Proparacaine vs Placebo for Corneal Injuries (Dogma)

February 21, 2008 updated by: London Health Sciences Centre

Challenging the Dogma: Topical Proparacaine is Safe and Effective for the Emergency Department Management of Acute Traumatic Corneal Injuries

Introduction: Traumatic injuries to the outer covering of the eye (the cornea) are a common emergency department complaint. They cause significant patient distress including pain, loss of sleep and missed work days. There is currently no accepted, uniform approach to pain management in this patient population. Emergency medicine and ophthalmology texts state that prolonged use of medications that anesthetize the cornea is not recommended. Several recent publications in the ophthalmology literature show that the outpatient use of dilute local anesthesia in patients after eye surgery is a safe and effective method of pain control. In this study, we used Proparacaine (a local anesthetic), in a similar manner, for the outpatient emergency department management of traumatic corneal injuries.

Methods: We performed a clinical trial on a sample of adult patients presenting with traumatic corneal injuries to two university affiliated emergency departments in London, Canada.

Patients providing signed informed consent to participate in the study received a vial of clear liquid that contained either Proparacaine or plain water (placebo), a pain log, topical antibiotics and oral Acetaminophen (Tylenol) with Codeine for breakthrough pain.

Patients were instructed to use the "study drug" on an "as-needed" basis for the next seven days. Patients completed a pain scale describing their discomfort immediately prior to, and five minutes after self-administration of the study drug. All patients were followed closely in an ophthalmology outpatient clinic on Days 1, 3 and 5 after presentation to the emergency department. At the last ophthalmology clinic visit, the patients' pain logs were collected.

The protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Board for Health Sciences Research Involving Human Subjects at the University of Western Ontario.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • London Health Sciences Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients with acute (within 24 hrs) traumatic corneal injuries

Exclusion Criteria:

  • immunocompromised
  • known allergy to local anesthetic
  • unable to consent /follow instructions for dosing / go to follow-up appointments
  • previous ocular pathology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1

patients randomized to 0.05% Proparacaine drops on a PRN basis for up to 7 days

Acetaminophen with Codeine for breakthrough pain

topical Gatifloxacin drops

topical, 0.05% drops, PRN continuously for up to 7 days
Placebo Comparator: 2

placebo drops on a PRN basis for up to 7 days post injury

Acetaminophen with Codeine for breakthrough pain

Gatifloxacin drops

saline drops continuously PRN for up to 7 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
pain reduction
Time Frame: continuous
continuous

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: at 5 days post injury
at 5 days post injury
delayed wound healing
Time Frame: days 3,5 ,7 postinjury
days 3,5 ,7 postinjury

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Scott B Anderson, MD FRCPC, London Health Sciences Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 22, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2008

Last Verified

September 1, 2006

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Corneal Abrasions

Clinical Trials on Proparacaine drops 0.05%

Subscribe