Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) and Mirror Training for Phantom Limb Pain

October 15, 2019 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Psychosocial and Visual Feedback Intervention for Phantom Limb Pain

The goal of this study is to test whether a combination of cognitive-behavior therapy and mirror training reduces phantom limb pain for veterans with amputations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial designed to test whether CBT plus mirror therapy (CBT+MT) is superior to supportive care (SC) for treatment of phantom limb pain (PLP) in amputees. The primary hypothesis is that CBT+ MT will lead to significantly greater reductions in PLP compared to SC. Secondary hypotheses will test whether CBT+MT also leads to significantly greater improvements in psychiatric symptoms, functioning, and quality of life than SC.

Eighty veterans from the San Diego VA Healthcare System (SDVAHS) will be recruited. All veterans will have a unilateral upper or lower limb amputation. All participants will complete an intake assessment prior to treatment randomization. The assessment will include measures of pain (Phantom Limb Pain Questionnaire, Descriptive Differential Scale, McGill Pain Questionnaire) psychiatric symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire, Posttraumatic Stress disorder Checklist), psychiatric diagnosis (Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview) and functioning (Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experiences Scale, Short Form-36). Participants will then randomized to either CBT+MT or SC. Participants will complete pain and mood assessments weekly during treatment, and be retested on the full assessment battery at the end of treatment and 12 and 24 weeks posttreatment.

The CBT+MT intervention will consist of 8 individual sessions of CBT, including psychoeducation, cognitive restructuring, relaxation training, and acceptance techniques. Participants in the CBT+MT condition will also learn to use a mirror apparatus to reduce PLP, and will receive a set of mirrors to use at home. The SC treatment will consist of the therapist meeting with the patient and using listening and reflection skills to discuss the patient's pain. The SC condition will have no pain education or skills training component.

Data analyses will use a repeated-measures ANOVA approach to test whether the two conditions differ on change in the primary measure (Phantom Limb Pain Questionnaire) as well as in other pain, psychiatric symptom, functioning and quality of life measures. Exploratory analyses will test whether patient variables and amputation characteristics predict treatment outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

59

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90822
        • VA Medical Center, Long Beach
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92161
        • VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
        • VA Medical Center, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (21or over)
  • unilateral amputation at or above wrist or ankle
  • phantom limb pain occurring at least weekly
  • living within 50 miles of a recruitment site (San Diego, San Francisco, or Long Beach VAs).
  • able to read and speak English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current alcohol or drug dependence
  • active psychosis
  • medical problems that preclude participation
  • current enrollment in behavioral pain management

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
Cognitive Behavior Therapy + mirror retraining
Cognitive Behavioral Pain Management treatment administered in 8 weeks of individual treatment, combined with training in use of a mirror device to reduce phantom limb pain.
Use of a mirror to produce an illusion of the missing limb. By attending to the reflected limb while moving the existing limb, the patient provides visual feedback that helps correct changes in the neural organization of the somatosensory cortex resulting from the amputation and contributing to the phantom limb pain
Other Names:
  • Mirror box training
Active Comparator: Arm 2
Supportive psychotherapy
Non-directive, emotion focused psychotherapy to facilitate coping with pain, delivered in weekly individual sessions.
Other Names:
  • Non-directive therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phantom Limb Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, each weekly treatment session (1-8), 12 weeks post treatment, 24 weeks posttreatment.
The primary outcome measure is the severity of phantom limb pain on a likert scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable)
Baseline, each weekly treatment session (1-8), 12 weeks post treatment, 24 weeks posttreatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Form-12 (SF-12)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks after baseline)
the Short Form-12 (SF-12) is a standardized self-report questionnaire that assesses mental and physical functioning. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) is scored on a scale from 0-100, with higher scores representing better reported health.
Baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks after baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John R. McQuaid, PhD MS BA, VA Medical Center, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Phantom Limb

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Mirror Retraining

3
Subscribe