring ventilator support less than or equal to 48 hours prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Creatinine greater than 2.2 mg/dL less than or equal to 48 hours prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Platelet count less than or equal to 100,000/mm3 less than or equal to 48 hours prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Hemoglobin less than or equal to 9.0 gm/dL less than or equal to 48 hours prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Known allergy/sensitivity to ASA.
  • Known allergy/sensitivity to both clopidogrel and ticlopidine.
  • Gastrointestinal bleed requiring transfusion less than or equal to 2 weeks prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Prior external beam radiation therapy to the chest that, in the judgment of the radiation oncologist, will compromise patient safety or interfere with the interpretation of the study results. This includes any prior radiation to the thoracic contents, except for radiation treatments for malignant or benign lesions of the skin.
  • Untreated pneumonia or other systemic infection associated with fever greater than 38.5˚c or WBC count greater than 10,000 less than or equal to 72 hours prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Concomitant medical illness (for example, terminal malignancy) that in the opinion of the investigator is associated with reduced survival of less than 6 months.
  • Major surgery less than or equal to 2 weeks prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Any illness or condition which, in the Investigator's judgment, will interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the protocol, compromise patient safety, or interfere with the interpretation of the study results.
  • Involvement in any study of an investigational drug, device or procedure less than or equal to 30 days prior to planned BAV procedure.
  • Previous enrollment in this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EBRT
External beam radiation therapy to the aortic valve after successful balloon aortic valvuloplasty.
Experimental beam radiation therapy to the aortic valve after successful balloon aortic valvuloplasty
Sham Comparator: Control
Sham external beam radiation therapy to the aortic valve after successful balloon aortic valvuloplasty.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Aortic Valve Area as a Continuous Variable, Measured by Echocardiography
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Incidence of Major External Beam Radiation Therapy-related Complications
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NYHA Improvement
Time Frame: 6 months

Improvement from pre-procedural NYHA class. Patients' heart failure were graded according to the severity of their symptoms. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification was used. It places patients in one of four categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity.

I No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

II Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

III Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea.

IV Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

6 months
CHF Rehospitalization
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Aortic Valve Reintervention
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Aortic Valve Area Late Loss Index
Time Frame: 6 months
The difference between the Aortic Valve Area at 6 months and the Aortic Valve Area post procedure indexed to the subject
6 months
Aortic Valve Mean Gradient
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wes R Pedersen, MD, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

October 3, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Stenosis

Clinical Trials on External beam radiation therapy

3
Subscribe