A Controlled Trial of Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors Added to Stimulant Medication in Youth With Severe Mood Dysregulation

A Controlled Trial of Citalopram Added to Methylphenidate in Youth With Severe Mood Dysregulation

Severe mood dysregulation (SMD) is a very common syndrome in children. Its symptoms include very severe irritability, including persistent anger and frequent outbursts, as well as distractibility, hyperactivity, and other symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Many children with SMD receive the diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) in the community, although they do not have clear manic episodes (with symptoms such as extreme happiness and decreased need for sleep). Because SMD has not been studied in depth, we do not know which medications are most helpful to those with SMD. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the stimulant medication methylphenidate (MPH, more commonly known as Ritalin ) when combined (or not combined) with the antidepressant citalopram (Celexa ) in treating symptoms of SMD in children and adolescents. This study will provide information about how to treat SMD in youth.

This study will include approximately 80 patients between 7 and 17 years of age with SMD. The patient s symptoms must have started before age 12.

The study will consist of four phases carried out over 4 to 5 months. During Phase 1, the patient will undergo blood and urine tests, and will gradually taper off his or her medication. The duration of this phase depends on the patient s medication before starting the study. In Phase 2, the patient remains off all medication for 1 week. In Phase 3, the patient will be treated with MPH for 2 weeks, and then will be randomly assigned to receive either MPH plus citalopram or MPH plus a placebo for a further 8 weeks. In Phase 4, the researchers will evaluate the effectiveness of the medications taken, and begin an open treatment phase using medications that they deem appropriate for that patient (this may include MPH with citalopram and/or other medication combinations).

Most patients will be admitted to the Pediatric Behavioral Health Unit at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center during the medication withdrawal part of the study (Phases 1 and 2). From Phase 3 on, a patient may participate as an inpatient, outpatient, or in day treatment, depending on what is in his or her best interests.

...

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective: To test the efficacy of citalopram plus methylphenidate vs. placebo plus methylphenidate in decreasing irritability in youth with severe mood dysregulation.

Study population: Youth ages 7-17 with severe mood dysregulation (SMD). SMD is characterized by nonepisodic, impairing irritability (defined as increased reactivity to negative emotional stimuli at least 3 times/week and angry or sad mood, most days, most of the time, noticeable to others) and hyperarousal (three of: distractibility, intrusiveness, pressured speech, racing thoughts, agitation, insomnia), with onset before age 12. Many of these children receive the diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD) in the community, although they do not meet DSM-IV criteria for BD because of the lack of distinct manic episodes.

Design: Medication withdrawal, followed by a 5-week dose stabilization phase of methylphenidate and an 8-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment trial of citalopram plus methylphenidate vs. placebo plus methylphenidate. There will also be optional open treatment at the end, so that all patients have the opportunity to have a total of up to 10 weeks of citalopram plus methylphenidate. The target dose of citalopram will be 20-40 mg/day.

Outcome measures: The primary outcome measures will be the Aberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability subscale and the CGI-I.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:

    1. Ages 7-17
    2. Abnormal mood (specifically, anger, sadness, and/or irritability), present at least half of the day most days, and of sufficient severity to be noticeable by people in the child s environment (e.g. parents, teachers, peers).
    3. Hyperarousal, as defined by at least three of the following symptoms: insomnia, agitation, distractibility, racing thoughts or flight of ideas, pressured speech, intrusiveness
    4. Compared to his/her peers, the child exhibits markedly increased reactivity to negative emotional stimuli that is manifest verbally and/or behaviorally. For example, the child responds to frustration with extended temper tantrums (inappropriate for age and/or precipitating event), verbal rages, and/or aggression toward people or property. Such events occur, on average, at least three times a week
    5. Criteria 2, 3, and 4 are currently present and have been present for at least 12 months without any symptom-free periods exceeding two months.
    6. The onset of symptoms must be prior to age 12 years.
    7. The symptoms are severe in at least one setting (e.g. violent outbursts, extreme verbal abuse, assaultiveness at home, school, or with peers). In addition, there are at least mild symptoms (distractibility, intrusiveness) in a second setting.
    8. Currently in treatment with a psychiatrist for the symptoms.
    9. The child is failing his/her treatment. To meet this criterion:

      i.The child s current CGAS score must be less than or equal to 60.

      ii.The child s psychiatrist/treater must agree that the child s response to his/her current treatment is no more than minimal. According to this criterion, it would be clinically appropriate to change the child s current treatment.

      iii.On the basis of record review and interviews with child and parent, the research team agrees that the child s response to his/her current treatment is no more than minimal.

      iv.The child has a score of greater than 12 on the irritability subscale of the Aberrant Behavior Checklist.

      EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

    1. As assessed in the mania section of the K-SADS-PL, the individual exhibits any of these cardinal bipolar symptoms in distinct periods lasting more than 1 day, and therefore meets criteria for bipolar disorder not otherwise specified:

      i) Elevated or expansive mood

      ii) Grandiosity or inflated self-esteem

      iii) Decreased need for sleep

      iv) Increase in goal-directed activity (this can result in the excessive involvement in pleasurable activities that have a high potential for painful consequences)

    2. Meets criteria for schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective illness, more than mild PDD, or PTSD.
    3. Meets criteria for substance use disorder in the three months prior to randomization.
    4. IQ less than 70
    5. The symptoms are due to the direct physiological effects of a drug of abuse, or to a general medical or neurological condition.
    6. Currently pregnant or lactating, or sexually active without using a barrier method of contraception.
    7. Failed an adequate trial (defined as four weeks of consecutive treatment at the minimally effective) or severe ill effects while on citalopram (at least 20 mg) or escitalopram (at least 10 mg).
    8. Hypersensitivity or severe adverse reaction to methylphenidate
    9. A history of serious adverse reactions (psychosis, severely increased activation compared to baseline) to methylphenidate or amphetamines.
    10. Any chronic medical condition that requires medications that are contraindicated with SSRIs or methylphenidate, or any serious chronic or unstable medical disorder.
    11. Medical contraindications to treatment with SSRI or stimulant (e.g. liver, seizure, renal, platelet disorder).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Add-on citalopram following optimized methylphenidate
After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram or placebo
After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram or placebo
Placebo Comparator: Add-on placebo after optimized methylphenidate
After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram or placebo
After optimized treatment with methylphenidate, those who meet threshold for chronic irritability are randomized to add-on citalopram or placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants That "Much Improved" (Score of 2) in, or "Completely Recovered" (Score of 1) From Their Irritability Severity, as Measured With the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I).
Time Frame: Collected weekly during the 8-week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.

A measure of change of irritability severity taking the baseline before randomization as a reference. Scores range 1 to 8, in which 1=Completely recovered,... 5=Unchanged,... 8=Much worse.

Percentage of participants who responded are based on an estimation and might not match exactly with discrete numbers of participants based on the denominator.

Collected weekly during the 8-week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Irritability Severity at 8th Week of Trial.
Time Frame: Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.
Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S): A measure of severity of irritability scale (from 1=Normal, not at all ill to 7=Among the most extremely ill patients).
Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.
Functional Impairment at 8th Week of Trial
Time Frame: Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.
Difference in functional impairment at 8th week of trial as measured with Children's Global Impression Scale (CGAS) with scores ranging from 1=Most impaired to 100=Not impaired at all.
Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.
Depressive Symptoms at 8th Week of Trial
Time Frame: Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.
Difference in depressive symptoms at 8th week of trial as measured with Children's Depression Rating Scale (CDRS) with scores ranging 17-113, where scores >40 are considered over the clinical threshold, and scores <28 are considered within the healthy range.
Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.
Anxiety Symptoms at 8th Week of Trial
Time Frame: Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.
Difference in anxiety symptoms at 8th week of trial as measured with the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) with scores ranging 0-25. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Collected weekly during the 8th week trial. The 8th-week outcome is reported.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Argyris Stringaris, M.D., National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 17, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 19, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Clinical Trials on Add-on citalopram following optimized methylphenidate

Subscribe