Brain Mechanisms and Targeting Insomnia in Major Depression

August 19, 2010 updated by: University of California, Los Angeles
Preliminary studies suggest that the response to antidepressant medication can be accelerated by targeting insomnia with adjunctive use of eszopiclone. It is not yet known what mechanism(s) support this acceleration in response, though preliminary findings support the hypothesis that early restoration of sleep may facilitate BDNF-based effects of antidepressant medications. The optimal duration of co-treatment is also unknown. This study will test specific hypotheses about brain mechanisms and evaluate the effects of continued eszopiclone beyond the time window when response acceleration should be observed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A critical challenge in the management of major depressive disorder (MDD) is the delay between initiating treatment with an antidepressant medication and clinical improvement. Preliminary studies (Fava et al., 2006; Krystal et al., 2007) suggest that targeting insomnia with eszopiclone (ESZ) in patients receiving fluoxetine may lead to more rapid resolution of symptoms. Studies have not yet been able to differentiate between competing explanations of this phenomenon: whether co-treatment with ESZ actually accelerates changes in the brain associated with antidepressant treatment response, or if its effects on the insomnia component are confined to the symptomatic level ("masking"). As a non-benzodiazepine GABA-receptor agonist with FDA approval for long-term use in the treatment of sleep disturbances, ESZ is an appropriate agent for targeting insomnia in MDD without major concerns around the development of tolerance. Further research in co-treatment would be advanced by understanding the mechanism(s) underlying accelerated improvement.

Our prior work (Cook et al., 2001, 2002, 2005; Leuchter et al. 2002) has studied a new physiologic biomarker of response to SSRI and mixed-action antidepressants. The EEG-based cordance biomarker can detect the physiologic effects of successful antidepressant treatment at 48 hours, 1 week, and 2 weeks of treatment; in contrast, symptom differences between responders and non-responders did not separate until 4 weeks of treatment in our placebo-controlled trials. Additionally, the magnitude of early physiologic change was associated with the completeness of clinical response. Our biomarker has been independently studied and our findings replicated (Bareš et al., 2007). The cordance biomarker can be considered as a leading indicator or predictor of treatment outcome. As a non-invasive probe of brain physiology, it may detect early neurophysiologic changes associated with accelerated clinical response from eszopiclone.

Other research has reported that brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is reduced in many patients with MDD (Karege et al., 2002, 2005, Shimizu et al., 2003) and may rise during the course of treatment with antidepressant medication (e.g., Gonul et al., 2005; Yoshimura et al., 2007; Huang et al., 2007). BDNF-related neuroplasticity has been suggested as a mechanism by which medications can lead to mood improvement (Duman 2002; Manji et al., 2003). Sleep patterns have also been shown to have an impact on neuroplasticity (Taishi et al., 2001; cf. Benington & Frank, 2003). A simple acute phase-shift in sleep can impact BDNF levels (Sei 2003), suggesting that a link between sleep and symptomatic recovery from depression might operate via a BDNF mechanism and reflect changes in brain physiology.

While Krystal and colleagues (2007) previously reported that the beneficial clinical effects of 8 weeks of co-treatment did not diminish significantly in the two weeks following ESZ discontinuation, controlled studies have not examined outcomes in clinically-likely scenarios employing shorter co-treatment periods (e.g., 4 weeks, during which much of the acceleration occurs).

Based on these previous studies, this study will assess patients with MDD during treatment with an SSRI antidepressant, escitalopram (ESC), administered along with either ESZ or placebo (PBO), using (a) clinical symptom ratings, (b) serum levels of BDNF, (c) cognitive function, and (d) brain physiology with EEG.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90024
        • Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Outpatients with non-psychotic, unipolar Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).
  • A score of >14 on the HAM-D17.
  • Presence of insomnia, manifest by a total score of ≥ 4 combining all three sleep disturbance items on the HAM-D17 scale.
  • Age range: 18-64.
  • Patients with suicidal ideation are eligible only if the thoughts of death or of life not being worth living are not accompanied by a plan or intention for self-harm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is mentally or legally incapacitated, unable to give informed consent.
  • Patients who have a lifetime history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, MDD with psychotic features, or dementia (any etiology).
  • Patients with diagnostic uncertainty or ambiguity (e.g. rule-out pseudodementia of depression) will be excluded.
  • Patients with a current diagnosis of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or obsessive compulsive disorder.
  • Patients who have met diagnostic criteria for any current substance abuse disorder at any time in the 6 months prior to enrollment.
  • Insomnia symptoms that have not responded to a previous trial of a sedativehypnotic prescription medication.
  • Any history of seizures, brain surgery, skull fracture, significant head trauma, or previous abnormal EEG.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
Open label escitalopram plus eszopiclone for 8 weeks
escitalopram 10mg tabs QD and eszopiclone 3 mg tabs QD for 8 weeks
Other Names:
  • Lexapro
  • Lunesta
OTHER: 2
Escitalopram and eszopiclone for initial 4 weeks, then switch to escitalopram and placebo for final 4 weeks.
Escitalopram 10mg tabs QD for 8 weeks; Eszopiclone 3mg tabs QD for initial 4 weeks then placebo tabs QD for final 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Lexapro
  • Lunesta
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: 3
Escitalopram plus placebo for 8 weeks
Escitalopram 10mg tabs QD and placebo tabs QD for 8 weeks
Other Names:
  • Lexapro

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in cordance value
Time Frame: Visits 2-9
Visits 2-9
Change in cordance value
Time Frame: Visit 11
Visit 11
Change in cordance value
Time Frame: Visit 13
Visit 13

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Depression symptom severity
Time Frame: each visit
each visit
Serum BDNF
Time Frame: visits 2-9
visits 2-9
Cognitive testing
Time Frame: visits 2-7
visits 2-7
Serum BDNF
Time Frame: Visit 11
Visit 11
Serum BDNF
Time Frame: Visit 13
Visit 13
Cognitive testing
Time Frame: Visit 9
Visit 9
Cognitive testing
Time Frame: Visit 13
Visit 13

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ian A Cook, MD, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 5, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 20, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2010

Last Verified

July 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Insomnia

Clinical Trials on escitalopram and eszopiclone

3
Subscribe