- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00814840
Efficiency Study of Triple-Site Cardiac Resynchronization in Patients With Heart Failure (TRUST CRT)
April 12, 2016 updated by: Radoslaw Lenarczyk, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases
Triple-Site Versus Standard Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (TRUST CRT) Randomized Trial
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficiency of permanent biventricular pacing using three ventricular leads in terms of reduction in adverse cardiac events rates, improvement in cardiac capacity and patients' functional status in subjects with congestive heart failure and a physiologic (sinus) rhythm.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
100
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Zabrze, Poland, 41-800
- First Department of Cardiology, Silesian Medical University, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 or more,
- Congestive heart failure (HF) in NYHA class III-IV within last 90 days despite optimal medical treatment,
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) <=35% measured with echocardiography,
- Sinus rhythm >90% of the time in 24-h Holter monitoring 1-3 days prior to randomization,
- Inter- or intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony ≥40ms measured with pulse Doppler and tissue Doppler echocardiography,
- Optimal pharmacotherapy during the last 90 days,
- Signed informed, written consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding,
- Unstable HF requiring hospitalization with intravenous inotropic drugs within last 90 days,
- Myocardial infarction, percutaneous/surgical revascularization or any cardiosurgical procedure within 90 days prior to randomization,
- Stroke within last 90 days,
- History of chronic or persistent atrial fibrillation, flutter, tachycardia,
- Acute myocarditis,
- Implanted previously pacemaker, ICD or CRT-device,
- Participation in a concurrent trial that could confuse the results of this study,
- Mechanical right heart valve,
- Prior heart transplant,
- Valvular disease that is indication for valve surgery,
- Coronary heart disease if percutaneous or surgical revascularization is indicated and possible,
- Any state, apart from HF, that limits the estimated survival time to <1 year,
- Unwillingness or inability to understand the nature of the study, to participate or to give written informed consent.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Triple-site group
Triple-site resynchronization group
|
Cardiac resynchronization pacemaker (InSync Sentry or Concerto, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN,USA) with three intraventricular leads: one in the right ventricle and two in the left ventricle (via the coronary sinus).
Two left ventricular leads connected with Y-connector (Lead Adaptor 2827, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard resynchronization group
Standard (double-site) resynchronization group
|
Cardiac resynchronization with two intraventricular leads: one in the right ventricle and one in the left ventricle (via the coronary sinus)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Combined end-point of alive status, freedom from hospitalization for HF or heart transplantation, relative ≥10% increase in LV ejection fraction, ≥10% in VO2max and ≥10% in 6MWD.
Time Frame: six months
|
six months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
The occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (hospitalization for exacerbated HF requiring modification of pharmacotherapy, heart transplant or death).
Time Frame: five years
|
five years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Radosław Lenarczyk, M.D., First Department of Cardiology, Silesian Medical University, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases
- Study Chair: Zbigniew Kalarus, M.D., First Department of Cardiology, Silesian Medical University, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Kukulski T, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Sokal A, Szulik M, Zielinska T, Kowalczyk J, Pluta S, Sredniawa B, Musialik-Lydka A, Kalarus Z. Mid-term outcomes of triple-site vs. conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy: a preliminary study. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Mar 20;133(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.12.009. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
- Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Kukulski T, Szulik M, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Zielinska T, Kowalczyk J, Pluta S, Duszanska A, Sredniawa B, Musialik-Lydka A, Kalarus Z. Triple-site biventricular pacing in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a feasibility study. Europace. 2007 Sep;9(9):762-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum140. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
- Leclercq C, Gadler F, Kranig W, Ellery S, Gras D, Lazarus A, Clementy J, Boulogne E, Daubert JC; TRIP-HF (Triple Resynchronization In Paced Heart Failure Patients) Study Group. A randomized comparison of triple-site versus dual-site ventricular stimulation in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Apr 15;51(15):1455-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.074.
- Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Sredniawa B, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Pluta S, Sokal A, Kukulski T, Stabryla-Deska J, Wozniak A, Kowalczyk J, Zielinska T, Mazurek M, Streb W, Zembala M, Kalarus Z. Triple-site versus standard cardiac resynchronization therapy study (TRUST CRT): clinical rationale, design, and implementation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):658-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01394.x.
- Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Sredniawa B, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Mazurek M, Jedrzejczyk-Patej E, Wozniak A, Pluta S, Glowacki J, Kalarus Z. Implantation feasibility, procedure-related adverse events and lead performance during 1-year follow-up in patients undergoing triple-site cardiac resynchronization therapy: a substudy of TRUST CRT randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;23(11):1228-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02375.x. Epub 2012 May 31.
- Lenarczyk R, Jedrzejczyk-Patej E, Mazurek M, Szulik M, Kowalski O, Pruszkowska P, Sokal A, Sredniawa B, Boidol J, Kowalczyk J, Podolecki T, Mencel G, Kalarus Z. Quality of life in cardiac resynchronization recipients: association with response and impact on outcome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;38(1):8-17. doi: 10.1111/pace.12523. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
- Kowalczyk J, Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Podolecki T, Francuz P, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Szulik M, Mazurek M, Jedrzejczyk-Patej E, Sredniawa B, Kalarus Z; Triple-Site Versus Standard Cardiac Resynchronization Trial (TRUST CRT) Investigators. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy-incidence and prognostic importance. Sub-analysis of data from randomized TRUST CRT trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun;40(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9887-x. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
- Boidol J, Sredniawa B, Kowalski O, Szulik M, Mazurek M, Sokal A, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Kukulski T, Kalarus Z, Lenarczyk R; Triple-Site Versus Standard Cardiac Resynchronisation Trial (TRUST CRT) Investigators. Many response criteria are poor predictors of outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: validation using data from the randomized trial. Europace. 2013 Jun;15(6):835-44. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus390. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2010
Study Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2008
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 23, 2008
First Posted (Estimate)
December 25, 2008
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
April 13, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 12, 2016
Last Verified
April 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SilesianCHD-KNW-6501-3/08
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Disease
-
Boston Children's HospitalRecruitingValve Disease, Heart | Valve Heart Disease | Valve Disease, AorticUnited States
-
Centre Chirurgical Marie LannelongueActive, not recruitingValvular Heart Disease | Valve Disease, Heart
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedMitral Valvular Heart Disease
-
National Defense Medical Center, TaiwanRecruiting
-
Shanghai Zhongshan HospitalCompletedElectrocardiogram, Valvular Heart DiseaseChina, United Kingdom
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedAortic Valve Disease | Valvular Heart DiseaseChina
-
Mansoura UniversitySuspendedValve Heart Disease | Elective Cesarean DeliveryEgypt
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaRecruitingAdult Congenital Heart Disease | Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) | Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease | Heart Transplant PatientsItaly
-
Tulane UniversityRecruitingCardiomyopathies | Valvular Heart Disease | Pericardial DiseaseUnited States
Clinical Trials on Triple-site cardiac resynchronization
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureCompleted
-
Sheba Medical CenterUnknown
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenActive, not recruitingHeart Failure | Cardiomyopathy, Dilated | Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony | Cardiac Remodeling, VentricularBelgium, Germany, Poland, France, Switzerland, Brazil, Spain, Hungary, Latvia, Portugal, Romania
-
Larisa TereshchenkoCompletedHeart Failure | Cardiomyopathy | Left Bundle Branch BlockUnited States
-
Biotronik SE & Co. KGActive, not recruitingHeart FailureFrance, Spain, Belgium, Israel, United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, Latvia, Germany, Singapore, Italy, Switzerland, Portugal, Czechia, Taiwan, South Africa, Austria, Hungary, Slovakia, Poland
-
Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (Inserm U970)University Hospital, Montpellier; Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere; European... and other collaboratorsCompletedCongenital Heart Disease
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterMedtronicUnknownCardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Non-LBBB, QRS AreaNetherlands
-
University of LouisvilleWithdrawn
-
Medtronic Latin AmericaUnknown