- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00790933
An Open-label Study of Vedolizumab (MLN0002) in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease (GEMINI LTS)
A Phase 3, Open-label Study to Determine the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Vedolizumab (MLN0002) in Subjects With Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The drug being tested in this study is called vedolizumab. Vedolizumab is being tested to treat people who have ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. This study will determine the safety profile of long-term vedolizumab treatment.
The study enrolled 2243 patients. Participants who received either placebo or vedolizumab 300 mg IV infusion every 4 or 8 weeks in previous vedolizumab studies received:
• Vedolizumab 300 mg
All participants received vedolizumab intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for approximately up to 510 weeks.
This multicenter trial is being conducted worldwide. The overall time to participate in this study was up to October 2017 until vedolizumab was available in the country in which the participant resided, or until participant withdrawal, whichever came first. Participants made multiple visits to the clinic up to 16 weeks after receiving their last dose of vedolizumab and were being followed up for 2-years during which a safety questionnaire was administered by telephone for follow-up assessments.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
South Australia
-
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
-
-
-
-
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
-
-
-
-
Alberta
-
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G2X8
-
-
Saskatchewan
-
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N 0W8
-
-
-
-
-
Praha, Czechia, 170 04
-
-
-
-
Saint
-
Halle, Saint, Germany, 6097
-
-
-
-
-
Szekszard, Hungary, 7100
-
-
-
-
-
Tel Aviv, Israel, 64239
-
-
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 130-702
-
-
-
-
-
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 59100
-
-
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92114
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
-
-
Colorado
-
Lafayette, Colorado, United States, 80026
-
Littleton, Colorado, United States, 80120
-
Thornton, Colorado, United States, 80229
-
-
Connecticut
-
Hamden, Connecticut, United States, 06518
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32256
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33172
-
Winter Park, Florida, United States, 32789
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30024
-
Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
-
Macon, Georgia, United States, 31201
-
-
Kansas
-
Topeka, Kansas, United States, 66606
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202
-
-
Louisiana
-
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States, 70809
-
-
Maryland
-
Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States, 20815
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
-
Troy, Michigan, United States, 48098
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55904
-
-
New York
-
Cheektowaga, New York, United States, 10029
-
New York, New York, United States, 10029
-
-
North Carolina
-
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
-
Elkin, North Carolina, United States, 28621
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97225
-
-
Tennessee
-
Germantown, Tennessee, United States, 38138
-
-
Texas
-
San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
-
Tyler, Texas, United States, 75701
-
-
Virginia
-
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Previous treatment in Study C13004 (NCT00619489), Study C13006 (NCT00783718), Study C13007 (NCT00783692), or Study C13011 (NCT01224171) that, in the opinion of the investigator, was well tolerated OR b. Moderate to severe Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis which has not been previously treated with vedolizumab (MLN0002)
- May be receiving a therapeutic dose of conventional therapies for Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis as defined by the protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Development of any new, unstable, or uncontrolled disease
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Vedolizumab 300 mg
Vedolizumab 300 mg, 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks, starting at Week 0 for approximately up to 510 weeks.
|
Vedolizumab intravenous infusion
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug in this study through 16 weeks after the last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 8.5 years)
|
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug.
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.
|
From first dose of study drug in this study through 16 weeks after the last dose of study drug (Up to approximately 8.5 years)
|
|
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Safety Laboratory Findings
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug in this study through 16 weeks after the last dose of study drug (Up to 8.5 years)
|
A laboratory value was considered a marked abnormality if it met the predefined criteria or parameters and the on-treatment value was more extreme than the Baseline value for the following parameters: hemoglobin <= 70 g/L, absolute lymphocyte count <0.5 X 10^9/L, leukocytes <2.0 X 10^9/L (absolute value), platelets <75.0 X 10^9/L, absolute neutrophil Count <1.0 X 10^9/L, prothrombin time >1.25 x upper limit of normal (ULN), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3.0 x ULN, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3.0 x ULN, bilirubin >2.0 x ULN, amylase >2.0 x ULN, lipase >2.0 x ULN.
|
From first dose of study drug in this study through 16 weeks after the last dose of study drug (Up to 8.5 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Clinically Significant Mean Change Over Time in Vital Sign Measurements
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug in this study through 16 weeks after the last dose of study drug (Up to 8.5 years)
|
Vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and temperature) measurements were collected throughout the study.
Any clinically significant mean change in vital signs over time as assessed by the investigator was reported as a TEAE.
|
From first dose of study drug in this study through 16 weeks after the last dose of study drug (Up to 8.5 years)
|
|
Number of Participants With at Least One Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug in this study through 16 weeks after the last dose of study drug (Up to 8.5 years)
|
A standard 12-lead ECG was performed.
Any ECGs assessed by the investigator to be clinically significant were reported as TEAEs.
|
From first dose of study drug in this study through 16 weeks after the last dose of study drug (Up to 8.5 years)
|
|
Time to Major Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) - Related Events
Time Frame: Baseline (Prior to first dose of study drug in C13008) up to end of study (approximately up to 8.5 years)
|
IBD-related events included hospitalizations, surgeries, or procedures due to ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.
|
Baseline (Prior to first dose of study drug in C13008) up to end of study (approximately up to 8.5 years)
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Scores at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 28
|
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items).
Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best).
A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 28
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Scores at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 52
|
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items).
Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best).
A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Scores at Week 76
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 76
|
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items).
Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best).
A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 76
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Scores at Week 100
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 100
|
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items).
Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best).
A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 100
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Scores at Week 124
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 124
|
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items).
Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best).
A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 124
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Scores at Week 148
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 148
|
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items).
Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best).
A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 148
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Scores at Week 172
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 172
|
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items).
Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best).
A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 172
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Scores at Week 196
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 196
|
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items).
Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best).
A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 196
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Scores at Week 248
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 248
|
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items).
Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best).
A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 248
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Scores at Week 300
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 300
|
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items).
Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best).
A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 300
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Scores at Week 352
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 352
|
The IBDQ is an instrument used to assess quality of life in adult participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
It includes 32 questions on 4 domains of Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQOL): Bowel Systems (10 items), Emotional Function (12 items), Social Function (5 items), and Systemic Function (5 items).
Participants are asked to recall symptoms and quality of life from the last 2 weeks and rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1=worst to 7=best).
A total IBDQ score is calculated by summing the scores from each domain; the total IBDQ score ranges from 32 to 224, with lower scores reflecting worse HRQOL.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 352
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Scores at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 28
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Scores at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 28
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 28
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 52
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Score at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 52
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component at Week 76
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 76
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Score at Week 76
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 76
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score at Week 100
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 100
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 100
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Score at Week 100
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 100
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 100
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Scores at Week 124
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 124
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 124
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Scores at Week 124
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 124
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 124
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score at Week 148
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 148
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 8 scales, the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 148
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Score at Week 148
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 148
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 148
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Scores at Week 172
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 172
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 172
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Scores at Week 172
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 172
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 172
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score at Week 196
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 196
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 196
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Score at Week 196
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 196
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 196
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score at Week 248
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 248
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 248
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Score at Week 248
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 248
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 248
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score at Week 300
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 300
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health), the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 300
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Score at Week 300
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 300
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 300
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score at Week 352
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 352
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 8 scales, the physical component summary (PCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 352
|
|
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Mental Component Score at Week 352
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 352
|
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a questionnaire that evaluates a person's HRQOL.
SF-36 includes 36 questions related to 8 health dimensions: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations due to physical health problems), bodily pain, general health, vitality (energy/fatigue), social functioning, role-emotional (role limitations due to emotional problems), and mental health.
Based on these 4 scales (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health), the mental component summary (MCS) score is generated which ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 352
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Composite Score at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 28
|
EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD).
It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme.
A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL.
A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores.
The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15.
A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 28
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 28
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 28
|
EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme.
The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health.
An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 28
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Composite Score at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 52
|
EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD).
It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme.
A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL.
A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores.
The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15.
A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 52
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 52
|
EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme.
The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health.
An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 52
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Composite Score at Week 76
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 76
|
EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD).
It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme.
A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL.
A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores.
The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15.
A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 76
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 76
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 76
|
EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme.
The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health.
An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 76
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Composite Score at Week 100
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 100
|
EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD).
It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme.
A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL.
A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores.
The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15.
A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 100
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 100
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 100
|
EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme.
The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health.
An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 100
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Composite Score at Week 124
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 124
|
EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD).
It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme.
A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL.
A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores.
The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15.
A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 124
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 124
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 124
|
EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme.
The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health.
An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 124
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Composite Score at Week 148
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 148
|
EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD).
It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme.
A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL.
A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores.
The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15.
A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 148
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 148
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 148
|
EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme.
The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health.
An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 148
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Composite Score at Week 172
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 172
|
EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD).
It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme.
A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL.
A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores.
The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15.
A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 172
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 172
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 172
|
EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme.
The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health.
An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 172
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Composite Score at Week 196
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 196
|
EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD).
It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme.
A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL.
A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores.
The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15.
A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 196
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 196
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 196
|
EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme.
The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health.
An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 196
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Composite Score at Week 248
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 248
|
EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD).
It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme.
A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL.
A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores.
The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15.
A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 248
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 248
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 248
|
EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme.
The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health.
An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 248
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Composite Score at Week 300
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 300
|
EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD).
It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme.
A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL.
A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores.
The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15.
A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 300
|
|
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5D Health States (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 300
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 300
|
EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme.
The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health.
An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 300
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Composite Score at Week 352
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 352
|
EQ-5D health states questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general health related quality of life (HRQOL) in participants with infectious bowel disease (IBD).
It considers five attributes of quality of life evaluation: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1=none, 2=moderate or 3=extreme.
A composite EQ-5D score can be calculated from the individual scores to assess overall HRQOL.
A composite EQ-5D score is calculated as a sum of all 5 sub-scores.
The total sub-score ranges from 5 to 15.
A decrease of ≥0.3 points in the composite EQ-5D score represents improvement in quality of life of participants.
A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 352
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Health States Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 352
Time Frame: Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 352
|
EQ-5D questionnaire is an instrument used to measure general HRQOL in participants with IBD.
Each dimension has three possible levels: 1 = none, 2 = moderate or 3 = extreme.
The EQ-5D VAS score is a self-assigned rating of overall health using a 20-cm visual, vertical scale, with a score of 0 as the worst and 100 as the best possible health.
An increase of ≥7 points in the EQ-5D VAS score represents a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life for participants.
A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline (prior to first dose of study drug in C13008; for rollover participants this was the last assessment from the previous study) and Week 352
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Colombel JF, Sands BE, Rutgeerts P, Sandborn W, Danese S, D'Haens G, Panaccione R, Loftus EV Jr, Sankoh S, Fox I, Parikh A, Milch C, Abhyankar B, Feagan BG. The safety of vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Gut. 2017 May;66(5):839-851. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-311079. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
- Dulai PS, Feagan BG, Sands BE, Chen J, Lasch K, Lirio RA. Prognostic Value of Fecal Calprotectin to Inform Treat-to-Target Monitoring in Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb;21(2):456-466.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.027. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
- Feagan BG, Schreiber S, Wolf DC, Axler JL, Kaviya A, James A, Curtis RI, Geransar P, Stallmach A, Ehehalt R, Bokemeyer B, Khalid JM, O'Byrne S. Sustained Clinical Remission With Vedolizumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019 May 4;25(6):1028-1035. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy323.
- Arijs I, De Hertogh G, Lemmens B, Van Lommel L, de Bruyn M, Vanhove W, Cleynen I, Machiels K, Ferrante M, Schuit F, Van Assche G, Rutgeerts P, Vermeire S. Effect of vedolizumab (anti-alpha4beta7-integrin) therapy on histological healing and mucosal gene expression in patients with UC. Gut. 2018 Jan;67(1):43-52. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312293. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
- Wyant T, Yang L, Lirio RA, Rosario M. Vedolizumab Immunogenicity With Long-Term or Interrupted Treatment of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Sep;61(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1877. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
- Loftus EV Jr, Feagan BG, Panaccione R, Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Sands BE, Danese S, D'Haens G, Rubin DT, Shafran I, Parfionovas A, Rogers R, Lirio RA, Vermeire S. Long-term safety of vedolizumab for inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Oct;52(8):1353-1365. doi: 10.1111/apt.16060. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- C13008
- 2008-002784-14 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)
- NMRR-08-1040-2195 (REGISTRY: NMRR)
- CTRI/2009/091/000138 (REGISTRY: CTRI)
- 10/H1102/12 (REGISTRY: NRES)
- NL25209.096.08 (REGISTRY: CCMO)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Crohn's Disease
-
ProgenaBiomeWithdrawnCrohn Disease | Crohn Colitis | Crohn's Ileocolitis | Crohn's Gastritis | Crohn's Jejunitis | Crohn's Duodenitis | Crohn's Esophagitis | Crohn's | Crohn Disease of Ileum | Crohn Ileitis | Crohn's Disease Relapse | Crohns Disease Aggravated | Crohn Disease in Remission | Crohn's Disease of PylorusUnited States
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityNot yet recruitingCrohn's Disease Aggravated | Crohn's Disease in Remission
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); American...RecruitingInflammatory Bowel Diseases | Crohn Disease | Crohn Colitis | Crohn's Ileocolitis | Crohn's Gastritis | Crohn's Jejunitis | Crohn's Duodenitis | Crohn's EsophagitisUnited States
-
Tanabe Pharma CorporationCompleted
-
Richard Burt, MDTerminatedCROHN'S DISEASEUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRecruitingCrohn's Ileocolitis | Crohn's Gastritis | Crohn's Jejunitis | Crohn's Duodenitis | Crohn's Esophagitis | Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) | Crohn's Colitis | Indeterminate Colitis | Ulcerative Colitis (UC) | Ulcerative Proctitis | Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis | Crohn's Disease Colon | IBD-unclassified (IBD-U)United States
-
BiocadRecruiting
-
AbbVieActive, not recruitingCrohn's Disease (CD)United States, Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Brazil, Switzerland, Argentina, Chile, Aus... and more
-
Agomab Spain S.L.U.CompletedFibrostenotic Crohn's DiseaseBelgium
-
Kate Farms IncUniversity of MinnesotaCompleted
Clinical Trials on Vedolizumab
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityCompletedUlcerative Colitis (UC)China
-
AryoGen Pharmed Co.CompletedInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) | Crohn Disease (CD) | Ulcerative Colitis (UC)Iran
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruiting
-
TakedaRecruitingCrohn's Disease | Ulcerative ColitisUnited States
-
TakedaCompleted
-
Universita degli Studi di GenovaWithdrawn
-
TakedaWithdrawnCrohn's Disease | Ulcerative Colitis
-
Mayo ClinicWithdrawnUlcerative Colitis | Dietary ModificationUnited States
-
TakedaCompletedCrohn's Disease | Colitis, UlcerativeUnited States, Belgium, Israel, Spain, Korea, Republic of, Taiwan, Netherlands, Australia, Denmark, Hungary, Italy, Russian Federation, Brazil, Croatia, Germany, Serbia, Bulgaria, Canada, Poland, Slovakia, Ukraine, Czechia, Argentina, Turke... and more