Outpatient Ultrasound for the Diagnostic Work-up of Oropharynx Cancer

May 2, 2023 updated by: Martin Garset-Zamani, MD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Surgeon-performed Outpatient Transoral and Transcervical Ultrasound for the Diagnostic Work-up of Oropharynx Cancer: a Feasibility Study

The aim of the study was to examine the detection rate and tumor size evaluation in patients with suspected oropharynx cancer using a new technique with transoral ultrasound of the oropharynx. The new technique was compared to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The study investigators included patients referred to a tertiary head & neck cancer center in Copenhagen, Denmark, with suspicion of oropharynx cancer. Patients supplied written informed consent and were included and ultrasound scanned with local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic. Blinded assessment of MRI's was performed for tumor detection and compared to ultrasound with the reference standard being histopathology biopsy results.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

An explorative diagnostic study was performed at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Denmark from October 1st, 2021, to April 30th, 2022. The study investigators invited adult patients from the outpatient cancer clinic referred with a suspicion of oropharynx cancer to participate in the study. At the study investigators' center, all head & neck cancer patients receive diagnostic work-up which includes clinical exam, flexible laryngoscopy with narrow-band imaging, surgeon-performed neck ultrasound and biopsy and/or cytology with same-day results. Patients were enrolled after verbal and written consent and were offered an ultrasound examination of the oropharynx as an addition to the standard diagnostic workup in the outpatient clinic. All included patients also received an MRI of the head and neck. Clinical data including age, sex, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, date of MRI scan, and histopathology results were obtained from medical charts after inclusion.

Interventions included transoral ultrasound of the tonsils and base of tongue, conducted with BK5000 ultrasound machines using the X18L5s "hockey stick" transducer. Transcervical ultrasound was also performed in patients where a tongue base cancer was most likely. Standard linear neck transducers (X18L5) or a curved 9C2 transducer was used. The tonsils and tongue base were scanned in two planes if possible, and doppler flow was recorded as well. Ultrasound images were stored as video clips.

The detection of tumors with ultrasound was recorded as "positive" if a well-defined tumor was seen that was clearly visualized compared to the contralateral side. A "negative" result was given if no tumors were suspected on either side. An "inconclusive" result was given if a tumor was not clear, but there was suspicious asymmetry visualized. The anatomical sub-location of tumors were stratified into right and left tonsil, tongue base, overlapping tonsil and tongue base, and "other" sub-locations. "Other" sub-locations included the soft palate, uvula, oropharynx posterior wall, vallecula, anterior pharyngeal arch and posterior pharyngeal arch.

MRI was used as the reference test. An expert neuroradiologist blinded to ultrasound results and histopathology rated all tests for tumor detection in the oropharynx and tumor size in detected tumors.

Statistical analysis:

Tumor detection of oropharynx ultrasound and MRI will be compared using the histopathologic diagnosis (cancer or benign) as reference standard to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive- and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV).

Inconclusive tests will be analyzed as a positive result due to the clinical consequences often leading to diagnostic tonsillectomy.

McNemar's test for differences between sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV between ultrasound and MRI will be calculated.

The greatest tumor diameter will be compared between ultrasound and MRI using scatter plots and the Pearson's R correlation coefficient. Tumor volumes calculated using the formula for an ellipse: π/6 * craniocaudal * anteroposterior * mediolateral will be compared. Statistical analysis will be performed using R software version 4.2.2.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery & Audiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria (any of the following):

  • Visible and/or palpable tumor or asymmetry of the tonsils, tongue base or oropharynx.
  • Subjective symptoms of oropharynx cancer including dysphagia, odynophagia and/or referred otalgia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to understand Danish or English.
  • Unable to provide written informed consent.
  • Age younger than 18 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Oropharynx Ultrasound
Transoral and transcervical ultrasound of the oropharynx, including the tonsils and tongue base.
Under local anesthetic with xylocaine spray in the oropharynx, the tonsils and tongue base are scanned with small-footprint, high-frequency ultrasound transducers (such as the 18XL5s hockey-stick from BK Medical)
The tongue base and tonsils are scanned externally via the neck, where a (preferably low-frequency) transducer is placed onto the skin above the hyoid bone to visualize the tongue base. The tonsils are visualized adjacent to the tongue base on either side and are located deep to the submandibular glands in a oblique coronal plane.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients with oropharynx cancer detected by ultrasound compared to MRI
Time Frame: Within two weeks.
Patients with cancer (histopathology verified) correctly detected by a positive ultrasound or MRI test result.
Within two weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Greatest tumor diameter compared between ultrasound and MRI.
Time Frame: 1 day
Greatest tumor diameter measured in millimeters.
1 day
Proportion of patients without oropharynx cancer detected by ultrasound compared to MRI
Time Frame: Within three months.
Patients with benign tonsillar asymmetry (histopathology verified) correctly detected by a negative ultrasound or MRI test result.
Within three months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oropharynx Cancer

Clinical Trials on Transoral ultrasound

3
Subscribe