The International Collaborative Exfoliation Syndrome Treatment Study

December 5, 2008 updated by: The New York Eye & Ear Infirmary

Purpose: To determine the efficacy of treatment with latanoprost in combination with pilocarpine versus timolol or timolol/dorzolamide fixed combination (Timoptic or Cosopt) in eyes with XFS and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP).

Methods: This is a randomized, open-label study to test the hypothesis that improving both pressure-dependent and pressure-independent aqueous outflow and minimizing iridolenticular friction will interfere with the progression of XFS, allow improvement in trabecular function, and be more effective over time than simply reducing aqueous formation. Randomization was performed across the centers, per patient rather than per eye to avoid any crossover effect caused by aqueous suppressants. Group I was treated with latanoprost and pilocarpine, both in the evening, and Group II with Timolol or Cosopt b.i.d. Only one eye per patient was randomized. Patients were followed for 2 years with assessment of IOP, visual field progression, tonographic outflow coefficient and trabecular pigmentation at the 6:00 and 12:00 position.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose: To compare the effect of treatment with latanoprost plus pilocarpine vs timolol or fixed combination timolol/dorzolamide (T/D) in eyes with exfoliation syndrome (XFS) and elevated IOP.

Methods: A randomized, prospective, international, 12-center, two-year, open-label clinical trial was conducted. XFS patients aged 50-80 years with untreated IOP ≥22 mmHg and open angles with or without mild to moderate glaucomatous damage were included. One eligible eye per patient was randomly assigned to latanoprost and pilocarpine qhs to increase aqueous outflow and inhibit pupillary movement (group I), or to decrease aqueous production with timolol or T/D bid as needed for IOP control (group II). IOP, tonographic outflow facility, and trabecular pigmentation were measured every 6 months.

Results: 277 (146 male) patients (mean age 69.1±6.8 yr, range 50-80 yr)' were enrolled between October 2000 and July 2003. XFS was unilateral in 118 (42.6%) and bilateral in 159 (57.4%) patients. Baseline TM pigmentation at the 6:00 angle was significantly associated with IOP (p=0.01). IOP reduction was 1.3 mmHg greater in Group I (n=145) than in Group II (n=132) (p=0.0003). Mean increase in outflow facility in Group I was 0.005 µl/mmHg/min vs 0 μl/mmHg/min in Group II (p<0.001). TM pigmentation at the 6:00 position at 24 months decreased from baseline more frequently in Group I than in Group II [34(26%) vs 20(16%)] and increased from baseline more frequently in Group II than in Group I [31(25%) vs 24(18%)].

Conclusions: Subjects in Group I had lower IOP, improved outflow facility and decreased TM pigmentation. Initial therapy to increase aqueous outflow and interfere with dispersion of exfoliation material and iris pigment by inhibiting pupillary movement is preferable to reducing aqueous secretion, which may be deleterious as primary treatment in this disorder.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

277

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
        • New York Eye and Ear Infirmary

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Exfoliation syndrome in one or both eyes. Exfoliation material must be present on the anterior lens surface for diagnosis.
  2. Untreated IOP greater than or equal to 22 mmHg in one or both eyes with or without mild to moderate glaucomatous damage and who, in the judgment of the investigator, can be safely washed off from current medical therapy.
  3. Age 50-80 years
  4. Open angles by gonioscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age over 80 years
  2. Best corrected visual acuity less than 20/30
  3. Untreated IOP greater than 35 mmHg
  4. Currently taking systemic beta-blockers
  5. Glaucomatous damage sufficiently severe to prevent washout in the opinion of the examiner or visual field defect within 10 degrees of fixation
  6. Glaucoma other than exfoliation syndrome
  7. Absence of exfoliation material on the lens surface in the eye to be treated
  8. Known allergy or sensitivity to any of the study medications
  9. Ocular pathology that may interfere with the ability to obtain tonography, visual fields, or accurate IOP readings
  10. Angle-closure glaucoma
  11. Diabetic retinopathy
  12. Previous intraocular or laser surgery.
  13. Unwilling or unable to give consent
  14. Pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: 1
Latanoprost in combination with Pilocarpine
Timolol 0.5% bid or Cosopt bid Latanoprost 0.005% qhs Pilocarpine 2%
Other Names:
  • Cosopt
  • Timolol
NO_INTERVENTION: 2
Timolol or Cosopt
Timolol 0.5% bid or Cosopt bid Latanoprost 0.005% qhs Pilocarpine 2%
Other Names:
  • Cosopt
  • Timolol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Latanoprost combined with pilocarpine (L-PILO) should be as effective as timolol or Cosopt in lowering IOP
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Ritch, MD, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2000

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2007

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 8, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 8, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2008

Last Verified

December 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ocular Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Latanoprost with Pilocarpine vs Timolol or Cosopt

3
Subscribe