Safety and Efficacy Trial to Treat Diastolic Heart Failure Using Ambrisentan

Safety and Efficacy Trial Using Ambrisentan for Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Congestive Heart Failure With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

This is a randomized study of ambrisentan that will last 16 weeks. The study will include patients with diastolic heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to ambrisentan or placebo. The ambrisentan or matching placebo will be started at 2.5 mg by mouth daily and increased to 5mg and then 10mg daily, if tolerated. Patients will be seen at least monthly for 16 weeks. Adverse reactions will be reviewed and the required monthly laboratory tests (liver function testing and pregnancy testing, if applicable), will be performed. Patients will also complete an exercise test (six minute walk distance) and a quality of life survey at the baseline, week 4 and week 16 visit. An echocardiogram and a right heart catheterization and left ventricular end diastolic pressure measurement will be performed at the 16 week visit. The primary end-point is safety, and secondary end-points include the catheterization results, echocardiogram results, the walk distance and the quality of life survey. The expected completion of the study is 18 months from initiation. Ambrisentan is an FDA approved drug for PAH, but not for CHF.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hypothesis: patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to diastolic congestive heart failure (CHF) treated with ambrisentan for 16 weeks will have improved hemodynamics, increased exercise capacity and improved functional class with an acceptable safety profile, compared with placebo treated patients.

Objectives: to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ambrisentan treatment in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to diastolic CHF. Efficacy will be assessed by improvement in hemodynamics (PVR(Pulmonary Vascular Resistance): primary efficacy endpoint), six minute walk distance (6MWD), World Health Organization (WHO) functional class and quality of life after 16 weeks of treatment with ambrisentan. Safety of ambrisentan will be compared to placebo.

Concomitant Medication: Treatment with standard medications for CHF including diuretics and optimal blood pressure control with antihypertensive medications will be allowed throughout the study period. Diuretics adjustment will also be allowed and encouraged based on the planned diuretic management protocol. Approved medications for CHF in general are allowed as well, though it should be noted that there are no medications shown to have benefit in diastolic CHF. Patients may not be on an endothelin antagonist or sildenafil.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390-8550
        • UT Southwestern Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Catheterization

    1. Elevated pulmonary arterial pressure (PA mean >25mmHg)
    2. Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (>240 dynes.cm.sec-5) or transpulmonary gradient (>12 mmHg)
    3. Elevated LVEDP (>15mmHg, but ≤23 mmHg)
  2. Evidence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: LA>4.0, LVH or diastolic dysfunction by mitral filling pattern
  3. Echocardiogram: Normal or mildly reduced LV ejection fraction (greater than or equal to 40%)
  4. Symptomatic chronic HF (WHO functional class II-IV)
  5. Baseline walk distance 100 to 400 meters
  6. Age 18 - 80 (increased from 70)

Maximal treatment of diastolic dysfunction as noted by the treating physicians with no change in medical therapy for one month prior to entry

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Use of endothelin receptor antagonist, prostacyclin or PDE-5 inhibitor within 4 weeks of enrollment
  2. Exercise capacity limited by other illness (other lung disease, arthritis, mobility limitations)
  3. Uncontrolled systemic hypertension
  4. Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation
  5. Severe valvular disease
  6. Pregnant females- females of child bearing potential will need to use contraceptive agent barrier given the teratogenicity associated with ERA's
  7. Uncontrolled OSA

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: 2
Sugar pill
Other Names:
  • The placebo will look identical to the Ambrisentan tablets
Active Comparator: 1
Subjects will be initiated at 2.5 mg per day and increased to 5mg daily in 2 weeks and then 10mg daily if clinically tolerated (edema is controlled and symptoms are stable).
Other Names:
  • Letairis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (Wood Units)
Time Frame: Baseline and Four months
The primary efficacy outcome will be Pulmonary Vascular Resistance.PVR will be calculated as [(PA mean - wedge) / Cardiac Output]
Baseline and Four months
Safety Assessment-Number of Subjects Who Are Free and Those Who Developed Clinically Significant Adverse Events (CSAEs)
Time Frame: 4 months
Freedom from clinically significant adverse events will be measure by determining the number free from CSAEs and those who developed CSAEs
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 6 Minute Walk Distance
Time Frame: Baseline and Four months
subjects complete the 6 minute walk test to determine how far (in meters) they are able to walk in 6 minutes.
Baseline and Four months
Change in Functional Class
Time Frame: basline and 4 months
Change in functional class from baseline to month 4. This is graded from WHO FC I to FC IV. Assessment will be completed by an investigator on the study at every visit.
basline and 4 months
Change in Short Form-36 Physical Functioning
Time Frame: baseline 4 months
Change between baseline and follow-up in the physical functioning items of the SF-36 questionnaire. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. The eight sections are: vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, emotional role functioning, social role functioning, and mental health
baseline 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kelly M Chin, MD, UT Southwestern Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Fernando Torres, MD, UT Southwestern Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

February 10, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Ambrisentan

Subscribe