- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00737061
Safety & Efficacy Study of the Adiana System for Women Who Desire Permanent Birth Control (Sterilization) (EASE)
A Multi-Center, Prospective Evaluation of the Adiana System for Transcervical Sterilization Using Electrothermal Energy in Women Aged 18-45 - The EASE Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants who demonstrated to be bilaterally occluded by hysterosalpingogram (HSG) evaluations are allowed to rely on the Adiana System for pregnancy prevention and enter the Wearing Period of follow-up.
Secondary endpoints inlcude safety of device placement procedure and safety of device wearing. The adverse events recorded during the course of the study are entered under adverse events.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New South Wales
-
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia, 2031
- Royal Hospital for Women
-
-
-
-
Nuevo Leon
-
Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico, 64460
- Hospital Universitario UANL
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85015
- Women's Health Research
-
-
California
-
Roseville, California, United States, 95661
- Kaiser Permanente
-
San Rafael, California, United States, 94903
- Kaiser Permanente
-
San Ramon, California, United States, 94583
- Reproductive Science Center
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Britain, Connecticut, United States, 06050
- Center for Fertility and Women's Health
-
-
Florida
-
Wellington, Florida, United States, 33414
- Institute for Women's Health and Body
-
-
Kansas
-
Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67226
- Center for Reproductive Medicine
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Newton, Massachusetts, United States, 02462
- Newton-Wellesley Hospital
-
-
Minnesota
-
Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55435
- Minnesota Gynecology and Surgery
-
-
Missouri
-
Chesterfield, Missouri, United States, 63017
- St. Luke's Hospital
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27713
- Duke Fertility Center
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
-
-
Texas
-
Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
- Baylor Research Institute
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53211
- Reproductive Specialty Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• Women aged 18 to 45
- Women who are seeking permanent contraception
- Women who are at risk of becoming pregnant
- Willing to risk becoming pregnant when relying on the Adiana device for contraception
- Relatively normal uterine cavity, uterine wall thickness, and uterine size as demonstrated by pelvic sonography
- Willing to keep a coital/menstrual log
- Have at least one confirmed pregnancy and one living child
- Monogamous relationship with a partner who has proven fertility
- Sexually active (at least 4 acts of intercourse per month)
- Willing to use alternate contraception (either a barrier method or oral contraceptive pills or other monthly, cyclic, hormonal birth control) during the three months following device placement prior to relying on the Adiana device for contraception
- Willing and able to maintain in regular contact with the investigator
- Women with regular, cyclical menses within 2 months prior to the device placement procedure
- Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women who are unsure of their desire to end their fertility
- Presence of gross genital infection, including sepsis
- Presence of chlamydia, gonorrhea or syphilis
- Presence of genital cancer (note: CIN1 is acceptable)
- Intra-uterine pathology which would prevent optimal access to the tubal ostium and intramural portion of the fallopian tube, such as large submucous fibroids or uterine adhesions
- History of chronic pelvic pain (present within the previous year), prior ectopic pregnancy, or fallopian tube surgery, or currently diagnosed severe dysmenorrhea, severe dyspareunia, endometriosis, adenomyosis, or pelvic inflammatory disease
- Women with unresolved tubal, ovarian or endometrial pathology
- Uterine neoplasia or precursors to neoplasia
- Dysfunctional uterine bleeding or intermenstrual bleeding within the prior three months
- Women who have not had at least two normal periods after the following events: irregular periods treated with oral contraceptives (or other monthly, cyclic, hormonal birth control) which have since been discontinued, IUD removal, childbirth, or termination of pregnancy
- Currently taking immunosuppressive medications including steroids
- Pregnancy
- Uterine perforation within the last 3 months
- Contraindications for surgical methods of sterilization
- Less than three months have passed since the last delivery or abortion
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Adiana Transcervical Sterilization System
Single arm treatment
|
Implantation of silicone matrix in fallopian tubes
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
1 Year Pregnancy Rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Pregnancy rate is defined as the cumulative percentage of pregnancies occuring within the time frame.
The primary endpoint for this study is the pregnancy prevention rate after one year of reliance on the Adiana System for pregnancy prevention.
The pregnancy rate was evaluated for all participants who underwent successful bilateral treatment and who had demonstrated tubal occlusion by hysterosalpingogram (HSG) at the end of the Waiting Period.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Device Placement Rate
Time Frame: After First Treatment Attempt
|
Defined as successful bilateral tubal access followed by successful bilateral RF treatment and matrix placement.
|
After First Treatment Attempt
|
Device Placement Rate
Time Frame: Including Second Treatment Attempt
|
Defined as successful bilateral tubal access followed by successful bilateral RF treatment and matrix placement.
|
Including Second Treatment Attempt
|
Patient Satisfaction With Placement Procedure
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Determined by verbal questions up to 48 hours post placement.
Endpoint reported represents minimum percentage of participants reporting somewhat satisfied, satisfied or very satisfied.
|
48 hours
|
Patient Satisfaction With Device Wearing
Time Frame: Waiting Period (1-Month, 2-Months, 3-Months)
|
Determined by verbal questions during periodic follow-up contacts.
Endpoint reported represents minimum percentage of subjects reporting somewhat satisfied, satisfied or very satisfied.
|
Waiting Period (1-Month, 2-Months, 3-Months)
|
Patient Satisfaction With Device Wearing
Time Frame: Wearing Period (3-Months, 6-Months, 9-Months, 12-Months)
|
Determined by verbal questions during periodic follow-up contacts.
Endpoint reported represents minimum percentage of subjects reporting somewhat satisfied, satisfied or very satisfied.
|
Wearing Period (3-Months, 6-Months, 9-Months, 12-Months)
|
Patient Comfort With Placement Procedure
Time Frame: Post-Procedure
|
Determined by verbal questions two hours following procedure or at discharge from facility, whichever came first.
Endpoint reported represents minimum percentage of participants reporting any discomfort or pain experienced during the procedure as the same as or less than they expected.
|
Post-Procedure
|
Patient Comfort With Placement Procedure
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Determined by verbal questions up to 48 hours post placement.
Endpoint reported represents minimum percentage of participants reporting any discomfort or pain experienced in first 48 hours following procedure as the same as they expected, less than they expected or no pain.
|
48 hours
|
Patient Comfort With Device Wearing
Time Frame: Waiting Period (1-Month, 2-Months, 3-Months)
|
Determined by verbal questions during periodic follow-up contacts.
Endpoint represents minimum percentage of subjects reporting good, very good or excellent comfort.
|
Waiting Period (1-Month, 2-Months, 3-Months)
|
Patient Comfort With Device Wearing
Time Frame: Wearing Period (3-Months, 6-Months, 9-Months, 12-Months)
|
Determined by verbal questions during periodic follow-up contacts.
Endpoint represents minimum percentage of subjects reporting good, very good or excellent comfort.
|
Wearing Period (3-Months, 6-Months, 9-Months, 12-Months)
|
3 Year Pregnancy Rate
Time Frame: 3 years
|
Pregnancy rate is defined as the cumulative percentage of pregnancies occuring within the time frame.
The pregnancy rate was evaluated for all participants who underwent successful bilateral treatment and who had demonstrated tubal occlusion by hysterosalpingogram (HSG) at the end of the Waiting Period who have been followed for up to 3 years.
|
3 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Edward Evantash, MD, Hologic, Inc.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- P0071
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Reproductive Sterilization
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD); University... and other collaboratorsCompletedContraception | Contraception Behavior | Women's Health | Reproductive Behavior | Tubal SterilizationUnited States
-
Shepherd Medical CompanyUnknown
-
Bartin State HospitalCompletedSterilization, Tubal | SalpingectomyTurkey
-
EngenderHealthUnited States Agency for International Development (USAID); Tanzania Ministry... and other collaboratorsCompletedSterilization, TubalTanzania
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedTubal SterilizationUnited States
-
Inova Health Care ServicesRecruitingPregnancy Related | Permanent SterilizationUnited States
-
Jani JacquesRecruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesTerminated
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityCompleted
-
Göteborg UniversityUmeå UniversityActive, not recruitingLaparoscopy | Ovarian Reserve | Salpingectomy | Sterilization TubalSweden
Clinical Trials on Adiana Transcervical Sterilization System
-
Ain Shams UniversityNot yet recruitingDisinfectant Causing Toxic Effect
-
University of New MexicoBayer; Society of Family PlanningCompletedContraception | Inhalation of Nitrous OxideUnited States
-
Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat UniversityCompletedSterilization, Tubal | Visual Analog Pain Scale
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkThe Novo Nordic FoundationCompletedOropharynx Cancer | Tonsil Cancer | Tonsil Hypertrophy | Tonsil Neoplasm | Tonsil Lymphoma | Base of Tongue Carcinoma | Oropharynx Neoplasm | Base of Tongue TumorDenmark
-
Sohag UniversityRecruitingOphthalmopathyEgypt
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkThe Novo Nordic FoundationRecruitingOropharynx Cancer | Tonsil Cancer | Tonsil Hypertrophy | Base of the Tongue Tumor | Tonsil Ulcer | Tonsil Neoplasm | Tonsil Lymphoma | Base of Tongue CarcinomaDenmark
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterAmerican Cancer Society, Inc.CompletedOropharynx Cancer | Tonsil Cancer | Human Papillomavirus Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Base of Tongue CarcinomaUnited States
-
GynesonicsRecruitingUterine FibroidGermany, Switzerland, United Kingdom