Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 and Biphasic Human Insulin 30 on Blood Sugar Control in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

February 13, 2015 updated by: Novo Nordisk A/S

Comparison of the Efficacy on Glycaemic Control and Safety Profile of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 and Biphasic Human Insulin 30 Both in Combination With Metformin in Insulin-naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled on Oral Antidiabetic Drugs (OADs) Therapy

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate the blood sugar lowering effect and the safety profile of biphasic insulin aspart 30 compared to biphasic human insulin 30, both in combination with metformin in Chinese insulin-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes when failing on oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) therapy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

145

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 diabetes diagnosed for at least 6 months
  • Insulin-naive (less than or equal to 1 week of daily use of insulin therapy)
  • Treatment with metformin as monotherapy or in combination therapy with other OAD(s) for at least 3 months prior to this trial
  • Currently on metformin greater than or equal to 1000 mg/day for at least 2 weeks
  • Currently at least one of other OAD(s) reaching at least one-half of the recommended maximum dose for at least 2 weeks
  • Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) between 7.5-11.0%
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18.5 - 35.0 kg/m^2
  • Be able and willing to perform continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS ) and self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected allergy to trial product(s) or related products
  • Any contraindication of metformin
  • Receipt of investigational drug within the last 3 months prior to this trial
  • Any history of chronic insulin therapy (more than 1 week of daily use)
  • Systemically treated with thiazolidinediones (TZDs) for more than one month within 6 months prior to this trial
  • Pregnancy, nursing mother, or unwillingness to use adequate contraception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BIAsp 30
BIAsp 30 (biphasic insulin aspart 30) administered subcutaneously (under the skin) twice daily (before breakfast and dinner) + metformin. Initial total daily dose of 0.3 U or IU/kg body weight followed by individual dose adjustment for BIAsp 30 was performed over the first 4 weeks (titration period) to achieve the pre-meal blood glucose target of 4.4-6.1 mmol/l. The achieved dose was maintained for the last 2 weeks of treatment unless hypoglycaemia occurred.
The initial doses for BIAsp 30 twice-daily regimen will be recommended to start at a total daily dose of 0.3 U/kg body weight and to be equally divided (1/2:1/2) between pre-breakfast and pre-dinner
Metformin dose must remain the same as that used prior to the trial.
Experimental: BHI 30
BHI 30 (biphasic human insulin 30) administered subcutaneously (under the skin) twice daily (30 minutes before breakfast and dinner) + metformin. Initial total daily dose of 0.3 U or IU/kg body weight followed by individual dose adjustment for BHI 30 was performed over the first 4 weeks (titration period) to achieve the pre-meal blood glucose target of 4.4-6.1 mmol/l. The achieved dose was maintained for the last 2 weeks of treatment unless hypoglycaemia occurred.
Metformin dose must remain the same as that used prior to the trial.
The initial doses for BHI 30 twice-daily regimen will be recommended to start at a total daily dose of 0.3 IU/kg body weight and to be divided in the ratio of 2/3:1/3 between pre-breakfast and pre-dinner

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in IAUC (Incremental Area Under the Curve) for Postprandial Glucose (0-4 Hours) Over 3 Main Meals
Time Frame: Week 0, week 6
The blood glucose profiles were monitored by CGMS (Continuous Glucose Monitoring System) for 72 hours at baseline (week 0) and end of treatment (week 6). IAUC was calculated using the trapezoidal method. The arithmetic mean of IAUC (3 meal-specific incremental areas) of day 1 and day 2 was used as the value of IAUC for each CGMS period
Week 0, week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mean IAUC for Postprandial Glucose (0-4 Hours) After Each Meal (Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner) Assessed by CGMS
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 6
The blood glucose profiles were monitored by CGMS for 72 hours at baseline (week 0) and end of treatment (week 6). IAUC (0-4 hours) after each meal at 6 weeks and change in IAUC (0-4 hours) from baseline (week 0) after each meal were to be assessed. The arithmetic mean of day 1 and day 2 for each meal-specific incremental area (breakfast, lunch, dinner) was calculated.
Week 0, Week 6
Mean FBG (Fasting Blood Glucose) Assessed by CGMS
Time Frame: Week 6
The blood glucose profiles were monitored by CGMS for 72 hours at end of treatment (week 6). Mean FBG assessed by CGMS at 6 weeks. FBG was read on the CGMS glucose curves at 06:00 each morning over the 72 hours. The arithmetic mean of day 1 and day 2 was used as the value of mean FBG for each CGMS period.
Week 6
Change in Mean FBG Assessed by CGMS
Time Frame: Week 0, week 6
The blood glucose profiles were monitored by CGMS for 72 hours at baseline (week 0) and at end of treatment (week 6). Change in mean FBG from baseline (week 0) was assessed. FBG was read on the CGMS glucose curves at 06:00 each morning over the 72 hours. The arithmetic mean of day 1 and day 2 was used as the value of mean FBG for each CGMS period.
Week 0, week 6
Change in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose)
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 6
FPG was analysed by local laboratories at baseline (week 0) and end of treatment (week 6). Change in FPG at end of treatment (week 6) from baseline (week 0) was to be assessed.
Week 0, Week 6
Change in 8-point SMBG (Self-monitored Blood Glucose) Profiles
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 6
Subjects were asked to perform 8-point SMBG profiles using the provided blood glucose meter on one day within 72 hours CGMS monitoring period at week 0 and week 6. Change in blood glucose level at end of treatment (week 6) from baseline (week 0) at each time point was to be assessed respectively. Blood glucose levels were measured at the following 8 time points: Before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), 120 minutes after the start of each meal, at bedtime and at 3 am in the morning.
Week 0, Week 6
Change in Prandial Blood Glucose Increment
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 6
Subjects were asked to perform 8-point SMBG profiles using the provided blood glucose meter on one day within 72 hours CGMS monitoring period at week 0 and week 6 respectively. Prandial increment was the difference between the blood glucose (BG) value measured 120 minutes after meal and the BG value measured before meal.
Week 0, Week 6
Change in MAGE (Mean Amplitude of Glycaemic Excursions) Assessed by CGMS
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 6
MAGE is a parameter to monitor the intraday blood glucose excursions. It was calculated using CGMS data and as the arithmetic mean of glycaemic excursion with the criterion that both segments (ascending and descending parts) of the glycaemic excursion exceed of the value of one standard deviation of respective 24-hour blood glucose value. The direction of calculation (peak-to-nadir or nadir-to-peak) was established by the direction of the first excursion. The arithmetic mean of the glycaemic excursion of day 1 and day 2 was the value of MAGE for each CGMS
Week 0, Week 6
Change in GA (Glycated Albumin)
Time Frame: Week -2, week 6
Glycated Albumin is used as a general glycaemic control parameter. Analysed by laboratory. GA was measured at baseline (week 0) and end of treatment (week 6). Change in GA at end of treatment (week 6) from baseline (week 0) was assessed.
Week -2, week 6
Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time Frame: Week -2, week 6
Week -2, week 6
Duration of Hypoglycaemic Events Based on CGMS
Time Frame: 72-hour monitoring period at Week 0 and Week 6
The CGMS device recorded blood glucose levels every 10 seconds then stored a smoothed average over 5 minutes. The range of blood glucose detection was 2.2-22 mmol/l. Hypoglycaemia was defined as blood glucose readings below 3.5 mmol/l or below 2.5 mmol/l, respectively. The duration of the hypoglycaemic episodes was quantified by accumulating the total time the CGMS profiles stays below the defined threshold (i.e. below 3.5 mmol/l or below 2.5 mmol/l, respectively).
72-hour monitoring period at Week 0 and Week 6
Hypoglycaemia Based on Self-reported Episodes
Time Frame: Weeks 0-6
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occurring in the trial after baseline (week 0) until the end of treatment (week 6). Hypoglycaemic episodes are classified as major, minor or symptoms only: Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself; minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and self monitored blood glucose (SMBG) was below 2.8 mmol/L; symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no blood glucose measurement or SMBG higher than or equal to 2.8 mmol/L.
Weeks 0-6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

December 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on biphasic insulin aspart 30

3
Subscribe