A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Peanut Sublingual Immunotherapy Trial

Sublingual Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I/II Pilot Study With a Whole Peanut Extract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and immune response to daily sublingual (under the tongue) immunotherapy (SLIT) with peanut extract in adults and children with peanut allergies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Peanut allergy is a common ailment in the United States. Research suggests that the prevalence of peanut allergy in the United States has doubled over the last 5 years. Currently, the only effective treatment for peanut allergy is a peanut-free diet and quick access to self-injectable epinephrine in the event of peanut exposure. The sublingual route is a potential method to administer immunotherapy for the treatment of food allergies. The intent of this study is to induce desensitization and eventually tolerance to peanut protein and evaluate the safety and immunologic effects of daily sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for individuals with peanut allergy. The trial will enroll 40 participants. After the first 10 participants between the ages of 18 and 40 are enrolled, safety information will be reviewed. If there are no safety concerns, the study will continue to enroll the remaining participants between the ages of 12 and 40.

This clinical trial will last 172 to 216 weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive peanut SLIT or placebo SLIT. All participants will have an entry oral food challenge (OFC). The treatment group will receive gradual dosing escalations of peanut SLIT and maintenance therapy over a 44-week period, followed by another OFC. Following the OFC, participants will be unblinded, and the placebo group will receive peanut SLIT escalated to a higher maximum dose than the first treatment group. Maintenance therapy will continue for both groups for more than 2 years.

Study visits will occur every 2 weeks during dosing escalations of peanut SLIT, followed by visits gradually spacing out during maintenance to every 12 weeks. At selected visits, a physical examination, skin prick tests, blood and urine collection, and atopic dermatitis and asthma evaluations will occur. Approximately 6 OFCs will be administered to each participant throughout the course of the study. Additionally, 10 participants will be enrolled as control participants who will not receive any study therapy and will only have blood drawn at 3 visits throughout the course of the trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72202
        • University of Arkansas
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80208
        • National Jewish Medical and Research Center
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21218
        • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27706
        • University of North Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 40 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physician-diagnosed peanut allergy OR convincing clinical history of peanut allergy
  • Reacts to a cumulative dose of 2,000 mg or less of peanut powder
  • Positive peanut allergy skin prick test OR detectable serum peanut-specific IgE level
  • Willing to use an acceptable method of contraception for the duration of the study
  • Ability to perform spirometry maneuver in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guidelines

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe anaphylaxis to peanut
  • Currently participating in a study using a new investigational new drug
  • Participation in any interventional study for the treatment of food allergy in the 12 months prior to study entry
  • Allergic to placebo ingredients (glycerin or oat flour) OR reacts to any dose of placebo during study entry oral food challenge (OFC)
  • Currently in a buildup phase of any allergy immunotherapy
  • Poor control of atopic dermatitis
  • Moderate or severe asthma despite therapy
  • Current treatment with greater than medium daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids
  • Use of steroid medications
  • Use of omalizumab or other nontraditional forms of allergen immunomodulatory therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy in the 12 months prior to study entry
  • Use of beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, or calcium channel blockers
  • Inability to discontinue antihistamines for skin testing and OFCs
  • History of ischemic cardiovascular disease
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Other significant medical conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent participation in the study
  • Previous intubation due to allergies or asthma
  • Uncontrolled high blood pressure
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low Dose Peanut SLIT (Double Blind to Open Label)
Subjects ingest peanut protein (glycerinated peanut allergenic extract) daily starting with 0.000165 mcg, followed by a build-up phase (escalating peanut doses every 2 weeks, achieving maintenance dose by 36 weeks). Thereafter, subjects are on a maximally tolerated maintenance dose (165 mcg to 1,386 mcg) for >= 8 weeks. After Week 44, subjects are given a 5,000 mg Oral Food Challenge (OFC) using peanut powder. Subjects/study staff are unblinded following this OFC and continue on an open label peanut protein maintenance dose of 1,386 mcg/day or may attempt escalation up to this dose. Subjects who at the Week 116 OFC are unable to consume >= 5,000 mg peanut powder or 10-fold the amount of peanut powder compared to the baseline OFC will discontinue study therapy. SLIT=Sublingual Immunotherapy.
Glycerinated peanut extract delivered sublingually.
Other Names:
  • Peanut SLIT
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (DB) Crossed Over to High Dose Peanut SLIT (OL)
Subjects ingest placebo (glycerin) daily beginning with a dose of 0.000165 mcg, followed by a build-up phase (escalating placebo doses every 2 weeks, achieving a maintenance dose by 36 weeks). Thereafter, subjects are on a maximally tolerated maintenance dose (165 mcg to 1,386 mcg) for >= 8 weeks. After Week 44, subjects are given a 5,000 mg Oral Food Challenge (OFC) using peanut powder. Subjects/study staff are unblinded following this OFC and subjects no longer receive placebo dosing but are crossed over and receive open label high dose peanut SLIT; the study procedures and schedule are the same as for the Low Dose Peanut SLIT group, the only difference is the maximum maintenance dose is almost 3-fold higher at 3,696 mcg/day. DB=Double Blind, SLIT=Sublingual Immunotherapy, OL=Open Label.
Placebo (glycerin) delivered sublingually.
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed 5,000 mg of Peanut Powder or at Least a 10-fold Increase in the Amount of Peanut Powder Compared to Their Baseline Oral Food Challenge
Time Frame: Week 44 (Double Blind Period)
Desensitization Assessment: Participants who successfully consumed without dose-limiting symptoms 5,000 mg of peanut powder or at least a 10-fold increase in the amount of peanut powder compared to their baseline oral food challenge during a double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge were counted as successes.
Week 44 (Double Blind Period)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Participants Who Achieved a Maintenance Dose of 1,386 mcg
Time Frame: Week 44 (Double Blind Period)
During the build-up phase, escalation was to occur every 2 weeks until the 1,386 mcg maintenance dose was reached. The maximum time allowed for the build-up phase was 36 weeks; the dose achieved by 36 weeks was considered the maintenance dose.
Week 44 (Double Blind Period)
Percent of Crossover Participants Who Successfully Consumed 5,000 mg of Peanut Powder or at Least a 10-fold Increase in the Amount of Peanut Powder Compared to Their Baseline Oral Food Challenge After 44 Weeks of Open Label Peanut Protein Consumption
Time Frame: Week 44 after initiating crossover open label peanut protein consumption
Desensitization Assessment: Participants who successfully consumed without dose-limiting symptoms 5,000 mg of peanut powder or at least a 10-fold increase in the amount of peanut powder compared to their baseline oral food challenge during a double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge were counted as successes.
Week 44 after initiating crossover open label peanut protein consumption
Percent of Crossover Participants Who Achieved an Open Label Peanut Protein Consumption Maintenance Dose of 3,696 mcg
Time Frame: Week 44 after initiating crossover open label peanut protein consumption
During the build-up phase, escalation was to occur every 2 weeks until the 3,696 mcg maintenance dose was reached. The maximum time allowed for the build-up phase was 36 weeks; the dose achieved by 36 weeks was considered the maintenance dose.
Week 44 after initiating crossover open label peanut protein consumption
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline through Week 44 (Double Blind Period)
This study graded the severity of Adverse Events experienced by participants according to the criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.
Baseline through Week 44 (Double Blind Period)
Number of Crossover Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During 44 Weeks of Open Label Peanut Protein Consumption
Time Frame: Initiation of open label peanut protein study therapy through Week 44 of open label peanut protein consumption
All subjects who were in the Placebo group during the double-blind phase of the study who initiated crossover peanut sublingual immunotherapy during the open label phase of the study will be included.
Initiation of open label peanut protein study therapy through Week 44 of open label peanut protein consumption
Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed 10,000 mg of Peanut Powder
Time Frame: Approximately 8 weeks after discontinuing study therapy after 3 years on maintenance study therapy
Tolerance Assessment: Participants who successfully consumed without dose-limiting symptoms 10,000 mg of peanut powder during a double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge were then given an open feeding of peanut butter and those who successfully consumed the open feeding were counted as successes.
Approximately 8 weeks after discontinuing study therapy after 3 years on maintenance study therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Wesley Burks, MD, Duke University
  • Study Chair: David Fleischer, MD, National Jewish Health
  • Principal Investigator: Hugh A. Sampson, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Principal Investigator: Stacie Jones, MD, Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

December 25, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypersensitivity

Clinical Trials on Glycerinated peanut allergenic extract

3
Subscribe