Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) as Transfusion Indicator in Neurocritical Patients

March 21, 2016 updated by: Santiago R. Leal-Noval, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío

Phase II Study of Usefulness of Near Infrared Spectroscopy to Optimize Red Blood Cells Transfusion in Neuro Critical Ill Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage or Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Neurocritical ill patients are frequently transfused. Red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) in these patients has been associated with deleterious effects, including higher rates of nosocomial infections, multi-organ failure, and mortality. Therefore, it seems crucial to avoid any unnecessary RBCT.

Most critically ill patients tolerate hemoglobin levels near 7 g/dL without an increase in morbidity or mortality rates. In this regard, a recent sub-analysis of TRICC trial has showed that TBI patients may tolerate hemoglobin levels as low as 7 g/dL, but other studies including neurocritical patients suggested that severe anemia may worsen clinical outcome. Therefore, optimal hemoglobin levels in neurocritical care patients remain largely unknown. Some textbooks and guidelines recommend to transfuse these patients to reach hemoglobin levels near to 10 g/dL, despite the lack of a solid scientific background supporting this target.

Even though it has not been demonstrated, hemoglobin-based RBCT prescription could result in over- or under-transfusion in neurocritical patients. Alternatively, it has been suggested that more physiological transfusion triggers, using direct signals coming from the brain, will progressively replace arbitrary hemoglobin-based transfusion triggers in the neurocritical patients [65]. At the neurocritical units, patients are often monitored by using non-invasive methods, such as near infrared spectroscopy which indirectly measures regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2). Changes in rSO2 values have been shown to directly correlate with changes in erythrocyte mass, thus increasing with RBCT and decreasing with blood losses. Moreover, rSO2 values also show a good correlation with clinical outcome and other variables which are often monitored in TBI patients.

The purpose of this study is to ascertain as to whether rSO2 levels are more efficacious than conventional hemoglobin levels in guiding RBCT in patients admitted to a neurocritical care unit.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seville, Spain, 41013
        • Hospital Universitario "Virgen del Rocío"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow coma scale < 9), subarachnoid hemorrhage (Hunt and Hess scale ≥ 3) or intracranial hemorrhage
  • Moderate anemia. Hemoglobin levels > 7 g/dL and < 10 g/dL
  • Hemodynamical stability (mean arterial pressure > 75 mm Hg)
  • Respiratory stability (PaO2 / FiO2 ratio > 220)
  • Expected length of ICU stay > 3 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's relatives' refusal to patient's inclusion in the study
  • Active bleeding
  • Ongoing need for blood products
  • Patients necessitating ongoing resuscitation
  • End-stage in which death is imminent
  • Antecedents of angina or myocardial infarction (poor cardiopulmonary reserve)
  • Deficient signal of rSO2 impeding its proper valuation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: RBCT based on rSO2 value
Intervention: In the rSO2 - strategy group, patients will be transfused to attain a post-transfusion rSO2 values higher than 60%.
Patients will be transfused (one to one red blood cells unit transfusion)
Active Comparator: RBCT based on hemoglobin level value
Intervention: In the hemoglobin - strategy group, patients will be transfused to reach post-transfusion hemoglobin levels between 8.5 g/dL and 10 g/dL.
Patients will be transfused (one to one red blood cells unit transfusion)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Units of Packed Red Blood Cell Transfused
Time Frame: duration of the protocol, an average of 15 days
Number of units of packed packed red blood cell transfused, over the period that the patient was included into the protocol
duration of the protocol, an average of 15 days
Percentage of Transfused Patients in Each Group
Time Frame: duration of the protocol, an average of 15 days
duration of the protocol, an average of 15 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Mortality
Time Frame: length of the hospital stay, an average of 20 days
length of the hospital stay, an average of 20 days
Length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay
Time Frame: The length of ICU stay, an avarege of 17 days
The length of ICU stay, an avarege of 17 days
Long-term Mortality
Time Frame: 1-year after hospital discharge
1-year after hospital discharge
Unfavorable Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)
Time Frame: At hospital discharge, an average of 21 days

GOS measures the degree of disability associated with the brain injury

Unfavorable GOS included the categories of:

  1. death.
  2. vegetative status.
  3. severe disability.
At hospital discharge, an average of 21 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Santiago R Leal-Noval, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario "Virgen del Rocío", Seville, Spain
  • Study Chair: Victoria Arellano, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario "Virgen del Rocío", Seville, Spain
  • Study Chair: Rosario Amaya, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario "Virgen del Rocío", Seville, Spain
  • Study Chair: Antonio M Puppo, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario "Virgen del Rocío", Seville, Spain
  • Study Chair: Carmen M Ferrándiz, MD, Hospital Universitario "Virgen del Rocío", Seville, Spain
  • Study Chair: Antonio J Marín, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario "Virgen del Rocío", Seville, Spain
  • Study Director: Francisco Murillo, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario "Virgen del Rocío", Seville, Spain
  • Study Chair: Manuel Muñoz, Prof, MD, PhD, Prof Transfusion Medicine University of Malaga, Spain
  • Study Chair: Vicente Padilla, MD, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
  • Study Chair: Yael Corcia, MD, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
  • Study Chair: Aurelio Cayuela, MD, PhD, Hospital Universitario "Virgen del Rocío"

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 3, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Red blood cells transfusion

3
Subscribe