Comparison of Small Bowel Lesions Associated With Celecoxib Versus Ibuprofen Plus Omeprazole

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Two-Week Study, Comparing Small Bowel Lesions Associated With Celecoxib (200 mg BID) vs. Ibuprofen (800 mg TID) Plus Omeprazole (20 mg QD)

To evaluate the small bowel lesion pattern associated with celecoxib alone versus ibuprofen plus omeprazole

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

408

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Jupiter, Florida, United States, 33458
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33173
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Rockford, Illinois, United States, 61107
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109-0362
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232-5280
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria:

  • Normal, healthy gastrointestinal tract (no small bowel mucosal breaks at Day 14 according to endoscopic data
  • No history of GI ulcers, bleeding or surgery, or complete or partial stenosis of the small intestine
  • Willing not to drink any alcohol during study period

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria:

  • Has established delayed gastric emptying or diabetic gastroparesis
  • Has active gastroesophageal reflux disease or requires anti-ulcer medications
  • Has taken aspirin or nonsteroidal antinflammatory drugs (ibuprofen, naproxen) more than 3 times per week within 2 weeks prior to the screening visit; aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis is restricted

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: A
200 mg oral capsule twice daily for 2 weeks
Active Comparator: C
ibuprofen 800 mg oral tablet three times daily plus omeprazole 20 mg oral capsule once daily for 2 weeks
Placebo Comparator: B
Matched placebo for 2 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of mucosal breaks in the small bowel for each subject
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Laboratory tests
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Vital signs
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Correlation of number of mucosal breaks in the small bowel for each patient with the result of the fecal calprotectin test
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Percentage of subjects with gastric mucosal breaks and the number of mucosal breaks
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Change from screening visit in hemoglobin and hematocrit
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Correlation of the number of gastric mucosal breaks with the number of small bowel mucosal breaks
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Physical examination
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Percentage of subjects with >=1 mucosal breaks
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Total number of small bowel lesions with or without hemorrhage
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Percentage of subjects with visible blood in the small bowel (without visualized lesions in the small bowel)
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Change in Patient General Questionnaire Visual Analog Scale from Day 16
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30
Change in Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment questionnaire from Day 16
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2003

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2004

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

March 21, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bowel Diseases, Inflammatory

Clinical Trials on Celecoxib

Subscribe